Abstract:In this paper we examine capital income taxation of a reference dependent sufficiently loss averse investor in a two period portfolio choice model under full loss offset provisions. Capital income taxation with loss offset provisions has been found to stimulate risk taking in expected utility models under certain assumptions about attitudes towards risk but would such effect be found under prospect theory type of preferences? We observe that the impact of capital income taxation depends on investors’ reference levels relative to their endowment income and thus we explore capital income taxation for different types of loss averse investors in terms of their ambition. We consider the less ambitious investors to be the ones with relatively low reference levels (they avoid relative losses in both periods) and more ambitious investors to be those with relatively high reference levels. We analyze two types of more ambitious investors: investors with higher time preference (who experience relative losses only in the second period under the bad state of nature) and investors with lower time preference (who experience relative losses only in the first period). We observe that capital income taxation stimulates current consumption in most cases which encourages risk taking, although the final outcome would depend on the investors’ degree of risk aversion, the rate of time preference and the tax rate in relation to certain thresholds. Current consumption could be discouraged for some ambitious type of investors that have relatively high second period reference levels but not necessary first period reference levels. in summary, to determine the impact of capital income taxation on the decision variables the reference levels in relation to endowment income play the most significant role. Ignoring reference depended preferences can lead to different conclusions for investors reaction to capital income taxation. We also find certain type of investors whose happiness level increases with capital income taxation under full loss offset provisions.

CAPITAL GAINS AND SOCIAL INCOME

WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF ‘SOCIAL INCOME’ IN A CHANGING ECONOMY

Capital Income Taxation under Full loss offset Provisions of a Prospect Theory Investor

OPTIMAL INVESTMENT AND CONSUMPTION IN THE MARKET WITH JUMP RISK AND CAPITAL GAINS TAX

Capital in the twenty-first century in China

Capital risk, fiscal policy, and the distribution of wealth

THE SPIRIT OF CAPITALISM, NON-EXPECTED UTILITY AND ASSET PRICING

Capital in the Twenty-First Century in China: Do Piketty's Laws Work in the Chinese Case?

The Economics of Intangible Capital

An equilibrium-conserving taxation scheme for income from capital

Investor experiences and international capital flows

Which Capital, Which Marx? Basic Income between Mainstream Economics, Critical Theory, and the Logic of Capital

The choice of the personal income tax base

Regret Theory And Asset Pricing Anomalies In Incomplete Markets With Dynamic Un-Aggregated Preferences

Optimal Income Taxation

The Long-run Effects of Structural Change and the Treatment of International Capital Accumulation, Mobility and Ownership

The Income Fluctuation Problem with Capital Income Risk: Optimality and Stability

Toward a Quantitative General Equilibrium Asset Pricing Model with Intangible Capital

On the survival of a flawed theory of capital: mainstream economics and the Cambridge capital controversies

Supply-side Optimal Capital Taxation with Endogenous Wage Inequality