Portasystemic Shunt Vs Gastroesophageal Devascularization for Treatment of Portal Hypertension: One Meta-analysis

蒋安,李宗芳,王志东,周蕊,黎一鸣,杨正安,普彦淞,郭彦锋
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-0793.2010.01.024
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To systematically evaluate the therapeutic effect of portasystemic shunt (PSS) and gastroesophageal devascularization (GD) on portal hypertension (PH) after liver cirrhosis. Methods The literatures about the therapeutic effect of PSS and GD on PH after cirrhosis were collected from Medline, Elsevier, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases from 1989 to 2008. RevMan 5.0 software was used for data analysis. Results According to the included criteria, 10 clinical trials were selected finally. The combined results of Meta-analysis with fixed effect model showed that the Operative Mortality was similar [RR=1.04, 95% CI(0.74-1.47), P >0.05]; Recurrent variceal bleeding rate of PSS was lower than GD[RR=0.48, 95% CI(0.39-0.59), P<0.01]; Encephalopathy rate of PSS was higher than GD[RR=2.85, 95% CI(2.14-3.80), P<0.01], while post operative mortality of PSS was higher than GD[RR=1.25, 95% CI(1.01-1.55), P<0.05]. Conclusion PSS and GD may be used in the treatment of PH, but in comparing with PSS, GD has a better effect on PH after cirrhosis. Key words: Hypertension, portal; Treatment; Varicose vein; Hepatic encephalopathy; Mortality; Meta- analysis
What problem does this paper attempt to address?