Abstract:Objective: To approach the evaluative effect of respiratory variation of superior vena cava peak flow velocity measured using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on fluid responsiveness in patients with mechanical ventilation. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted. All mechanical ventilated critically ill patients whose fluid therapy was planned due to hypovolemia in Department of Critical Care Medicine of Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University from April 2011 to April 2013 were enrolled. Volume expansion was performed with 500 mL Linger solution within 30 minutes. Patients were classified as responders if pulse pressure variation (PPV) increased ≥ 13% before volume expansion. The respiratory variation in superior vena cava peak velocity was calculated as the difference between maximum and minimum values of velocity in peak A, peak S and peak D over a single respiratory circle, and their variations (ΔA, ΔS, ΔD) were also calculated. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted to assess the evaluative effect of respiratory variation of superior vena cava peak velocity on fluid responsiveness. Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in this study. Volume expansion increased PPV ≥ 13% happened in 14 patients (responders). The velocity of superior vena cava in peak A, peak S, peak D was significantly increased after volume expansion compared with that before volume expansion in responders [peak A (cm/s): 34.6 ± 2.2 vs. 31.3 ± 2.1, t=-2.493, P=0.027; peak S (cm/s): 39.1 ± 1.3 vs. 35.3 ± 2.1, t=-2.564, P=0.024; peak D (cm/s): 28.1 ± 1.2 vs. 23.3 ± 1.4, t=-4.995, P=0.000], but there was no significant difference in ΔA, ΔS and ΔD between before and after volume expansion. The ΔA, ΔS and ΔD were positively correlated with PPV (r=0.040, P=0.854; r=0.350, P=0.074; r=0.749, P=0.000). The area under ROC curve (AUC) of peak S was 0.36 [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.11-0.52], but the AUC of ΔS was 0.68 (95%CI 0.47-0.89), the AUC of peak D was 0.41 (95%CI 0.19-0.63), but the AUC of ΔD was 0.95 (95%CI 0.86-1.00), so the aberration rate of superior vena cava in respiration was better than the flow rate in superior vena cava. When the cut-off value of ΔS was 20.7% for predicting fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity was 78.6% and the specificity was 61.5%. When the cut-off value of ΔD was 12.7% for predicting fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity was 92.0% and the specificity was 92.3%. Conclusions: Respiratory variations in superior vena cava peak velocity measured by TTE could assess fluid responsiveness in patients with mechanical ventilation.

Effects of Simulated Hypovolemia on Tricuspid Inflow and Superior Vena Cava Velocities in Healthy Young Men

Comparison of tricuspid inflow and superior vena caval Doppler velocities in acute simulated hypovolemia: new non-invasive indices for evaluating right ventricular preload

The Predictive Ability Of Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time And Respirophasic Variation In Blood Flow Peak Velocity Measured By Ultrasonography For Fluid Responsiveness In Parturients For Cesarean Delivery

Evaluation of Global Cardiac Systolic Performance and Diastolic Filling in Central Hypovolumia by Lower Body Negative Pressure with Doppler Echocardiography

[The assessment of ultrasonic measurement of superior vena cava blood flow for the volume responsiveness of patients with mechanical ventilation]

Doppler Pulmonary Venous Flow in Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Children with Congenital Heart Disease

Comparison of superior and inferior vena cava diameter variation measured with transthoracic echocardiography to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients after abdominal surgery

Ultrasonographic Measurement of the Respiratory Variation in the Inferior Vena Cava Diameter is Predictive of Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Evaluation of Fluid Responsiveness with Dynamic Superior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Transesophageal Echocardiographic Measurements of the Superior Vena Cava for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

Change in Left Ventricular Velocity Time Integral During Trendelenburg Maneuver Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Cardiac Surgical Patients in the Operating Room

The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study

Validity of stroke volume variation for predicting fluid responsiveness in different grades of intra-abdominal pressure

The Validity of Carotid Doppler Peak Velocity and Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index in Identifying the Fluid Responders in Mechanically Ventilated Septic Shock Patients

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with hemodynamic stability: a prospective repeated-measures study

Correlation between Carotid and Brachial Artery Velocity Time Integral and Their Comparison to Pulse Pressure Variation and Stroke Volume Variation for Assessing Fluid Responsiveness

Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Reductions Precede Changes in Traditional Vital Signs During Simulated Blood Loss

Association between tricuspid annular systolic velocity and poor short-term prognosis in patients with acute decompensated heart failure

The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study

Comparative evaluation of atrial systolic function by tissue Doppler imaging and blood flow Doppier echocardiography in healthy individuals

Abstract 2896: Quantitative Left Ventricular Flow Vortex Analysis is Superior to Conventional Echo-Doppler to Predict Hemodynamics and Symptoms in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure: A Novel Quantitative Vorticity Imaging Study Using Contrast Echocardiography and Particle Image Velocitimetry