Abstract:Introduction The appreciations of curve flexibility and segmental mobility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are important for determining structural curves, defining the safe range of correction, selecting the segment length for fusion, determining the most appropriate surgical procedure, and predicting the results of correction. However, the role of disc wedging in predicting spinal flexibility has not been well defined. The objective of this study was, therefore, to investigate the effect of disc wedging on curve flexibility and gain insight into segmental mobility by comparing disc wedging in upright and side bending radiographs in thoracic AIS. Patients and Methods This study included a total of 116 consecutive patients with AIS with main thoracic curve. According to thoracic curve flexibility index (TCFI), 56 patients with TCFI < 50% were assigned to group A (Stiff), and the other 60 patients with TCFI ≥ 50% were assigned to group B (Flexible). Age, curve magnitude, disc wedging, and disc wedging percentage were compared between the two groups. Segmental flexibility indices ([upright disc angle-bending disc angle]/[upright disc angle]) were computed and compared between periapical and remote levels. Correlations were estimated using Pearson correlation coefficients. After adjustment of covariates, logistic multivariate regression analysis of independent factors for TCFI was performed. Results Significant differences with respect to the age and curve magnitude were observed between the two groups (16.33 ± 3.08 vs. 13.50 ± 1.97, p < 0.01 and 56.06 ± 8.34 vs. 48.60 ± 7.87 degrees). The wedging angle and wedging percentage of discs in group B were significantly higher than those in group A (21.86 ± 6.18 vs. 17.52 ± 6.37 degrees, p < 0.01 and 43.55% ± 8.5 vs. 26.56% ± 9.1, p < 0.01). There was a significant correlation between disc wedging percentage and TCFI ( r = 0.766, p = 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the disc wedging percentage was the single greatest predictor of TCFI. And the disc wedging showed symmetric periapical distribution with significant decrease (all p values < 0.01) for every cephalad (+) and caudad (−) level change. The apical level +1 and −1 wedged at 6.3 and 6.7 degrees (range, 3.5–10.8 degrees), respectively. We noted mean periapical flexibility indices of 41% (+1), 44% (−1), 53% (+2) and 97% (−2), which were significantly less ( p < 0.01) than for the group of remote levels 90% (+3), 160% (−3), 116% (+4), and 208% (−4). Conclusion Disc wedging contributes to the spinal flexibility in thoracic AIS. The average flexibility indices of the periapical discs are significantly less than that of the remote discs. These may offer useful information in the evaluation of surgical options and preoperative planning.

Contributions of Vertebral and Disc Wedging to the Cobb Angle in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Different Curve Pattern:Radiographic Discrepancy and Clinical Significance

Disc and vertebral wedging and their clinical significance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and neurological scoliosis

Comparison of Disc and Vertebral Wedging Between Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Chiari Malformation-Associated Scoliosis.

Contribution of Sagittal Orientation of Facet Joints and Disc Degeneration to Degenerative Spondylolisthesis in Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Research

Does Disc Wedging Contribute to the Flexibility of Thoracic Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

The Relative Contribution of Intervertebral Disc and Vertebral Wedging to the Development of Thoracic Kyphosis and Lumbar Lordosis in Asymptomatic Adolescents

Vertebral Body or Intervertebral Disc Wedging

Discrepancy of vertebral and disc wedging between porcine scoliosis model and early onset scoliosis in humans

The Morphological Abnormalities of Pedicles and Spinal Canal in the Apical Region of Adolescent Idiopathic Thoracic Scoliosis

Progression of vertebral and disc wedging in immature porcine scoliosis model and its significance

Axial rotation of the pelvis and its influencing factors in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with primary thoracic curve

Analysis of the relationship between coronal and sagittal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Disc and Vertebral Responses in the Unfused Lumbar Curve to Selective Thoracic Fusion in Lenke 1B/1C Scoliosis

[Clinical Study of the Cobb+1 to Cobb Fusion Strategy for Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with the Lower Lumbar Apex].

Comparison of the Orientation of the Lumbar Facet Joints Between Adolescent Idiopathic Lumbar Scoliosis and Normal Adolescent Subjects

Use of the sagittal Cobb* angle to guide the rod bending in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective clinical study

The Thoracic Vertebrae Development Character of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Druing Puberty :A Computerized Tomographic Study

Anatomical Characteristics of Thoracic Vertebrae for Safe Pedicle Screw Placement：comparison Between Normal Adolescents and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

[Variation of the Position of the Conus Medullaris in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with a Cobb Angle Greater Than 40 Degrees: Analysis of MRI].

Determining the Association Between the Radiographic Parameters and the SRS-22 Scores in Chinese Female Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Does Curve Pattern Matter?

[Correlation Analysis Between the Sagittal and Coronal Parameters of Spino-Pelvic in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis].