Effect of Two Improving Measures Based on Returning Phragmites communis Straw on Soil Phy-chemical Properties and Microbial Respiration of the Reclaimed Lands in Chongming Dongtan,China

CHEN Jin-hai,LI Yan-li,WANG Lei,ZHANG Wen-quan,WANG Hong-li,FU Xiao-hua,LE Yi-quan,GUAN Yong-jian,QIU Zhong-hong
2011-01-01
Abstract:Returning crop straw to land is generally an important measure to soil improvement.Phragmites communis is the most plentiful straw resource in Chongming Island,China.However,few studies on returning Phragmites communis straw and its soil improving effect have been reported.In the experiment,three experimental fields in Chongming Dongtan were selected to study the effect of two improving measures based on returning Phragmites communis straw(measure I:returning Phragmites communis straw plus tillage and fertilization;measure Ⅱ:returning Phragmites communis straw after composting plus tillage and fertilization) on phy-chemical properties and microbial respiration of saline-alkali soil.In addition,the principal components analysis(PCA) was used to evaluate the comprehensive soil improving effect of the two improving measures.The results showed that both measure I and measure Ⅱ could significantly increase soil nutrient,e.g.TN、TP、TK by 48%、48%、19% and 24%、74%、105%,and soil organic carbon by 10.8% and 10.9%,in comparison with the control.Plant biomass was as 3.44 times and 1.67 times high as that in the control,but soil microbial respiration increased by only 14% and 43%.The PCA results indicated that synthetic scores of the control,measure Ⅰ and measure Ⅱ were-0.641,0.260 and 0.381 respectively when just considering the traditional soil fertility index.However,after adding soil carbon turnover index,such as soil microbial respiration and plant biomass,the synthetic scores were-1.011、0.644 and 0.367,respectively.Therefore,measure Ⅱ was the optimal mode in the view of the traditional standard,but when taking soil microbial respiration and plant biomass into accounts,the score of measureⅠ was higher than measure Ⅱ.Thus,measure Ⅰ was relatively a low carbon improving mode.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?