Abstract:A measure of correlation or strength of association between random variables is the correlation coefficient. In scientific research, correlation analysis is most often carried out using various correlation coefficients without explaining why this particular coefficient was chosen and what the resulting value of this coefficient means. The article discusses Spearman correlation coefficient, Kendall correlation coefficient, phi (Yule) correlation coefficient, Cramér’s correlation coefficient, Matthews correlation coefficient, Fechner correlation coefficient, Tschuprow correlation coefficient, rank-biserial correlation coefficient, point-biserial correlation coefficient, as well as association coefficient and contingency coefficient. The criteria for applying each of the coefficients are given. It is shown how to establish the significance (insignificance) of the resulting correlation coefficient. The scales in which the correlated variables should be located for the coefficients under consideration are presented. Spearman rank correlation coefficient and other nonparametric indicators are independent of the distribution law, and that is why they are very useful. They make it possible to measure the contingency between such attributes that cannot be directly measured, but can be expressed by points or other conventional units that allow ranking the sample. The benefit of rank correlation coefficient also lies in the fact that it allows to quickly assess the relationship between attributes regardless of the distribution law. Examples are given and step-by-step application of each coefficient is described. When analyzing scientific research and evaluating the results obtained, the strength of association is most commonly assessed by the correlation coefficient. In this regard, a number of scales are given (Chaddock scale, Cohen scale, Rosenthal scale, Hinkle scale, Evans scale) grading the strength of association for correlation coefficient, both widely recognized and not so well known.

Comparing Correlated but Nonoverlapping Correlations.

Comparing the Pearson and Spearman Correlation Coefficients Across Distributions and Sample Sizes: A Tutorial Using Simulations and Empirical Data

On Correlation Coefficients

Quotient correlation: A sample based alternative to Pearson's correlation

Power Comparisons in 2x2 Contingency Tables: Odds Ratio versus Pearson Correlation versus Canonical Correlation

Comparison of correlation-based measures of concordance in terms of asymptotic variance

Are alternative variables in a set differently associated with a target variable? Statistical tests and practical advice for dealing with dependent correlations

Adjust Pearson's r to Measure Nonlinear Monotone Dependence

An asymptotically optimal transform of Pearson's correlation statistic

Correlating and predicting psychiatric symptom ratings: Spearman's r versus Kendall's tau correlation

Nonparametric statistics. Part 3. Correlation coefficients

Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data

Should Pearson's correlation coefficient be avoided?

Comparing methods for assessing a difference in correlations with dependent groups, measurement error, nonnormality, and incomplete data.

The Evolution of Pearson's Correlation Coefficient

A Unified Approach to Construct Correlation Coefficient Between Random Variables

A Short Note on Spearman Correlation: Impact of Tied Observations

Intrinsic tests for the equality of two correlated proportions

Alternatives to Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients

The extension of Pearson correlation coefficient, measuring noise, and selecting features

On Correlation and Prediction Interval Reduction