Abstract:BACKGROUND:The curative effect of liver transplantation for patients with end-stage liver disease was encouraging in recent years and the 5-year patient survival rate can reach up to 70%. However, some patients might lose grafts due to a variety of reasons, including bile duct complications, vascular complications, primary non-function, graft rejection and disease recurrence etc. Liver retransplantation (re-LT) was the only available means for those patients whose initial grafts had failed, but the inferior outcomes of re-LT compared to primary liver transplantation (PLT) continue to be a major concern. This study aimed to analyze the indications for re-LT, optimal timing of re-LT, and strategies to improve the survival rate after re-LT.METHODS:From January 2001 to December 2006, we performed 738 liver transplants and 39 re-LT (5.3%) at our center. A retrospective analysis was performed to identify factors (indication for re-LT, preoperative score of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), interval to re-LT from primary liver transplantation, methods of vascular and biliary reconstruction and common causes of death) associated with survival.RESULTS:Mean follow-up period was 1.8 years (1 to 5 years). Patients with MELD score less than 20 were better than those whose MELD score was > 20 and MELD score > 30 (1-year survival, 80.0% versus 50.0% and 3/5). The perioperative survival rate of patients who received re-LT at an interval of more than 30 days and less than 8 days after the initial transplantation was higher than those who received retransplantation between 8 to 30 days following the first operation (88.5% and 74.3% versus 50.0%). The main causes of death were infection (60.0%), multiple organ failure (20.0%), vascular complications (10.0%) and biliary fistula (10.0%) in perioperative period. The overall patient survival rate of 1-month, 6-month and 1-year was 80.0%, 76.7% and 66.7%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS:Our study suggested the favorable results after re-LT. The analysis also showed optimal timing of operation, refined surgical techniques, individualized immunosuppressive regimen and effective prophylaxis and treatment of perioperative infection play an important role in achieving a higher survival after re-LT.

Clinic analysis Of Liver Retransplantation

A Clinicopathological Analysis of Liver Retransplantation in 22 Cases

Perioperative Outcomes Comparing Laparoscopic with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Post-Hepatectomy Recurrent Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liver Retransplantation: a Single-Centre Experience.

Preliminary Clinical Experience in Liver Retransplantation

Clinical Analysis of Liver Retransplantation in 10 Cases

[Liver Retransplantation: Report of 80 Cases].

[Clinical Study of Liver Re-Transplantation].

Clinical Experience of Liver Retransplantation in 8 Patients

Liver Retransplantation: Report of 80 Cases and Review of Literature.

[Analysis of Survival Rate and Risk Factors of Liver Retransplantation].

Experience in Liver Retransplantation in 28 Cases

Early Liver Retransplantation Versus Late Liver Retransplantation： Analysis of a Single-Center Experience

Liver Retransplantation:Report of 5 Cases and Review of Literature

Clinical Experience of Liver Retransplantation in 14 Patients

Clinical analysis between “early” versus “late” liver retransplantation

Treatment and Character of the Patients Who Received Liver Retransplantation During Perioperation

A clinical report of 6 cases of liver retransplantation

Retransplantation for liver transplanter with poor graft function:a report of 22 cases

Clinical analysis between "early" versus "late" liver retransplantation]

Analysis of risk factors of early mortality after liver re-transplantation