Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

Regional Variation in Earnings Inequality in Reform-Era Urban China

Temporal and regional variation in earnings inequality: urban China in transition between 1988 and 1995

Gender Earnings Inequality in Reform-Era Urban China

Dynamics of the Gender Earnings Inequality in Reform-Era Urban China

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

The Evolution of China Labor Market and Government Behavior

Does the Market Pay Off? Earnings Inequality and Returns to Education in Urban China

Market expansion, state intervention and wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China: A multilevel analysis

Has China Crossed the River? the Evolution of Wage Structure in Urban China During Reform and Retrenchment

Education Development and Wage Inequality in Urban China

The Anatomy of Rising Earnings Inequality in Urban China

Danwei Profitability and Earnings Inequality in Urban China*

Within-Group Wage Inequality and Its Evolution in Urban China

Regional Evolutions of Wage in China During the Reform Era

Does the Market Pay Off? Earnings Returns to Education in Urban China

Marketization, Occupational Segregation, and Gender Earnings Inequality in Urban China

Urban wage inequality: the reform of state-owned enterprises in China’s great transition

Residual Wage Inequality in Urban China, 1995-2007

Income Inequality and Spatial Differences in China, 1988, 1995, and 2002

Ownership and Earnings Inequality in Urban China

Regional inequality ? the evoltion of rural-urban and inland-coastal inequality in china , 1983-1995