Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

Clark and His Decentralization Discourse

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

The Options Between Centralization and Decentralization in the Process of Decision-Making in Farmland Conversion

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

On the General Issues about Decentralization Reforms of Higher Education

A Study of Burton R.Clark's Academic Power Distribution Model with an Analysis of the Composite Features of the Chinese Model

Energy-Level-Function Analysis in Higher Education System:A Case Study of China's Higher Education

Decentralization , Deregulation and Economic Transition in China

Political Decentralization and Policy Experimentation

2 policies in different regions , and they do so all the time ( Brennan and Buchanan 1980 , Breton 1996

China’s Development Modeli:the Costs and Benefits of the Decentralization Approach to Transition

When Does Centralization Undermine Adaptation?

Centralization or decentralization? the impact of different distributions of authority on China's environmental regulation

Symmetry between Authority and Responsibility:The Bottom Line of Decentralization in Higher Education

Central-local Relations and Higher Education Stratification in China

Twentieth-Century American Education Reform in the Global Context

The M-form Hierarchy and China's Economic Reform

Decentralized or Centralized;Evidence from Chinese Enterprises

Redefining Decentralization: Devolution of Administrative Authority to County Governments in Zhejiang Province

Keeping Up with the Jones': Decentralization, Policy Imitation, and Industrial Development in China