Evaluation of K-Ar and (40)air/(39) Ar Dating and Q Value

Quan WuXun,Ji JianQing,Zhou Jing,Li WeiRan,Tu JiYao
IF: 1.468
2013-01-01
Acta Petrologica Sinica
Abstract:Reasonable application of K-Ar and Ar-40/Ar-39 dating result should be based on a proper assessment of dating precision. To assess the reliability and accuracy of final results, researchers used to calculate statistic errors and error propagation. MSWD and Probability are proposed to involve systematic (external) and statistic (instrumental) errors at the same time, thus are widely applied for considering the relation of instrument and sample. This fact indicates that K-Ar and Ar-40/(39) Ar dating results could be affected by both instrument and sample. Based on the theory and process of K-Ar and Ar-40/Ar-39 dating, this paper assesses error propagation of each testing step and their effect to the final results numerically. Parameters Q(1) and Q(2), are proposed to represent related properties of samples that may affect the final results. Q(2) defines the relativity of K content, Ar-36 content and initial Ar-40/Ar-36 value of sample: Q(1) is crucial factor to affect the value of error propagation index. Q(1) defines the relativity of K content, Ar-36 content and error of initial Ar-40/Ar-36 of sample. Q(2) is proposed to assess the accuracy of isochron age and estimate whether samples started isochron clock in the exactly same geological time and on the same initial Ar-40/Ar-36 ratio without isotope diffusion and exchange after isotope system closure. According to parameter Q(1) and Q(2), we can tell whether errors of final results are caused mostly by instruments or by samples. Obviously, properties of instruments and samples should be assessed from different aspects before dating as suggested here. Well designed testing process is the key to getting high precision K-Ar and Ar-40/Ar-39 dating results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?