Abstract:Purpose: This work presents a method for fast volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) adaptation in response to interfraction anatomical variations. Additionally, plan parameters extracted from the adapted plans are used to verify the quality of these plans. The methods were tested as a prostate class solution and compared to replanning and to their current clinical practice. Methods: The proposed VMAT adaptation is an extension of their previous intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) adaptation. It follows a direct (forward) planning approach: the multileaf collimator (MLC) apertures are corrected in the beam's eye view (BEV) and the monitor units (MUs) are corrected using point dose calculations. All MLC and MU corrections are driven by the positions of four fiducial points only, without need for a full contour set. Quality assurance (QA) of the adapted plans is performed using plan parameters that can be calculated online and that have a relation to the delivered dose or the plan quality. Five potential parameters are studied for this purpose: the number of MU, the equivalent field size (EqFS), the modulation complexity score (MCS), and the components of the Mcs: the aperture area variability (AAV) and the leaf sequence variability (LSV). The full adaptation and its separate steps were evaluated in simulation experiments involving a prostate phantom subjected to various interfraction transformations. The efficacy of the current VMAT adaptation was scored by target mean dose (CTVmean), conformity (CI95%), tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). The impact of the adaptation on the plan parameters (QA) was assessed by comparison with prediction intervals (PI) derived from a statistical model of the typical variation of these parameters in a population of VMAT prostate plans (n = 63). These prediction intervals are the adaptation equivalent of the tolerance tables for couch shifts in the current clinical practice. Results: The proposed adaptation of a two-arc VMAT plan resulted in the intended CTVmean (Δ ≤ 3%) and TCP (ΔTCP ≤ 0.001). Moreover, the method assures the intended CI95% (Δ ≤ 11%) resulting in lowered rectal NTCP for all cases. Compared to replanning, their adaptation is faster (13 s vs 10 min) and more intuitive. Compared to the current clinical practice, it has a better protection of the healthy tissue. Compared to IMRT, VMAT is more robust to anatomical variations, but it is also less sensitive to the different correction steps. The observed variations of the plan parameters in their database included a linear dependence on the date of treatment planning and on the target radius. The MCS is not retained as QA metric due to a contrasting behavior of its components (LSV and AAV). If three out of four plan parameters (MU, EqFS, AAV, and LSV) need to lie inside a 50% prediction interval (3/4-50%PI), all adapted plans will be accepted. In contrast, all replanned plans do not meet this loose criterion, mainly because they have no connection to the initially optimized and verified plan. Conclusions: A direct (forward) VMAT adaptation performs equally well as (inverse) replanning but is faster and can be extended to real-time adaptation. The prediction intervals for the machine parameters are equivalent to the tolerance tables for couch shifts in the current clinical practice. A 3/4-50%PI QA criterion accepts all the adapted plans but rejects all the replanned plans.

Automatic Verification of Plan Data Transfer for Online Adaptive Radiotherapy

MR‐linac daily semi‐automated end‐to‐end quality control verification

Study of an Online Plan Verification Method and the Sensitivity of Plan Delivery Accuracy to Different Beam Parameter Errors in Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy

Quality assurance of an established online adaptive radiotherapy program: patch and software upgrade

Initial Clinical Experience of Patient-Specific QA of Treatment Delivery in Online Adaptive Radiotherapy Using a 1.5 T MR-Linac.

Automated contouring, treatment planning, and quality assurance for VMAT craniospinal irradiation (VMAT-CSI)

Replacing manual planning with automatic iterative planning for locally advanced rectal cancer VMAT treatment

Experience with patient-specific quality assurance of dosimetrist-led online adaptive prostate SBRT

Validation of Fully Automated VMAT Plan Generation for Library-Based Plan-of-the-Day Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy

Online adaptation and verification of VMAT

Safety and Efficiency Analysis of Operational Decision-Making During CBCT-Based Online Adaptive Radiotherapy

Automatizing a non-scripting TPS for optimizing clinical workflow and re-optimization of IMRT/VMAT plans

A Clinically Relevant Online Patient QA Solution with Daily CT Scans and EPID-basedin Vivodosimetry: a Feasibility Study on Rectal Cancer.

Assessing the robustness of artificial intelligence powered planning tools in radiotherapy clinical settings-a phantom simulation approach

SU-E-T-154: Online Dose Verification with Gafchromic Film for Fixed-Gantry and Rotational Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: A Phantom Study.

A clinically relevant online patient QA solution with daily CT scans and EPID-based in vivo dosimetry: A feasible study on rectal cancer

Quality assurance for online adaptive radiotherapy: a secondary dose verification model with geometry-encoded U-Net

Treatment plan quality during online adaptive re-planning

Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife

Automated Planning Of Whole Breast Irradiation Using Hybrid Imrt Improves Efficiency And Quality

Automatic Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Direct Three-Dimensional Patient Anatomy Match.