Abstract:In their classic accounts, anthropological ethnographers developed causal arguments for how specific sociocultural structures and processes shaped human thought, behavior, and experience in particular settings. Despite this history, many contemporary ethnographers avoid establishing in their work direct causal relationships between key variables in the way that, for example, quantitative research relying on experimental or longitudinal data might. As a result, ethnographers in anthropology and other fields have not advanced understandings of how to derive causal explanations from their data, which contrasts with a vibrant "causal revolution" unfolding in the broader social and behavioral sciences. Given this gap in understanding, we aim in the current article to clarify the potential ethnography has for illuminating causal processes related to the cultural influence on human knowledge and practice. We do so by drawing on our ongoing mixed methods ethnographic study of games, play, and avatar identities. In our ethnographic illustrations, we clarify points often left unsaid in both classic anthropological ethnographies and in more contemporary interdisciplinary theorizing on qualitative research methodologies. More specifically, we argue that for ethnographic studies to illuminate causal processes, it is helpful, first, to state the implicit strengths and logic of ethnography and, second, to connect ethnographic practice more fully to now well-developed interdisciplinary approaches to causal inference. In relation to the first point, we highlight the abductive inferential logic of ethnography. Regarding the second point, we connect the ethnographic logic of abduction to what Judea Pearl has called the ladder of causality, where moving from association to intervention to what he calls counterfactual reasoning produces stronger evidence for causal processes. Further, we show how graphical modeling approaches to causal explanation can help ethnographers clarify their thinking. Overall, we offer an alternative vision of ethnography, which contrasts, but nevertheless remains consistent with, currently more dominant interpretive approaches.

Causal Analysis in Social Research

Causation and Causal Analysis in Social Sciences

On the Criteria, Identification and Test of Causality: Some Methodological Considerations

Methodological Foundations of Modern Causal Inference in Social Science Research

Causality, Causal Discovery, and Causal Inference in Structural Engineering

Statistical Approaches for Causal Inference

An Introduction to Causal Discovery

Causal inference in ethnographic research: Refining explanations with abductive logic, strength of evidence assessments, and graphical models

Causal Inference and Related Statistical Methods

Why Do We Need Causal Inference in Scientometric Research?

Causal Analysis Framework for Recommendation

Methods and tools for causal discovery and causal inference

A Survey on Causal Inference

Causal Inference in the Social Sciences

[Observation and Experiment: a Causal Perspective].

Causal inference: critical developments, past and future

Causal Inference in Spatial Statistics

Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them

Navigating causal reasoning in sustainability science

Practical Approaches to Causal Relationship Exploration

Causal inference on human behaviour