Prognostic Value of Reading-to-reading Blood Pressure Variability over 24 Hours in 8938 Subjects from 11 Populations.

Tine W. Hansen,Lutgarde Thijs,Yan Li,Jose Boggia,Masahiro Kikuya,Kristina Bjorklund-Bodegard,Tom Richart,Takayoshi Ohkubo,Jorgen Jeppesen,Christian Torp-Pedersen,Eamon Dolan,Tatiana Kuznetsova,Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek,Valerie Tikhonoff,Sofia Malyutina,Edoardo Casiglia,Yuri Nikitin,Lars Lind,Edgardo Sandoya,Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz,Yutaka Imai,Jiguang Wang,Hans Ibsen,Eoin O'Brien,Jan A. Staessen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.140798
IF: 9.8968
2010-01-01
Hypertension
Abstract:In previous studies, of which several were underpowered, the relation between cardiovascular outcome and blood pressure (BP) variability was inconsistent. We followed health outcomes in 8938 subjects (mean age: 53.0 years; 46.8% women) randomly recruited from 11 populations. At baseline, we assessed BP variability from the SD and average real variability in 24-hour ambulatory BP recordings. We computed standardized hazard ratios (HRs) while stratifying by cohort and adjusting for 24-hour BP and other risk factors. Over 11.3 years (median), 1242 deaths (487 cardiovascular) occurred, and 1049, 577, 421, and 457 participants experienced a fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular, cardiac, or coronary event or a stroke. Higher diastolic average real variability in 24-hour ambulatory BP recordings predicted ( P ≤0.03) total (HR: 1.14) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.21) mortality and all types of fatal combined with nonfatal end points (HR: ≥1.07) with the exception of cardiac and coronary events (HR: ≤1.02; P ≥0.58). Higher systolic average real variability in 24-hour ambulatory BP recordings predicted ( P <0.05) total (HR: 1.11) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.16) mortality and all fatal combined with nonfatal end points (HR: ≥1.07), with the exception of cardiac and coronary events (HR: ≤1.03; P ≥0.54). SD predicted only total and cardiovascular mortality. While accounting for the 24-hour BP level, average real variability in 24-hour ambulatory BP recordings added <1% to the prediction of a cardiovascular event. Sensitivity analyses considering ethnicity, sex, age, previous cardiovascular disease, antihypertensive treatment, number of BP readings per recording, or the night:day BP ratio were confirmatory. In conclusion, in a large population cohort, which provided sufficient statistical power, BP variability assessed from 24-hour ambulatory recordings did not contribute much to risk stratification over and beyond 24-hour BP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?