Medium-term results of two-staged revision surgery for infected total hip arthroplasty

GU Wen-jun,WU Hai-shan,WU Yu-li,LI Xiao-hua,ZHAO Hui,WANG Bo,FU Pei-liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2012.06.002
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To discuss the medium-term results of two-staged revision surgery for the treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty. Methods 22 patients (22 hips) were enrolled in this study between January, 2004 and December, 2007. The treatment protocol consisted of a two-stage surgery with removal of infected components, insertion of an antibiotic impregnated cement spacer and re-implantation of an uncemented or cemented prosthesis. Patients were assessed for infection recurrence, pain (visual analog scale ) and hip joint function (Harris Hip score). Results The average duration of follow-up was (6.6±1.8) (range,5-8) years; all 22 hips were successfully converted to prosthesis in an average time of 4.2 months after spacer implantation. There was no case of recurrent prosthetic infection. No patient had required revision for aseptic loosening or dislocation on the femoral side. The mean VAS pain score improved from 7.2 (range,5-9.1) pre-operatively to 3.8 (range,1.2-5.3) before to spacer removal and to 1.2 (range,0-3.2) at the last follow-up assessment after prosthesis implantation. The average Harris Hip score improved from 36.4 (range,20-49)before surgery, to 56.3 (range,40-66) between the two stages, and 84.2 (range,72-93) at the final follow-up assessment. Conclusions Two-stage total hip revision with antibiotic impregnated cement spacer could provid reliable solution in the medium-term follow-up for septic arthritis of the hip and may be offered to patients as a valuable treatment option.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?