Zero-sized Effect of Nano-particles and Inverse Homogeneous Nucleation
Xiang Yang Liu,Ning Du
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m310487200
IF: 5.485
2004-01-01
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Abstract:It was found that freezing of water in terms of homogeneous nucleation of ice never occurs even in ultra-clean micro-sized water droplets under normal conditions. More surprisingly, at sufficiently low supercoolings, foreign nano-particles exert no effect on the nucleation barrier of ice; it is as if they physically "vanished." This effect, called hereafter the "zero-sized" effect of foreign particles (or nucleators), leads to the entry of a so-called inverse homogeneous-like nucleation domain, in which nucleation is effectively suppressed. The freezing temperature of water corresponds to the transition temperature from the inverse homogeneous-like nucleation regime to foreign particle-mediated heterogeneous nucleation. The freezing temperature of water is mainly determined by (i) the surface roughness of nucleators at large supercoolings, (ii) the interaction and structural match between nucleating ice and the substrate, and (iii) the size of the effective surface of nucleators at low supercoolings. Our experiments showed that the temperature of -40 °C, commonly regarded as the temperature of homogeneous nucleation-mediated freezing, is actually the transition temperature from the inverse homogeneous-like nucleation regime to foreign particle-mediated heterogeneous nucleation in ultra-clean water. Taking advantage of inverse homogeneous-like nucleation, the interfacial tensions between water and ice in very pure water and antifreeze aqueous solutions were measured at a very high precision for the first time. The principles of freezing promotion and antifreeze and the selection for the biological ice nucleation and antifreeze proteins are obtained. The results provide completely new insights into freezing and antifreeze phenomena and bear generic implications for all crystallization systems. It was found that freezing of water in terms of homogeneous nucleation of ice never occurs even in ultra-clean micro-sized water droplets under normal conditions. More surprisingly, at sufficiently low supercoolings, foreign nano-particles exert no effect on the nucleation barrier of ice; it is as if they physically "vanished." This effect, called hereafter the "zero-sized" effect of foreign particles (or nucleators), leads to the entry of a so-called inverse homogeneous-like nucleation domain, in which nucleation is effectively suppressed. The freezing temperature of water corresponds to the transition temperature from the inverse homogeneous-like nucleation regime to foreign particle-mediated heterogeneous nucleation. The freezing temperature of water is mainly determined by (i) the surface roughness of nucleators at large supercoolings, (ii) the interaction and structural match between nucleating ice and the substrate, and (iii) the size of the effective surface of nucleators at low supercoolings. Our experiments showed that the temperature of -40 °C, commonly regarded as the temperature of homogeneous nucleation-mediated freezing, is actually the transition temperature from the inverse homogeneous-like nucleation regime to foreign particle-mediated heterogeneous nucleation in ultra-clean water. Taking advantage of inverse homogeneous-like nucleation, the interfacial tensions between water and ice in very pure water and antifreeze aqueous solutions were measured at a very high precision for the first time. The principles of freezing promotion and antifreeze and the selection for the biological ice nucleation and antifreeze proteins are obtained. The results provide completely new insights into freezing and antifreeze phenomena and bear generic implications for all crystallization systems. The question of how freezing occurs in micro-sized ultra-clean water droplets is of crucial relevance in agriculture and food and life sciences in phenomena like frost bite (cell damage due to ice freezing) (1Mutaftschiev B. Hurle D.T.J Handbook of Crystal Growth. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands1993Google Scholar, 2Davies P.L. Sykes B.D. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997; 7: 828-834Crossref PubMed Scopus (188) Google Scholar, 3Davies P.L. Hew C.L. FASEB J. 1990; 4: 2460-2468Crossref PubMed Scopus (375) Google Scholar, 4Knight C.A. Nature. 2000; 406: 249-251Crossref PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar, 5Jia Z.C. Davies P.L. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002; 27: 101-106Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (326) Google Scholar). In most cases, freezing is mediated by minute foreign particles, including bacterial epiphytes. The understanding of ice nucleation under the influence of minute foreign particles is particularly important for the identification of novel technologies in controlling freezing and antifreeze in general. The eminent antifreeze effect results from antifreeze proteins found in the blood and tissues of organisms that live in freezing environments (2Davies P.L. Sykes B.D. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997; 7: 828-834Crossref PubMed Scopus (188) Google Scholar). In these organisms, the effect of freezing proteins is retarded, or the damage incurred upon freezing and thawing is reduced (2Davies P.L. Sykes B.D. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997; 7: 828-834Crossref PubMed Scopus (188) Google Scholar, 3Davies P.L. Hew C.L. FASEB J. 1990; 4: 2460-2468Crossref PubMed Scopus (375) Google Scholar, 4Knight C.A. Nature. 2000; 406: 249-251Crossref PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar). Applications of the antifreeze effect of these antifreeze proteins (AFPs), 1The abbreviations used are: AFPantifreeze proteinDIdeionizedINPice nucleation proteins. the capacity to inhibit ice crystallization, have been sought for maintaining texture in frozen foods, improving storage of blood, tissues and organs, cryosurgery, and protecting crops from freezing (4Knight C.A. Nature. 2000; 406: 249-251Crossref PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar). Freezing is a process of ice crystallization from supercooled water. In this process, water should undergo the stage of ice nucleation, followed by the growth of ice (1Mutaftschiev B. Hurle D.T.J Handbook of Crystal Growth. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands1993Google Scholar). Actually, whether or not freezing takes place is determined to a large extent by ice nucleation. In other words, there would be no ice growth if ice nucleation did not occur. antifreeze protein deionized ice nucleation proteins. Despite their importance, the microphysical mechanisms responsible for the formation of ice nuclei under the influence of minute foreign particles are not very well understood. Because of the fact that ice nucleation is the initial and one of the most important steps in the freezing process, the question of whether ice crystallization is governed by homogeneous or heterogeneous nucleation bears significant implications for antifreeze, ice nucleation promotion, and freezing-related phenomena and activities. Spontaneous nucleation of ice from water, in particular below -40 °C, has in most cases been regarded as "homogeneous nucleation" (2Davies P.L. Sykes B.D. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997; 7: 828-834Crossref PubMed Scopus (188) Google Scholar, 3Davies P.L. Hew C.L. FASEB J. 1990; 4: 2460-2468Crossref PubMed Scopus (375) Google Scholar, 4Knight C.A. Nature. 2000; 406: 249-251Crossref PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar, 5Jia Z.C. Davies P.L. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002; 27: 101-106Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (326) Google Scholar, 6Koop T. Ng H.P. Molina L.T. Molina M.J. J. Phys. Chem. 1998; A102: 8924-8931Crossref Scopus (156) Google Scholar, 7Hare D.E. Sorensen C.M. J. Chem. Phys. 1987; 87: 4840-4845Crossref Scopus (180) Google Scholar). This means that water is considered to be clean and "dust free." It is supposed that, even though there are some minute foreign particles that occur in water, they don't exert any direct impact on nucleation. The key questions to be addressed are whether the effect of nano-particles can be neglected completely even at T < -40 °C, and if not, how they affect the nucleation and freezing of water. On the other hand, if heterogeneous nucleation inevitably takes place, it is believed (8Mullin J.W. Crystallization. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford1997: 182-194Google Scholar, 9Söhnel O. Garside J. Precipitation, Basic Principles and Industrial Application. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford1992: 41-76Google Scholar, 10Garside J. Nancollas G.H. Biological Mineralization and Demineralization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin2000: 23-35Google Scholar) to be dominant at low supercoolings (or low supersaturations), whereas homogeneous nucleation is believed to occur at very high supercoolings (or very high supersaturations). In this paper, we examine the effect of a trace amount of foreign nano-particles on ice nucleation in ultra-pure micro-sized water droplets and its implications for freezing and antifreeze in general. We also examine how antifreeze proteins change the surface characteristics of foreign bodies. Based on this, we should be able to obtain a new and comprehensive understanding of freezing promotion and antifreeze mechanisms. The experiments on ice nucleation were carried out by employing the so-called double oil-layer micro-sized microscopic crystallization technique (11Du N. Liu W.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002; 81: 445-447Crossref Scopus (21) Google Scholar). This technology allows the influence of the container on ice nucleation to be minimized, and the examination of ice nucleation kinetics under well controlled conditions. A micro-sized deionized (DI) water (18.2 mΩ) droplet (∼0.1 μl) was suspended between two layers of immiscible oil in a circular quartz cell (compare with the schematic illustration in Fig. 2) (11Du N. Liu W.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002; 81: 445-447Crossref Scopus (21) Google Scholar). To minimize the effect of foreign particles, the water and oils were filtered twice to remove foreign particles before they were injected into the cell. In our experiments, antifreeze protein III (AFPIII) was employed to control freezing. AFPIII is a protein with a compact, globular structure in which the overall fold comprises numerous short β-strands and one turn of α-helix (12Jia Z. Deluca C.I. Chao H. Davies P.L. Nature. 1996; 384: 285-288Crossref PubMed Scopus (222) Google Scholar). In our experiments, the lower layer of oil (oil 1, Silicon Oil AR 1000 from Fluka), which has a greater density than water, was injected into the quartz cell up to one-half of its volume. Next, a drop of pure water or a drop of an AFPIII solution was carefully injected onto the surface of the oil by using a micro syringe. Then, an oil (oil 2, 200/500 cS fluid from Dow Corning) with a density lower than that of water was injected to fill the cell, covering the water droplet and the oil layer beneath. A glass coverslip was then placed on the top of the cell to prevent evaporation. Because of the density differences, the water droplet was suspended between the two layers of immiscible oils. The ice crystallization was controlled by a Linkam THMS 600 heating and freezing stage, which is capable of controlling the temperature to 0.1 °C within a range from -192 to +600 °C where the cell was mounted. Nucleation was observed with a polarized transmitted microscope (Olympus, BX60-F) to which a three-charge-coupled device color video camera (Panasonic, KY-F55BE) with an S-VHS video recorder (Panasonic AG-MD830) was attached (11Du N. Liu W.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002; 81: 445-447Crossref Scopus (21) Google Scholar). Any ice crystal forming in the drop could immediately be detected by the polarized microscope. Each data set was repeated 3 or 4 times to check the reproducibility of the experiment. The Role of Minute Foreign Particles in Freezing—For the ultra-pure DI water, the freezing temperature (for a constant droplet volume) decreased progressively from 239.3 K to 235.2 K to 234.1 K as the pore size of the filters was reduced from 200 nm to 100 nm to 20 nm. This implies that, under normal conditions, it is almost impossible to completely remove foreign particles by filtration. The process of "homogeneous ice crystallization," commonly referred to by authors (13Koop T. Luo B. Tsias A. Peter T. Nature. 2000; 406: 611-614Crossref PubMed Scopus (944) Google Scholar, 14Rasmussen D.H. J. Cryst. Growth. 1982; 56: 56-66Crossref Scopus (41) Google Scholar, 15Kanno H. Angell C.A. J. Phys. Chem. 1977; 81: 2639-2643Crossref Scopus (91) Google Scholar), is actually a foreign particle-mediated heterogeneous ice nucleation process promoted by a trace amount of foreign nano-particles. "Zero-sized" Effect of Foreign Particles—The nucleation process can be regarded as a kinetic process for ice nuclei to overcome the so-called nucleation barrier ΔG* under a given supercooling ΔT (ΔT = Tm - T, where T and Tm are the actual and the melting temperatures, respectively) (16Liu X.Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2000; 111: 1628-1635Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 17Liu X.Y. Lim S.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 888-995Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 18Liu X.Y. Sato K. Nakajima K. Furukawa Y. Advances in Crystal Growth Research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands2001: 42-61Google Scholar, 19Liu X.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001; 79: 39-41Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar). To explore the ice nucleation kinetics, we examined the correlation between the nucleation induction time τ, the time required for the first nucleus to appear in the drop of water with a given volume V, and the supercooling ΔT (ΔT = Tm - Tf, where Tm is melting temperature and Tf is freezing temperature) (16Liu X.Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2000; 111: 1628-1635Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 17Liu X.Y. Lim S.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 888-995Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 18Liu X.Y. Sato K. Nakajima K. Furukawa Y. Advances in Crystal Growth Research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands2001: 42-61Google Scholar, 19Liu X.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001; 79: 39-41Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar). According to the generic nucleation model (16Liu X.Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2000; 111: 1628-1635Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 17Liu X.Y. Lim S.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 888-995Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 18Liu X.Y. Sato K. Nakajima K. Furukawa Y. Advances in Crystal Growth Research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands2001: 42-61Google Scholar), the kinetics of nucleation (Fig. 1) can be taken into account by examining the correlation between the induction time of ice nucleation and supercooling as follows (16Liu X.Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2000; 111: 1628-1635Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 17Liu X.Y. Lim S.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 888-995Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 18Liu X.Y. Sato K. Nakajima K. Furukawa Y. Advances in Crystal Growth Research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands2001: 42-61Google Scholar, 19Liu X.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001; 79: 39-41Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar)ln(τV)=κf(m,R')/T(ΔT)2-ln{f''(m,R')[f(m,R')]1/2BNo}(Eq. 1) ΔG*=κf(m,R')/T(ΔT)2(Eq. 2) rc=2Ωγcf/ΔTΔSm(Eq. 3) κ=16πγcf3Ω2/3kΔSm2(Eq. 4) R'=Rs/rc(Eq. 5) where rc is the radius of a critical nucleus, ΔSm denotes the ice melting entropy per molecule, k is the Boltzmann constant, B is a constant under a given condition, Ω is the volume of a growth unit, Rs and No are the radius and the number density of foreign particles, respectively, and γcf denotes the interfacial free energy between water and ice. In Equation 1, the interfacial correlation function (16Liu X.Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2000; 111: 1628-1635Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 17Liu X.Y. Lim S.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 888-995Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar)f(m,R')=12+12(1-mR'w)2+12R'3[2-3(R'-mw)][+(R'-mw)2]+32mR'2(R'-mw-1)(Eq. 6) w=[1+(R')2-2R'm]1/2(Eq. 7) is important, as it describes the lowering of the nucleation barrier ΔG* because of the occurrence of foreign particles,f(m,R')=ΔG*/ΔGhomo*(Eq. 8) where ΔG*homo (= κ/T(ΔT)2, compare Equations 2 and 8) denotes the homogeneous nucleation barrier. f(m, R′) varies from 0 to 1 (see Fig. 3A), depending on R′ and m (16Liu X.Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2000; 111: 1628-1635Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 17Liu X.Y. Lim S.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 888-995Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 18Liu X.Y. Sato K. Nakajima K. Furukawa Y. Advances in Crystal Growth Research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands2001: 42-61Google Scholar, 19Liu X.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001; 79: 39-41Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar). m (-1 ≤ m ≤ 1) describes the structural match and interaction between the nucleating phase (ice) and foreign particles and can be regarded approximately as cosθ (θ is the contact angle between the nucleating phase and the substrate). F ″(m, R′) is a function similar to f(m, R′) (16Liu X.Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2000; 111: 1628-1635Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 17Liu X.Y. Lim S.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 888-995Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 18Liu X.Y. Sato K. Nakajima K. Furukawa Y. Advances in Crystal Growth Research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands2001: 42-61Google Scholar, 19Liu X.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001; 79: 39-41Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar). For an optimal interaction and structural match between the nucleating phase and the substrate, m → 1 and f(m, R′) → 0 (compare with Fig. 2), meaning that the nucleation barrier is completely eliminated because of the occurrence of foreign particles. When f(m, R′) = 1 (extremely poor structure match/interaction between ice and foreign particles), the nucleation barrier is the highest (ΔG*homo) under the given conditions even when the foreign particles are still present, in which case the foreign particles do not play any role in lowering the nucleation barrier.Fig. 3A, dependence of the interfacial correlation function f(m, R′) on m and R′. B, experimental f(m, R′) ∼ R′ for the four different systems: DI water filtrated by a 20-nm filter (curve A), 0.5 mg/ml AFPIII DI water solution filtrated by a 20-nm filter (curve B), 2.5 mg/ml AFPIII DI water solution filtrated by a 20-nm filter (curve C), and DI water filtrated by a 200-nm filter (curve D). The curves were obtained based on the data given in Fig. 2.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) As shown in Fig. 2, ln(τV) versus 1/T(ΔT)2 is plotted for the following different systems: DI water filtrated by a 20-nm filter (curve A), 0.5 mg/ml AFPIII DI water solution filtrated by a 20-nm filter (curve B), 2.5 mg/ml AFPIII DI water solution filtrated by a 20-nm filter (curve C), and DI water filtrated by a 200-nm filter (curve D). Let us first focus on DI water filtrated by a 20-nm filter (curve A). If freezing were first controlled by heterogeneous nucleation and followed by homogeneous nucleation as ΔT increased, we would have obtained for a nucleating system pair-wise intersecting straight-line segments in the ln(τV) versus 1/T(ΔT)2 plot: one segment with a small slope at low ΔT (or high 1/T(ΔT)2, the other segment with the highest slope at high ΔT (compare Equation 1: the slope is then κf(m, R′) = κ, as f(m,R')|max=1) (8Mullin J.W. Crystallization. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford1997: 182-194Google Scholar, 9Söhnel O. Garside J. Precipitation, Basic Principles and Industrial Application. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford1992: 41-76Google Scholar, 10Garside J. Nancollas G.H. Biological Mineralization and Demineralization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin2000: 23-35Google Scholar, 16Liu X.Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2000; 111: 1628-1635Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 17Liu X.Y. Lim S.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 888-995Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 18Liu X.Y. Sato K. Nakajima K. Furukawa Y. Advances in Crystal Growth Research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands2001: 42-61Google Scholar, 19Liu X.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001; 79: 39-41Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar). In contrast to this expectation, we obtain at low ΔT (high 1/T(ΔT)2) a straight line segment with the largest slope within the measurable range of ΔT, whereas at high ΔT (low 1/T(ΔT)2), we obtain a straight line segment with a much smaller slope, the two straight line segments being joined by a curve (see Fig. 2). This implies that the nucleation barrier rises abruptly to the highest level (ΔG* ≈ ΔG*homo, f(m, R′) = 1) at low supercoolings, as if the foreign particles had "disappeared" (compare Equations 1, 2, and 8). Notice that the other three curves (B-D) share similar characteristics. Hereafter, we will call such an effect on nucleation revealed by foreign particles at low supercoolings the "zero-sized" effect. Inverse Homogeneous-like Nucleation and the Effective Curvature of the Surface Roughness of Foreign Body—To explain the above surprising results, we will analyze the influence of R′ on f(m, R′) and, consequently, on ice nucleation kinetics. R′ is actually the ratio between the radius of the local curvature of the foreign particles (substrate) and that of the critical nuclei rc (compare Equation 5 and Fig. 1). For a given crystallization system, R′ is proportional to ΔT (compare Equations 3 and 5). As shown in Fig. 3A, the f(m, R′) ∼ R′ diagram can be divided into three regimes based on R′ or ΔT. Regime I (linear regime): R′ » 1 (relatively large supercoolings and/or large Rs). In comparison to the critical nuclei, the foreign particles can be treated as a flat substrate. f(m, R′) then attains its lowest value and becomes a constant with respect to R′ (or ΔT), i.e. it assumes the form f(m). According to Equation 1, the plot of ln(τV) versus 1/T(ΔT)2 is a straight line because κ is constant for a given system (compare portion 1 of curve A in Fig. 1). Regime II (nonlinear regime): as ΔT deceases (or 1/T(ΔT)2 increases), rc becomes comparable with Rs (R′ ∼ 1) (compare Equation 3). The ln(τV) ∼ 1/T(ΔT)2 plot becomes a curve (compare the curved segment between portions 1 and 2 of curve A) as f(m, R′) varies with ΔT (or R′). Regime III (zero-sized regime): further lowering ΔT (or raising 1/T(ΔT)2) leads to a much larger rc than the radius Rs of the foreign particles or R′ → 0. In the case f(m, R′)max = 1, one has a straight line with the largest slope (line 2 of curve A in Fig. 1). In this regime, as suggested by the zero-sized effect, the particles behave then as if they had "vanished," although they are still physically present in water. According to Equation 8, the occurrence of the particles does not lower the nucleation barrier with respect to that of genuine homogeneous nucleation. Notice that the nucleation in Regime III is still not genuine homogeneous nucleation. In the case of genuine homogeneous nucleation, one has f″(m, R′) = f(m, R′) = 1 and ln{f″(m, R′)[f(m, R′)]1/2BNo} = constant for the same system, meaning that only one ln(τV) versus 1/T(ΔT)2 plot can be identified in this case for the same system, such as DI water filtrated by a 20-nm filter (Fig. 1, curve A) and DI water filtrated by a 200-nm filter (Fig. 1, curve D). Nevertheless, in comparison to segment 2 in curve A and segment 2′ in curve D, one has two parallel straight lines instead of a single straight line. This means that the nucleation occurring at the "zero-sized" regime (Regime III) is still not genuine homogeneous nucleation, although the height of the nucleation barrier is equivalent to that of homogeneous nucleation. This result is attributed to the fact that the probability of nucleation around the foreign particles may still be higher than elsewhere within the water droplet because of the particle-induced molecular pre-ordering (19Liu X.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001; 79: 39-41Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar). Based on the fact that this homogeneous-like nucleation occurs at low supercoolings rather than at high supercoolings as expected previously (7Hare D.E. Sorensen C.M. J. Chem. Phys. 1987; 87: 4840-4845Crossref Scopus (180) Google Scholar, 8Mullin J.W. Crystallization. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford1997: 182-194Google Scholar, 9Söhnel O. Garside J. Precipitation, Basic Principles and Industrial Application. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford1992: 41-76Google Scholar, 10Garside J. Nancollas G.H. Biological Mineralization and Demineralization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin2000: 23-35Google Scholar), this type of nucleation is then referred to as inverse homogeneous-like nucleation. We convert the curves in Fig. 2 into f(m, R′) ∼ R′ (see the caption of Fig. 3B). According to Equation 1, the slope of the ln(τV) ∼ 1/T(ΔT)2 plot is κf(m, R′). If the inverse homogeneous-like nucleation takes place (Regime III, f(m, R′) = 1), one then has κf(m, R′) = κ. It follows that the experimental f(m, R′) ∼ ΔT curve can be obtained from the ratio between the slope of the ln(τV) ∼ 1/T(ΔT)2 plot and the corresponding κ at different ΔT. Because rc can be obtained from Equation 3 and κ, one of the most challenging and important steps in obtaining f(m, R′) ∼ R′ is to estimate the average local radius Rs of the rough surface of the foreign particles (compare Equation 5 and Fig. 2). As illustrated by Fig. 3A (e.g. m = 0.8), one has approximately R′ ≈ 1 or (rc)mid ≈ Rs at the midpoint of the ln[f(m, R′)] ∼ ln(R′) curve (-ln[f(m)]/2), enabling one to estimate, according to Equation 5, Rs from (rc)mid, which can be obtained from (ΔT)mid (compare Equation 3; (ΔT)mid is the supercooling of the midpoint (-ln[f(m)]/2) of the ln[f(m, R′)] ∼ ln(ΔT) plot). The values of Rs for various systems are listed in Table I. The ln[f(m, R′)] ∼ ln(R′) plots for these systems are given in Fig. 3B.Table IThe measured transition temperature (ΔT)mid and the radius of the local curvature of foreign particles for different systemsκ(ΔT)mid(rc)mid (= RS)KnmDI water (20-nm filter)1.2 × 10839.12.16DI water (200-nm filter)1.1 × 10833.92.43AFPIII 2.5 mg/ml (20-nm filter)0.32 × 10840.31.35 Open table in a new tab To check the above approach, we will compare the estimated Rs (= (rc)mid) with known Rs values for some specific foreign particles. Note that any intentionally added foreign particles could not serve for this purpose for the following reasons: (i) because the shape of the foreign particles is irregular, Rs cannot be equated with the size of these particles (compare Fig. 1); and (ii) the pre-existing foreign particles should be inactivated to eliminate their interference in the course of the investigation and subsequent analysis. The AFPIII (from A/F Protein Canada, Inc.) was selected as a specific foreign particle. Each AFPIII molecule has both a dominant hydrophilic and a dominant hydrophobic portion (compare Fig. 4A; Ref. 20Turnbull J. J. Appl. Phys. 1950; 21: 1022-1028Crossref Scopus (1462) Google Scholar). Our latest experiments 2X.-Y. Liu and N. Du, unpublished data. show that AFPIII molecules adsorb onto and cover the surface of foreign particles by orienting their dominant hydrophobic portions outwards (compare Fig. 4B), thus interrupting the interaction between the nucleating phase (ice) and the foreign particles. This can be seen from the rise in f(m) (from curve 1 → curve 2 in Fig. 3B) after adding 0.5 mg/ml AFPIII to the DI water filtrated by a 20-nm filter. As the concentration of AFPIII begins to exceed CAFPIII = 2.5 mg/ml, the molecules start to aggregate into some hydrophilic-like clusters (Fig. 4C) with an average diameter (2Rs) ≈ 2.8 nm (see our light scattering results in Fig. 5, A and B). In their role as new foreign particles, these hydrophilic clusters lower the nucleation barrier (Fig. 3B, compare 2 with 3). In Table I, for CAFPIII = 2.5 mg/ml, the radius Rs of the foreign particles (AFPIII clusters) is estimated to be 1.42 nm, based on the ln[f(m, R′)] ∼ ln(R′) plot, which is in excellent agreement with the results given in Fig. 4B.Fig. 5The size and the size distribution of AFPIII molecules and aggregates in DI water solutions filtrated by 20-nm filters. At the AFPIII concentration of CAFPIII = 0.5 mg/ml, only mono-protein molecules (∼1.1 nm) exist in the solution. At the AFPIII concentration of CAFPIII ≥ 2.5 mg/ml, apart from a small quantity of the mono-molecules, AFPIII molecules will aggregate to form clusters with the average diameter = 2.8 nm. The results were obtained by the dynamic light-scattering method, based on a Brookhaven BI-200SM light-scattering system with an He-Ne laser (632.8 nm) source and a photomultiplier tube detector.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) The "Infinite" Nucleation Energy Barrier of the Inverse Homogeneous-like Nucleation and the Freezing Point of Water—The roughness (or Rs) of the pre-existing foreign nano-particles and their surface structural match with ice nuclei exert a profound impact on the freezing and antifreeze process, which has never been taken into account before. If the inverse homogeneous-like nucleation becomes a dominant process (Regime III), the nucleation barrier will rise drastically (compare Figs. 2 and 3B). For DI water (filtrated by a 20-nm filter), the nucleation barrier (ΔG*/kT) rises from 222 to 11,123 at ΔT = 40 K (compare with Fig. 4). Such a high nucleation barrier is almost equivalent to an "infinite" height of nucleation barrier. Because the nucleation barrier affects the nucleation rate exponentially (compare Equation 1), such a high ΔG*/kT makes the nucleation of ice in Regime III practically an impossible event at low supercoolings. Therefore, the initiation of freezing can only be possible when entering the particle-mediated nucleation regim