Abstract:[1] We have investigated the thermospheric and ionospheric response to the 14-15 December 2006 geomagnetic storm using a Coupled Magnetosphere Ionosphere Thermosphere (CMIT) 2.0 model simulation. In this paper we focus on observations and simulations during the initial phase of the storm (about 8 h), when the shock was driving changes in geospace. The global ionospheric maps of total electron content (TEC), ionosonde data at four stations and Millstone Hill incoherent scatter radar (ISR) observations are compared with the corresponding simulation results from the CMIT model. The observations showed significant positive storm effects occurred in the Atlantic sector after the onset of this storm. The CMIT model is able to capture the temporal and spatial variations of the ionospheric storm effects seen in the GPS TEC observations, although the model slightly underestimates the daytime positive ionospheric storm in the South American sector. The simulations are also in agreement with the ionosonde and ISR ionospheric measurements. Term analysis of the ion continuity equation demonstrates that changes in the electric fields play a dominant role in generating the observed ionospheric positive storm effect in the American sector during the initial phase, although neutral winds and composition changes also contribute. The difference in the strength of the enhancements over North and South America can be explained by the slope of the topside electron density profiles in the two hemispheres. In the southern hemisphere electron densities decrease slowly with altitude, whereas the decrease is much more rapid in the northern (winter) hemisphere. The electric fields, therefore, cannot cause large increases in electron density by uplifting the plasma, so positive storm effects are small in the southern hemisphere compared with the northern hemisphere, even though the increase in h(m)F(2) is greater in the southern hemisphere. Nighttime changes in electron density in other longitude sectors are small, because the topside electron densities also decrease slowly with altitude at night.

Responses of the ionospheric electric field to the sheath region of ICME: A case study

Interplanetary Drivers of Ionospheric Prompt Penetration Electric Fields

Geomagnetic responses in high latitudes during the storm of july 15—16, 2000

Observations and simulations of the ionospheric and thermospheric response to the December 2006 geomagnetic storm: Initial phase

Ionospheric Response to the Initial Phase of Geomagnetic Storms: Common Features

Energy transfer during intense geomagnetic storms driven by interplanetary coronal mass ejections and their sheath regions

Regional differences of the ionospheric response to the July 2012 geomagnetic storm

Ionospheric electric field variations during a geomagnetic storm simulated by a coupled magnetosphere ionosphere thermosphere (CMIT) model

Statistical Properties and Geoefficiency of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheaths During Intense Geomagnetic Storms

Observations and simulations of quasiperiodic ionospheric oscillations and large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances during the December 2006 geomagnetic storm

OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF IONOSPHERIC TEC DURING THE MAGNETIC STORM ON APRIL 6-8,2000

Persistence of the Long‐Duration Daytime TEC Enhancements at Different Longitudinal Sectors During the August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm

Multiple-Band Electric Field Response to the Geomagnetic Storm on 4 November 2021

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Statistical comparison of the ICME’s geoeffectiveness of different types and different solar phases from 1995 to 2014

Magnetic Cloud and Sheath in the Ground-level Enhancement Event of 2000 July 14. I. Effects on the Solar Energetic Particles

Importance of Shock Compression in Enhancing ICME’s Geoeffectiveness

Contribution of the Topside and Bottomside Ionosphere to the Total Electron Content During Two Strong Geomagnetic Storms

Multi-Instrument Observation of the Ionospheric Irregularities and Disturbances during the 23–24 March 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Dayside Magnetospheric and Ionospheric Responses to Solar Wind Pressure Increase: Multispacecraft and Ground Observations

Westward ionospheric electric field perturbations on the dayside associated with substorm processes

Magnetic cloud boundary layer of 9 November 2004 and its associated space weather effects