Clinical Comparison and Research of Four Methods of Treatment to Middle-Part Radius and Ulna Fracture

Xiao-feng ZHANG,Xiao-lin LI,Guo-ping SHEN,Yi LUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2011.07.018
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective A prospective study to compare the effect of using four methods of treatment to middle-part radius and ulna fracture,in order to select the best clinical pathway.Methods We have treated 87 cases of mid-radius and ulna fracture cases from September 2004 to March 2008.These patients were divided into four groups:Double-plate fixation group(A group),Double-intramedullary nail fixation group(B group),ulnar plate and radial intramedullary nail group(C group),ulnar intramedullary nailing and radial plate group(D group),A group 21 cases,B group 22 cases,C group 21 cases,D group 23 cases.we analyze and compare its operation time,wound size and degree of periosteal stripping,postoperative complications,observe fracture healing by X-ray films per month,assess functional recovery according to Anderson marking and statistical analysis.Results All 87 patients received follow-up,from 12 months to 26 months,average:23.4 months.In evaluation of the surgical trauma,B,C,D group is a less degree than group A.Complications:D group incidence rate is less than the other three groups.In 87 cases of fracture,84 patients were healed,3 cases of nonunion.Anderson scores:A group:excellent in 11 cases,better in 3 case,good in 5 cases and failed in 2 cases,B group:excellent in 11 cases,better in 5 cases,good in 5 cases,1 case of failure (nonunion).C:excellent in 14 cases,better in 3 cases,good in 4 cases.D group were excellent in 20 cases,better in 2 cases.good in 1 cases.D group healing rate and function scores were significantly higher than the A group,B group,C group (P0.05).Conclusions Four methods of treatment to middle-part radius and ulna fracture were access to a higher rate of fracture healing and functional score.But ulnar intramedullary nailing and radial plate group was recommended as the preferred method because of the operation was simple,fewer trauma and complications,higher fracture healing rate and functional recovery,achieve the best combination in the biomechanical and biological fixation.So it is recommended as the suitable method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?