Future Trend of Family Households and Elderly Living Arrangement in China
Yi Zeng,Zhenglian Wang,Leiwen Jiang,Danan Gu
2008-01-01
Genus
Abstract:A number of studies based on 1982, 1990 and 2000 census micro data reveal that the household composition in China has been changing substantially in the past a couple of decades (Zeng and Wang, 2003; Guo, 2003). Those changes are reflected, for example, in the substantial increase of one-person and one-couple-only households, and decrease in average household size. More specifically, the proportion of the elderly not living with children and the proportion of one-couple-only households among the elderly population increased considerably. Changes in household composition have been and will continue to reduce the elderly care capacities of Chinese families, which will increasingly affect social services and economic development. Clearly, family support for the elderly is facing grave challenges in the process of rapid population aging and substantive changes in household structures. Applying the new ProFamy method (Zeng, Vaupel, and Wang, 1997; 1998; Zeng and Land et al., 2006; 2008), its associated computer software, and the recent census and survey data mainly collected around the 2000 census, this study projects the future changes in family household size and structure, elderly living arrangements, and population aging in the period of 2000-2050 under the scenarios of medium assumptions on fertility, mortality, rural-urban migration, marriage, and divorce for rural and urban areas in China. As compared to the other previous demographic projection studies concerning the future population in China, this study has two unique features. First, we simultaneously project the trends of population age and sex distributions and project family households and elderly living arrangements. This is useful since dynamic changes in family households, elderly living arrangements, and population age/sex structures occur simultaneously. Second, we conduct the projection of the population classified by rural and urban sectors and take into account the large rural-urban differentials in