Separating sampling effect from complementary effect in the annual plant communities

JIANG Xiao-Lei,ZHANG Wei-Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.06.034
2006-01-01
Acta Ecologica Sinica
Abstract:Experimental studies have shown that species diversity has a positive effect on the productivity of plant communities.However,the causality of such a relationship has been hotly debated.The debate has focused on the potential mechanisms that may cause productivity increases with increasing species diversity.Recent theoretical work has revealed that responses of productivity to changes in species diversity can be generated by a combination of different effects.The two mechanisms mentioned most frequently are the sampling effect and the complementary effect.The sampling effect predicts that where species assemblages are randomly constructed from a fixed species pool,speciesrich communities have a higher probability of including species that have the greatest individual effects on productivity.The complementary effect supposes that different species use available resources in different ways so that more diverse communities to more fully exploit available resources compared to less diverse communities.Although both of these effects are potentially relevant,they have different implications and therefore may apply to different circumstances.As such,it is important to separate one from the other and to estimate their individual contributions to biodiversity studies.For this purpose,we carried out a diversity experiment using artificially constructed communities of annual plant species under field conditions to investigate both how plant specie diversity affects ecosystem productivity,and to test the contributions of the sampling effect and complementary effect to community productivity.We used the 'additive partitioning' method introduced by Loreau and Hector to separate sampling effects from complementary effects.We found that productivity varied greatly in response to increasing species diversity(p<0.01) and species composition(p<0.01).When species diversity was restricted,species diversity had a positive effect on community productivity,but for a given progression of increasing species richness,the response of productivity was shown to be unimodal,rather than monotonically increasing(y=-24.592 x~2+262.19 x-17.801;R~2=0.4211).The calculations indicated that although all of the mixtures showed a positive net effect of diversity(ΔY>0),it was not linearly correlated to species diversity (r=0.114,p=0.351),but positively correlated to community productivity(r=0.345,p<0.001).The two components of the net effect,the sampling effect and the complementary effect,responded differently to increasing species diversity.The complementary effect responded to species diversity quadratically(y=-12.502 x~2+119.07x-108.52,R~2=0.38),while the sampling effect showed a positive correlation to species diversity(r=0.516,p<0.001).Both the sampling effect and complementary effect are positively correlated to community productivity(r=0.342,p<0.05 and r=0.672,p<0.001,respectively).In addition to species diversity,species composition(or species trait) also has a significant influence on community productivity(p<0.001),net effect of diversity(p<0.05),the sampling effect(p<0.01) and the complementary effect(p<0.05).Thus,we can draw a conclusion that in our short-term experiment of annual plant communities,the sampling effect and the complementary effect can simultaneously operate on how species diversity influences ecosystem productivity.The sampling effect in comparison to the complementary effect had a more significant correlation with community productivity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?