Fictive interaction blends in everyday life and courtroom settings

Esther Pascual
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.170.04pas
2008-01-01
Abstract:This chapter deals with 'fictive interaction blends' (Pascual 2002), namely simplex blends structured by the frame of the ordinary face-to-face conversation. Fictive interaction is presented as the unifying pattern underlying blends previously analyzed separately. A parallel is drawn between these and blending examples from legal settings, representing the different trial phases. These involve the conceptualization and presentation of: (i) attorneys' serial monologues as simultaneous turn-taking; (ii) legal evidence as speaking; and (iii) the verdict as an audible message. The examples discussed appear at the levels of the discourse structure and content, the sentence and the grammatical constituent. I conclude that the conversation frame as well as the subframe of the fictive trialogue constitute fundamental structures of thought, language, and discourse.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?