Abstract:Classical economists developed the labour theory of value to isolate economic rent, which they defined as the excess of market price and income over the socially necessary cost of production (value ultimately reducible to the cost of labour). A free market was one free of such ‘unearned’ income – a market in which prices reflected actual necessary costs of production or, in the case of public services and basic infrastructure, would be subsidized in order to make economies more competitive. Most reformers accordingly urged – and expected – land, monopolies and banking privileges to be nationalized, or at least to have their free-lunch income taxed away. In keeping with his materialist view of history, Marx expected banking to be subordinated to the needs of industrial capitalism. Equity investment – followed by public ownership of the means of production under socialism – seemed likely to replace the interest-extracting ‘usury capital’ inherited from antiquity and feudal times: debts mounting up at compound interest in excess of the means to pay, culminating in crises marked by bank runs and property foreclosures. But as matters have turned out, the rentier interests mounted a counter-Enlightenment to undermine the reforms that promised to liberate society from special privilege. Instead of promoting capital investment in an alliance with industry and government, financial planners have sponsored a travesty of free markets. Realizing that income not taxed is free to be capitalized, bought and sold on credit, and paid out as interest, bankers have formed an alliance between finance, insurance and real estate (FIRE) to free land rent and monopoly rent (as well as debt-leveraged ‘capital’ gains) from taxation. The result is that today's economy is burdened with property and financial claims that Marx and other critics deemed ‘fictitious’ – a proliferation of financial overhead in the form of interest and dividends, fees and commissions, exorbitant management salaries, bonuses and stock options, and ‘capital’ gains (mainly debt-leveraged land-price gains). And to cap matters, new financial modes of exploiting labour have been innovated, headed by pension-fund capitalism and privatization of Social Security. As economic planning has passed from government to the financial sector, the alternative to public price regulation and progressive taxation is debt peonage.

Capital Logic and Financial Crisis

The Vitality of Marxism in the Current Financial Crisis

The Logic of Capital and Ecological Crisis

Explanation of the Financial Crisis through Marxist Scientific Theory

Economic Crisis and Financial Crisis in Marxian Economics——On Economic Crisis and Financial Crisis of Contemporary Capitalism

A Critique upon the Theory of Economic Crisis in Contemporary Bourgeois Economics

The Nature of the Economic Crisis and Its' Corresponding Countermeasures

Capital is about The Grand Theory of Market Power Structure:Also about the Basic Theory of Socialist Market Economy

Marx's Legacy, Régulation Theory and Contemporary Capitalism

Reproduction and Crisis in Capitalist Economies

From Marx to Goldman Sachs: The Fictions of Fictitious Capital, and the Financialization of Industry

The Limits of Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis as an Explanation of the Crisis

The Mystery of Capital

On the Expansion of Marxist Theory of Economic Crisis in Time and Space and Its Extended Meaning

Marxism Shedding Light on the Causes of the Current Financial Crisis

Capital Logic and Moral Cost

Several Thoughts about the Theory on the Organic Structure of Capital

Finance-Dominated Accumulation and the Limits to Institutional and Spatio-Temporal Fixes in Capitalism

Marxist Crisis Theory and the Profit Rate in the U.S.Economy,1975—2008

On Basic Connotation of the Logic of Capital

THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND THE SYSTEMIC FAILURE OF THE ECONOMICS PROFESSION