Morphologic and electrophysiological study of peripheral nerve regeneration contributed to different nerve graftings

Guo-xing WEI,Shao-zong CHEN,Yue-jun LI,Xue-yong LI,Jin-qing LI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2006.06.003

2006-01-01

Abstract: Objective To study the effect of the neuromechanism of the nerve graft on the regeneration of peripheral nerve defect. Methods 12 New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into three groups. A 1.2 cm segment of the auricularis magnuses on both sides was resected to establish an artificial defect. In group A, the defect was repaired by the coaptation of both ends of the auricularis magnuses. In group B, the defect was coaptated by saphenous nerve grafting. In group C, the defect was coaptated by lateral femoral cutaneous nerve grafting. The nerve electrophysiological test was preformed to detect the nerve action potential and the conduction velocity, and the neuromechanism was observed by methylthionine chloride staining 12 weeks after the procedure. All of the images were analysed by the Image Pro Plus computer program. Results 12 weeks after the procedure, the amplitude of nerve action potential and its recovery rate in group A were bigger than those in group C while those in group B were the biggest. The nerve conduction velocity in group B was bigger than that in group C. The mean density and area of the myelinated fibers in the distal nerve in group A were bigger than those in group C while those in group B were the biggest. The mean thickness of the myelin in the distal nerve in group B was bigger than that in group A and C (P< 0.05). Conclusion The neuromechanism of the graft nerve could affect the autograft nerve regeneration, and the nerve graft with larger area of its nerve bundle, higher density of its axon but smaller area of its cross section could regenerate better.