Short - Term Comparison and Operative Experience of Metal - on - Metal Versus Ceramic - on - Ceramic Bearing Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty

李永旺,孙俊英,骆园,杨茂伟,刘宏鸣
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3977/j.issn.1003-8478.2011.13.03
2011-01-01
Abstract:[Objective]To discuss the short-term results and operative experience of metal-on-metal(MOM)versus ceramic-on-ceramic(COC) bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty(THA). [Methods]Between April 2009 and January 2010,We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients(20 hips) performed with the MOM THA.At an average of 13 months period(range,11 to 20 months)postoperatively,all hips were available for follow-up.Their age was(51.7±3.8) years,and body mass index was(23.3±2.1) kg/m2.For comparison,We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients(20 hips) performed with the COC THA at the same time.All patients obtained an average follow-up of 15 months(range,11 to 20 months).Their age was(53.1±2.9) years,and body mass index was(23.8±2.6) kg/m2.The Harris hip Score was used for clinical evaluation.The roentgenographic results were observed.[Results]No infection,fracture,dislocation,deep venous thrombosis or neurovascular injury occurred in either group.Clinical results: there were no difference between the 2 groups about preoperative Harris score(P0.05),the differences between the 2 groups were significant at 6 weeks,3,6 and 12 months(P0.05).In the MOM group,1 patient had weak thigh pain was found,no moderate or severe pain.In the COC group,no one had thigh pain.In the MOM group,the total range of hip motion was 228.35°±9.72°.In the COC group,it was 191.15°±10.59°.Obvious superiority was observed in 2 groups(P0.05).Radiographic results: 39(97.5%) femoral stems were in neutral position and 1 was in mild valgus.No implant had subsidence in the MOM group.In the COC group,4 hips had less than 1.5mm subsidence,and there was no change in the latest follow up.In the MOM group,the acetabular component abduction angle was 40.05°±2.54,whereas the abduction angle for the COC group was 39.30°±2.70°(P=0.654).the anteversion angle of the MOM group was 15.60°±2.68°,whereas the average anteversion angle for the COC group was 15.25°±2.20°(P=0.131).There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the abduction angle and the anteversion angle(P0.05).[Conclusion]MOM THA may be better than COC THA,especially on the range of hip motion and early activity.Surgical skills was proved to be the most important factor contributing to the good results.However,the medium and long-term results still need further follow-up.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?