Abstract:Forensic examiners have come under scrutiny due to high-profile exonerations, highlighting the consequences that contextual bias can have on investigations. Researchers have proposed solutions to reduce the effects of bias including blind testing and redacting task-irrelevant information. Practitioners have concerns over the limitations of some of this research that uses untrained students to examine complex pieces of forensic evidence (e.g., fingerprints) (1; but see 2 for studies including trained experts and/or actual casework). This study sought to (a) examine the effect of contextual bias on examiners' evaluation of forensic evidence by varying the amount of pre-comparison information available to participants, (b) compare student and expert examiners' performance and their vulnerability to contextual bias, and (c) examine the effects of contextual bias on examiners' evaluation of different types of forensic evidence. Expert fingerprint examiners and student participants were presented with varying amounts of pre-comparison case information and compared matching and non-matching fingerprint and footwear impression evidence. Results suggest no effects of blinding examiners from case information or redacting task-irrelevant information. As expected, expert fingerprint examiners were more likely to correctly identify matching fingerprints and correctly exclude non-matching fingerprints than students. However, expert fingerprint examiners were no better than student participants at comparing footwear impression evidence. These findings suggest that sample, stimulus selection, and discipline-specific training matter when investigating bias in forensic decision making. These findings suggest caution when using forensic stimuli with student samples to investigate forensic decision-making and highlight the need for more research on redaction procedures.

A Research on Expert Opinion and "Preventing Post-decision Disputes"

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

On Suggestion of Expert in Justice

On Coping Mechanisms of Procuratorate for the Public Opinion-Related Cases

On the Examination and Determination of Forensic Appraisal Opinions

A causing factor analysis of divergence in forensic psychiatric exper tise

Demonstrative Study on Present Anglo-American Misjudged Criminal Cases

Field Research Report on Forensic Examination on Mental Disorder

The Perplexity of Medical Expert Appearing in Court: Legal Thinking and Ethical Reflection

Revise of identification system in medical malpractice cases

A Research on the Effect of Public Opinion on Judicial Fairness in Criminal Cases

Thoughts on Perfecting the Chinese Criminal Identification System

Expert Testimony System in Britain & America and Establishment of Expert Testimony System in China

The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis

Pathological Study on 18 Cases of Forensic Re-Autopsy and Histopathological Re-Examination

Contesting Confessions: Opinions of Expert Witnesses

Do inconclusive forensic decisions disadvantage the innocent?

Field research report on the important problems of criminal evidence system

On the Criteria for Evaluating an Expert's Opinion and Forensic Methods by Participants in the Legal Proceedings

The Validity of Appraisal Conclusions as Evidence