Abstract:Abstract Objective . To present an efficient uncertainty quantification method for range and set-up errors in Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations. Further, we show that uncertainty induced by interplay and other dynamic influences may be approximated using suitable error correlation models. Approach . We introduce an importance (re-)weighting method in MC history scoring to concurrently construct estimates for error scenarios, the expected dose and its variance from a single set of MC simulated particle histories. The approach relies on a multivariate Gaussian input and uncertainty model, which assigns probabilities to the initial phase space sample, enabling the use of different correlation models. Through modification of the phase space parameterization, accuracy can be traded between that of the uncertainty or the nominal dose estimate. Main results . The method was implemented using the MC code TOPAS and validated for proton intensity-modulated particle therapy (IMPT) with reference scenario estimates. We achieve accurate results for set-up uncertainties ( γ 2 mm/2% ≥ 99.01% ( E [ d ]), γ 2 mm/2% ≥ 98.04% ( σ ( d ))) and expectedly lower but still sufficient agreement for range uncertainties, which are approximated with uncertainty over the energy distribution. Here pass rates of 99.39% ( E [ d ])/ 93.70% ( σ ( d )) (range errors) and 99.86% ( E [ d ])/ 96.64% ( σ ( d )) (range and set-up errors) can be achieved. Initial evaluations on a water phantom, a prostate and a liver case from the public CORT dataset show that the CPU time decreases by more than an order of magnitude. Significance . The high precision and conformity of IMPT comes at the cost of susceptibility to treatment uncertainties in particle range and patient set-up. Yet, dose uncertainty quantification and mitigation, which is usually based on sampled error scenarios, becomes challenging when computing the dose with computationally expensive but accurate MC simulations. As the results indicate, the proposed method could reduce computational effort while also facilitating the use of high-dimensional uncertainty models.

A fast computational method for moment-independent uncertainty importance measure.

A stable approach based on asymptotic space integration for moment-independent uncertainty importance measure.

A new moment-independent uncertainty importance measure based on cumulative residual entropy for developing uncertainty reduction strategies

A kernel estimate method for characteristic function-based uncertainty importance measure

Computational strategy for uncertainty importance measure ranking based on norm

Unified Reliability Measure Method Considering Uncertainties of Input Variables and Their Distribution Parameters

A method of measuring the difference between probability models as uncertainty and its applications in financial economics

Quantify uncertainty by estimating the probability density function of the output of interest using MLMC based Bayes method

Statistical analysis and method to propagate the impact of measurement uncertainty on dynamic mode decomposition

Efficient Input Uncertainty Quantification for Ratio Estimator

Efficient uncertainty quantification for Monte Carlo dose calculations using importance (re-)weighting

Multicanonical sequential Monte Carlo sampler for uncertainty quantification

Evaluation of sampling methods for nuclear data uncertainty quantification

Computing moment inequality models using constrained optimization

Adaptive importance sampling via minimization of estimators of cross-entropy, mean square, and inefficiency constant

An importance sampling method for Feldman-Cousins confidence intervals

A self-adaptive method for the assessment of dynamic measurement uncertainty

Importance sampling method for Feldman-Cousins confidence intervals

ON THE ERROR RATE OF IMPORTANCE SAMPLING WITH RANDOMIZED QUASI-MONTE CARLO*

Combination of measurement uncertainty contributions via the generalized Dombi operator

The Polynomial Stein Discrepancy for Assessing Moment Convergence