Research on Extraction of FeO and TiO2 Contents of the Sinus Iridum Region Based on Optical Remote Sensing Data

XiaoXing LUO,XianFeng ZHOU,YunZhao WU,ZhenChao WANG,ShuHe ZHAO,Qiao XUE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/132012-867
2013-01-01
Abstract:The extraction of iron and titanium contents of lunar surface is of great importance to both researches of origin and development of the Moon and exploitation and utilization of lunar resource. Iron and titanium contents extracted by various optical data are always different, it is necessary to obtain these contents through multiple optical data and analyze these results. This paper makes use of data from different optical periods (OP1B, OP2C) of Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) onboard Chandrayaan-1 and two calibrated data sets (pc1, pc2) of Interference Imaging Spectrometer (IIM) onboard Chang’E-1 to extract iron and titanium contents of the Sinus Iridum region. The results are as followed: FeO peak value obtained by OP1B and OP2C is 17.80wt% and 17.60wt% respectively, which is higher than pc1’s 15.80wt% and pc2’s 14.00wt%. FeO average value achieved by OP1B and OP2C is 16.91wt% and 16.79wt% respectively, higher than pc1’s 14.11wt% and pc2’s 13.46wt%. 0wt%-4wt% titanium contents percentage acquired by OP2C is 74.46%, higher than pc1’s 54.66% and pc2’s 62.46%, while OP1B’s is 37.55%. TiO2 average value obtained by OP1B and OP2C is 5.35 wt% and 3.16wt% respectively. TiO2 average value achieved by pc1 and pc2 is 4.25wt% and 3.65wt% respectively. Very low and low titanium basalt of the Sinus Iridum area nearly approach 50% and 40% respectively, which mainly locate on Im1 and Im2 units. High titanium basalt that account for nearly 10% percentage locates on EIm unit. On the whole, titanium content of basalt obtained by optical data show a unimodal distribution, low titanium basalt dominates, which differs from the bimodal distribution of the samples’ titanium. Iron and titanium contents of the Sinus Iridum’s basalt, with its age become younger, present a growing tendency. Among the four data sets, the photometric calibration of pc2 data is the best, the precision of photometric calibration of pc1 is rather low, the reflectance of various optical periods of M3 differs, and the precision of photometric calibration of M3 data from different optical periods needs to be improved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?