Analysis on the Diagnosis and Treatments of Multi——segmental Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors in Different Age Group

孙建军,王振宇,谢京城,李振东,马长城,刘彬,陈晓东,于涛,张嘉,赵继宗
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15932/j.0253-9713.2010.05.030
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare and analyze different properties of multi-segmental intramedullary spinal cord tumors,including the location,the histological classification,the extent of tumor removal,and the prognosis in different age groups.Methods Between Jan.2002 and Dec.2009,78 patients with multi-segmental intramedullary spinal cord tumors were admitted to the neurosurgery inpatient department of Peking University Third Hospital.Patients younger than 18 year-old or 18 year-old were grouped into the adolescent group and patients older than 18-year-old were grouped into the adult group.Seventy-seven patients underwent microsurgery for the intramedullary spinal cord tumor using a posterior approach.The histological classifications and grades of tumors were determined by HE and Immunohistochemical staining.Preoperative and postoperative neurological function was scored using the Improved JOA(IJOA) scoring system.The prognosis was evaluated with IJOA difference values of patients.Data analysis was performed using SPSS 11.0(SPSS,Chicago,USA).Results The difference in the histological classification of tumors(Z=-2.13,P=0.03)and IJOA difference values grading of patients(Z=-2.06,P=0.04) between the two groups was statistically significant.Benign glioma,mostly astrocytoma Ⅰ-Ⅱ,and neurodevelopmental tumor were predominant in the adolescent group and ependymoma where predominant in the adult group.The adolescent group had a better short-term prognosis than the adult group.Conclusions Multi-segmental intramedullary spinal cord benign glioma and neurodevelopmental tumor are predominant in the adolescent patients and has a relatively better short-term prognosis.On the contrary,ependymoma is predominant in the adult patients and has a relatively worse short-term prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?