Abstract:Model validation is the most important part of building a supervised model. For building a model with good generalization performance one must have a sensible data splitting strategy, and this is crucial for model validation. In this study, we conducted a comparative study on various reported data splitting methods. The MixSim model was employed to generate nine simulated datasets with different probabilities of mis-classification and variable sample sizes. Then partial least squares for discriminant analysis and support vector machines for classification were applied to these datasets. Data splitting methods tested included variants of cross-validation, bootstrapping, bootstrapped Latin partition, Kennard-Stone algorithm (K-S) and sample set partitioning based on joint X–Y distances algorithm (SPXY). These methods were employed to split the data into training and validation sets. The estimated generalization performances from the validation sets were then compared with the ones obtained from the blind test sets which were generated from the same distribution but were unseen by the training/validation procedure used in model construction. The results showed that the size of the data is the deciding factor for the qualities of the generalization performance estimated from the validation set. We found that there was a significant gap between the performance estimated from the validation set and the one from the test set for the all the data splitting methods employed on small datasets. Such disparity decreased when more samples were available for training/validation, and this is because the models were then moving towards approximations of the central limit theory for the simulated datasets used. We also found that having too many or too few samples in the training set had a negative effect on the estimated model performance, suggesting that it is necessary to have a good balance between the sizes of training set and validation set to have a reliable estimation of model performance. We also found that systematic sampling method such as K-S and SPXY generally had very poor estimation of the model performance, most likely due to the fact that they are designed to take the most representative samples first and thus left a rather poorly representative sample set for model performance estimation.

Impact Analysis of Classification Performance for Cross-Validation of Imbalance Spliting Data

An Unbalanced Dataset Classification Approach Based On V-Support Vector Machine

On Splitting Training and Validation Set: A Comparative Study of Cross-Validation, Bootstrap and Systematic Sampling for Estimating the Generalization Performance of Supervised Learning

A type of balanced repeated half sampling cross validations

Model Selection by Balanced 7×2 Crossvalidation

A Novel Imbalanced Data Classification Method Based on Weakly Supervised Learning for Fault Diagnosis

Distributional bias compromises leave-one-out cross-validation

Optimization of Classification Algorithms Performance with k-Fold Cross Validation

Is Cross-Validation the Gold Standard to Evaluate Model Performance?

Subsampling Bias and The Best-Discrepancy Systematic Cross Validation

Block-Regularized M × 2 Cross-Validated Estimator of the Generalization Error

An Efficient Data Partitioning to Improve Classification Performance While Keeping Parameters Interpretable

Is K-fold cross validation the best model selection method for Machine Learning?

Classification effects of classification algorithms in imbalanced data of different sample sizes and class-distribution

An Empirical Study on the Joint Impact of Feature Selection and Data Re-sampling on Imbalance Classification

Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?

Blocked 3×2 Cross-Validated T-Test for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms

On The Smoothness of Cross-Validation-Based Estimators Of Classifier Performance

Cross-Validated Variable Selection in Tree-Based Methods Improves Predictive Performance

A Comparative Study of the Use of Stratified Cross-Validation and Distribution-Balanced Stratified Cross-Validation in Imbalanced Learning

An Empirical Study on the Joint Impact of Feature Selection and Data Resampling on Imbalance Classification