Abstract:Over the last forty years, China has experienced extraordinary growth under output market reforms, but the growth rates are now tapering off. Reforms in factor markets and city governance have been much slower and are viewed as having the potential to yield considerable efficiency gains. In this paper, we explore this possibility, tackling the key issues of local political manipulation of land markets and objectives of local leaders, constraints on the local budgetary process to finance infrastructure and capital market favoritism of certain cities. We use a structural general equilibrium model with trade and migration frictions, based on prefecture level data. We model the political process of land misallocation within cities which drives up housing prices and estimate city-by-city local leaders’ preferences over economic performance versus residents’ welfare. Counterfactual analysis shows that equalizing capital prices across cities, changing the political scorecard for city leaders to reward just maximization of local consumer welfare, and relaxing local budget constraints together increase welfare of consumers and returns to capital by 13.7% and 2.25% respectively. Housing prices would decline in almost all cities; and the reforms would reduce the current excessive, often showcase investment in local public infrastructure by 49% nationally. These reforms would significantly reduce the population of favored cities with low capital costs like Tianjin and Beijing and raise the population of cities with high costs of capital and low local-leader weights on consumer welfare like Shenzhen and Dongguan.

Resource Misallocation and Political Cycles

The Misallocation Cost of Inefficient Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China

Chinese Political and Economic Governance System and the Imbalance Between Consumption and Investment

The Chinese‐style Macroeconomic Control: the Role of State‐owned Enterprises

Political Budget Cycles in China: Corruption, Incentive Role and Time Inconsistency

Political Cycles and the Mix of Industrial and Residential Land Leasing

Resource misallocation in China: Biased subsidies versus credit discrimination

Excess Liquidity and Credit Misallocation: Evidence from China

Impact of Structural Distortions on Resource Allocation in China: Evidence from an Innovative Empirical Model

Political manipulation of urban land markets: Evidence from China

Capability and Opportunism: Evidence from City Officials in China

Land Cronyism and Corporate Political Cycles in China

Political Connections, Government Subsidies, and Capital Misallocation: Evidence from China

Promotion Incentive: Corruption and Its Implications on Political Budget Cycles in China

Political Incentives, Bureaucratic Behaviors and Political Budget Cycles in China

Promotion Incentive: Corruption and Its Implications on Local Fiscal Cycles in China

The Costs of Political Manipulation of Factor Markets in China

Local Political Chief Turnover and Economic Growth: Evidence from China

The misallocation of finance in China

Effects of Land Finance on Resource Misallocation in Chinese Cities during 2003–2017: A Dynamic Panel Econometric Analysis

Economic growth of cities: Does resource allocation matter?