Abstract:Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are the primary source of strong space weather disturbances at Earth. Their geoeffectiveness is largely determined by their dynamic pressure and internal magnetic fields, for which reliable predictions at Earth are not possible with traditional cone CME models. We study two Earth-directed CMEs using the EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA) model, testing the predictive capabilities of a linear force-free spheromak CME model initialised using parameters derived from remote-sensing observations. Using observation-based CME input parameters, we perform MHD simulations of the events with the cone and spheromak CME models. Results show that spheromak CMEs propagate faster than cone CMEs when initialised with the same kinematic parameters. We interpret these differences as due to different Lorentz forces acting within cone and spheromak CMEs, leading to different CME expansions. Such discrepancies can be mitigated by initialising spheromak CMEs with a reduced speed corresponding to the radial speed only. Results at Earth evidence that the spheromak model improves the predictions of B(Bz) up to 12-60(22-40) percentage points compared to a cone model. Considering virtual spacecraft located around Earth, B(Bz) predictions reach 45-70%(58-78%) of the observed peak values. The spheromak model predicts inaccurate magnetic field parameters at Earth for CMEs propagating away from the Sun-Earth line, while it successfully predicts the CME properties and arrival time in the case of strictly Earth-directed events. Modelling CMEs propagating away from the Sun-Earth line requires extra care due to limitations related to the assumed spherical shape. The spatial variability of modelling results and the typical uncertainties in the reconstructed CME direction advocate the need to consider predictions at Earth and at virtual spacecraft around it.

The Inversion of the Real Kinematic Properties of Coronal Mass Ejections by Forward Modeling

Kinetic Properties of Cmes Corrected for the Projection Effect

Full Halo Coronal Mass Ejections: Do We Need to Correct the Projection Effect in Terms of Velocity?

The projection effect is one of the biggest obstacles in learning the real properties of coronal mass ejections ( CMEs ) and forecasting their geoeffectiveness . To evaluate the projection effect

Assessing the projection correction of Coronal Mass Ejection speeds on Time-of-Arrival prediction performance using the Effective Acceleration Model

Numerical Research on the Effect of the Initial Parameters of a CME Flux-rope Model on Simulation Results. II. Different Locations of Observers

Correcting Projection Effects in CMEs Using GCS‐Based Large Statistics of Multi‐Viewpoint Observations

Modeling Interplanetary Expansion and Deformation of CMEs with ANTEATR-PARADE I: Relative Contribution of Different Forces

Modeling the Thermodynamic Evolution of Coronal Mass Ejections Using Their Kinematics

Kinematic Differences between Gradual and Impulsive Coronal Mass Ejections: The Role of Flares

Non-conventional Approach for Deriving the Radial Sizes of Coronal Mass Ejections at Different Instances: Discrepancies in the Estimates Between Remote and In Situ Observations

Numerical Simulations on the Deflection of Coronal Mass Ejections in the Interplanetary Space

First Determination of 2D Speed Distribution Within the Bodies of Coronal Mass Ejections with Cross-correlation Analysis

An Ice‐cream Cone Model for Coronal Mass Ejections

Statistical Study of Coronal Mass Ejection Source Locations: Understanding CMEs Viewed in Coronagraphs

Investigation of the Forces that Govern the Three-Dimensional Propagation and Expansion of Coronal Mass Ejections from Sun to Earth

Quantitative Analysis of CME Deflections in the Corona

Unraveling the Thermodynamic Enigma between Fast and Slow Coronal Mass Ejections

On The Influence Of The Solar Wind On The Propagation Of Earth-impacting Coronal Mass Ejections

Observation-based modelling of magnetised Coronal Mass Ejections with EUHFORIA