Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical outcome of anterolateral minimally invasive approach versus conventional posterior approach for total hip replacement against femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.METHODS:The retrospective study was carried out on 42 patients who suffered from displaced femoral neck fractures (19 cases of Garden type III, 23 cases of Garden type IV) treated by total hip replacement via anterolateral minimally invasive approach or conventional posterior approach by the same experienced surgeon. The average age of the patients was 78.1 years (range: 65-89 years). They were divided into anterolateral mini-invasive group (22 cases) and posterior group (20 cases). The mean time of follow-up was 13 months (range: 6-36 months). The anterolateral approach described by Hardinge goes through between anterior 1/3 and posterior 2/3 of the gluteus medius muscle, reaching the femoral neck from anterior capsule. The traditional posterior approach described by Moore (Southern incision) goes through the insertions of short external rotation muscles, reaching the femoral neck from posterior capsule. The related variables under observation were length of incision, operation time, postoperative limp, length of hospital stay and bed stay and dislolcation rate.RESULTS:The length of the skin incision varied between 7 cm and 12 cm with the anterolateral minimally invasive technique, compared to 15-22 cm in the conventional procedure. It took less time (average 15 minutes) to complete the anterolateral minimally invasive approach (72 min+/-15 min), compared with the conventional approach (87 min+/-10 min). The average Harris hip score was 91.23+/-10.20 in anterolateral approach, 90.03+/-11.05 in the posterior approach. The average length of hospital stay for patients with the anterolateral approach was (6.4+/-2.2) days (range: 4-9 days), while that in posterior approach was (9.2+/-3.1) days (range: 6-13 days). The average length of bed stay was (3.4+/-1.1) days (range: 2-5 days) in anterolateral group and (6.2+/-2.8) days (range: 3-10 days) in posterior group. No patients in anterolateral group experienced dislocation. One (5%) hip in posterior approach had dislocation.CONCLUSIONS:Anterolateral mini-invasive approach can decrease trauma, operation time, length of hospital stay and bed stay and rehabilitation time. The stability and minimal muscular damage permit the acceleration of postoperative rehabilitation, which can subsequently reduce the perioperative risk in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly undergoing total hip replacement.

Control Study of Short-Term Curative Effect of Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Metal-on-metal Large-Diameter Femoral Head for the Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures

[Mid-Term Follow-Up Study of Hip Arthroplasty for Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly].

Short term effect of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treating advanced hip disease

[Mid-Term Effectiveness of Large-Head Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty].

[Clinical Apprehension on Application of Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty with Large Diameter Heads].

Short-term Effects of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Metal-on-metal Prosthesis with Large Diameter Femoral Head

Total hip arthroplasty with posterior minimal incision for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the aged people

Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients performed with a minimally invasive direct lateral approach versus the standard lateral approach

Clinical application and therapeutic effectiveness of large diameter heads metal-on-metal total hip replacement

Study on the efficacy of total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients

Minimally Invasive Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Management of Femoral Neck Fractures in Older Patients

Treatment of femoral neck fractures with posterolateral mini-incision total hip arthroplasty

Comparison of short-term efficacy of total hip arthroplasty using prosthesis with metal-on-metal versus metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces

Mini-incision Total Hip Replacement for Femoral Neck Fracture in Senile Patients

Comparative Study of Anterolateral Approach Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Replacement in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients

Therapeutic Observation of Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty in 36 Cases of Femoral Head Necrosis Patients under 50-Year-old

Clinical Results of Arthroscopic Suture for Meniscal Tear in Middle Aged Adults

Analysis of clinical therapeutic effect of total hip arthroplasty with collum femoris preserving for treating hip joint disease

Minimally Invasive Two-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Short-Term Retrospective Report of 27 Cases

Short-term Results of Total Hip Replacement with Metal-on-metal Bearings and a Large Diameter Femoral Head

[Mid- and Long-Term Effectiveness and Failure Causes Analysis of Large-Head Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty].