Protection and mechanism of naringin on oxidative damage of L02 liver cells
Hui Zhao,Wei Meng,Shuhong Yi,Guihua Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2014.02.011
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the protective effect and mechanism of naringin on oxidative damage of L02 liver cells. Methods Blank group (L02 liver cells only), naringin group (L02 liver cells with naringin 25 μmol/L), H2O2 damage group (damage group, L02 liver cells with H2O2 200 μmol/L)and protection group (L02 liver cells with H2O2 200μmol/L and naringin 25μmol/L) were assigned. Cell viability was evaluated by detecting cell absorbance value (A488). Cell apoptosis rate was detected by flow cytometry. Mitochondrial membrane potential ( Ψm) was detected by using 5, 5', 6, 6'-tetrachloro-1, 1', 3, 3'-tetrethyl benzimidalyl carbocyanine iodide (JC-1). Malondialdehyde (MDA) was evaluated by detecting cell absorbance value (A532). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) was evaluated by detecting fluorescence intensity by flow cytometry. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) specific activity was detected by using improved xanthine oxidase detection method. Data of these groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance and LSD-t test. Results The average cell viability (A488), cell apoptosis rate, Ψm were 0.702±0.010, (25.0±0.9)%, 0.95±0.03 respectively in damage group, 0.839±0.032, (14.8±1.7)%, 1.28±0.07 respectively in protection group, and 0.992±0.013, (6.2±0.5)%,1.71±0.08 respectively in blank group. There were signiifcant differences in cell viability, cell apoptosis rate, Ψm between damage group and blank group (LSD-t=-27.44, 34.98,-19.88;P<0.05). There were signiifcant differences in cell viability, cell apoptosis rate, Ψm between damage group and protection group (LSD-t=12.94,-18.91, 8.66;P<0.05). The MDA (A532) , ROS (lfuorescence intensity) and SOD specific activity were 0.610±0.051, 1 772±69, (67±2)U/g respectively in damage group, 0.346±0.008, 588±24, (111±6)U/g respectively in protective group, 0.121±0.003, 337±17, (159±5)U/g respectively in naringin group, and 0.123±0.007, 375±16, (142±5)U/g respectively in blank group. There were signiifcant differences in ROS and SOD speciifc activity between naringin group and blank group (LSD-t=-2.24, 5.55;P<0.05). There were signiifcant differences in MDA, ROS and SOD speciifc activity between damage group and blank group (LSD-t=31.66, 77.85,-24.12;P<0.05). There were significant differences in MDA, ROS and SOD specific activity between protective group and damage group (LSD-t=-17.12,-65.97, 14.03;P<0.05). Conclusion Naringin can protect L02 liver cell against oxidative damage by improving its antioxidant capacity.