Positive Sampling Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements in Roadside Environment

Yan Cheng,Shun Cheng Lee,Kin Fai Ho,Kochy Fung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1140-1
IF: 3.307
2009-01-01
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Abstract:The positive artifacts in particulate organic carbon measurements in a roadside environment were characterized using two filters in tandem. The experiments were performed for PM1.0, PM2.5, and PM10 at 24-h interval using a URG sampler, followed by organic carbon (OC)/ elemental carbon (EC) analysis by the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis protocol. The OC concentrations, derived from the quartz filter behind a front quartz filter, were quite similar for PM1.0, PM2.5, and PM10, ranging from 0.6 to 2.7 μg C m − 3 for PM1.0, from 0.7 to 2.7 μg C m − 3 for PM2.5, and from 1.1 to 2.7 μg C m − 3 for PM10. They were respectively ~2.8%, ~2.4%, and ~1.6% of the particulate mass. The most abundant species on the backup quartz filters were OC2 (250°C) and OC3 (450°C), accounting for ~80% of measured organic carbon on the backup quartz filters. It indicates the filter artifacts are mainly composed of adsorbed semi-volatile organics (below the analysis temperature of 450°C) including gaseous and particulate phase; the loading of artifacts depends on the nature of vapor and its interaction with filter substrate, rather than particle sizes. The uncorrected OC/EC ratios on the front quartz filters were ~10% higher than the corrected OC/EC ratios by positive organic artifacts in winter, and it is ~20% higher in summer. Another finding is that the separation distance of the front and backup filters influence the level of artifacts assessed by the backup filter.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?