Abstract:Accessible Summary What is known on the subject? Psychiatric hospitals have input from a range of professionals, including Clinical Psychologists. Most evidence used to guide what Clinical Psychologists do is based on their work with individuals rather than staff teams. Some evidence shows working with staff teams is important, but most of this is based on interviews rather than measuring the impact using numbers and statistics. The current study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of staff‐level interventions provided by a Psychology team within a psychiatric inpatient setting. What the paper adds to existing knowledge? Training sessions were effective at increasing staff levels of confidence and understanding in psychological approaches, and the perceived usefulness of the session to their practice. Case discussion sessions were effective at increasing staff levels of understanding a service user, compassion towards the service user, perceived opportunities for change with the service user, their perceived skills to work with the service user and their perception of the usefulness of the session to their practice. Reflective practice sessions were effective at providing a space for learning, sharing ideas and reflecting. Other interventions were highly valued by nursing staff. What are the implications for practice? Staff‐level interventions are effective and valued by mental health nursing staff and should be considered in allocation of psychology resources. Interventions improved staff psychological thinking which could positively impact service user experience. There is potential for people with lived experience to participate in these interventions, which could facilitate the therapeutic relationship and reduce restrictive practices. Introduction The role of Psychologists in psychiatric inpatient settings is well established and involves intervention at various levels; however, quantitative exploration of the effectiveness of staff‐level interventions is lacking. Aim The aim of the study was to examine the effectiveness of a variety of staff‐level interventions provided by a Psychology team within a psychiatric inpatient setting. Methods The evaluation used a mixed methods approach incorporating pre–post quantitative data and post‐intervention feedback. Additional data were collected via survey. Key Findings Results indicated all staff‐level interventions were effective in achieving their aims and were highly valued by staff. Qualitative data supported the quantitative findings and showed tentative suggestion of a change to clinical practice. Discussion Indirect psychology provision was found to significantly impact a range of staff attitudes and was highly valued by the staff team, supporting previous qualitative findings in psychiatric inpatient settings. Further quantitative evidence of the impact of staff‐level interventions should be sought. Implications Staff‐level interventions are effective and valued by mental health nursing staff and should be considered in allocation of psychology resources. Furthermore, there is potential for people with lived experience to participate in these interventions, which could facilitate the therapeutic relationship and reduce restrictive practices, however this requires future research.

Current Practice of Psychological Assessment.

Turning the Page on Pen-and-Paper Questionnaires: Combining Ecological Momentary Assessment and Computer Adaptive Testing to Transform Psychological Assessment in the 21st Century

Psychological testing in the profession of psychology: an Australian study

A Survey of Psychological Assessment Feedback Practices

Interview about ethical issues from 11 psychological test users in hospital

Psychological provision in acute inpatient settings: An evaluation of indirect input

Standardized State Assessment

How much testing can a kid take? Feasibility of collecting pediatric patient experience ratings of neuropsychological and psychological assessment

Personality Assessment in the Diagnostic Manuals: On Mindfulness, Multiple Methods, and Test Score Discontinuities

The Clinician's Subjective Experience during the Interaction with Adolescent Psychiatric Patients: Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Clinician's Subjective Experience

Comparing the clinical utility of the alternative model for personality disorders to the Section II personality disorder model: A randomized controlled trial.

Assessing clinician's subjective experience during interaction with patients

Psychological assessment in school contexts: ethical issues and practical guidelines

Assessing Clinical Significance: Proposed Extensions to Method

Applying Bowen Theory to Psychiatric Assessment and Disposition in the ED

Technological innovations in clinical assessment and psychotherapy

Strategies used when conducting work-related assessments

Measuring Cognitive Impairments Associated With Schizophrenia in Clinical Practice: Overview of Current Challenges and Future Opportunities

Cognitive Screening Tests Versus Comprehensive Neuropsychological Test Batteries: A National Academy of Neuropsychology Education Paper†

Establishing best practice in pediatric emergency mental health: a prospective study examining clinical characteristics

Shortlisting from the Clearing House Application Form: Is it Fit for Purpose?