Cardiac electrophysiologic effects of intravenous ibutilide compared with intravenous propafenone in patients with rencent-onset atrial fibrilation

Chao SUN,Shu-wang LIU,Jing-xuan GUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13333/j.cnki.cjcpe.2011.03.036
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study is to compare cardiac electrophysiologic and antifibrillatory effects of ibutilide with that of propafenone(introvenously) in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation(AF).Methods Thirty-seven patients with AF of less than 4 days′ duration were randomized into two groups.Group A(n=17) received ibutilide 1mg,while Group B(n=20) were treated with propafenone 70 mg.If sinus rhythm was not present 10 minutes after the first infusion,a second infusion of the same dose was given.Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring was performed and 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded before dosing and at defined times from the start of infusion to 4 hours after dosing.Results In Group A,11 patients(64.7%) converted into sinus rhythm compared with 9 patients(45%) in Group B(P>0.05).The mean peak QTc interval in Group A was significantly prolonged within 90 minutes after ibutilide administration(P<0.001),while it was of no change in Group B with propafenone treatment(P>0.05).However,a significant increase in the average peak QRS duration could be seen after dosing in Group B(P<0.01).The most serious side effect was polymorphic ventricular tachycardia,which occurred in a patient immediately after the first infusion of ibutilide concluded.Sinus bradycardia and an excessively prolonged QTc were observed in the case.Conclusion Ibutilide and propafenone are equally effective in conversion of recent-onset AF to sinus rhythm.Ibutilide significantly prolongs ventricular repolarization,which may contribute to the onset of severe ventriocular tachycardia.Propafenone has no effects on QT interval,however it prolongs ventricular depolarization.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?