Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical effects of primary revision after artificial hip replacement and causes of revision surgery. Methods A total of 344 patients who underwent revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and artificial femoral head replacement from January 2010 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 141 males and 203 fe?males, with a mean age 65.64±10.81 years (28-87 years). A total of 351 hip revisions were performed in 344 patients with 7 pa?tients in bilateral revisions. All patients were followed up for 60.38±22.75 months (24-105 months). All patients with periprosthet?ic infection underwent two?stage revision after prosthesis placement, and all others underwent one?stage revision. The clinical out?comes of revision surgery were assessed with the Harris hip score and the survival rate of the revision prosthesis. According to the duration from artificial hip replacement to revision surgery, all patients were divided into early revision (less than 5 years) and late revision (more than 5 years) groups. They were also divided into two groups according to the age of the patient in revision sur?gery:＞55?year?old and≤55?year?old groups. The causes of revision, hip reoperation and re?revision were recorded. Results In the 351 hip revisions, a total of 238 (67.8%) had aseptic loosening, 41 (11.7%) periprosthetic fractures, 30 (8.5%) periprosthetic infection, 23 (6.6%) recurrent dislocation and 19 (5.4%) the eccentric liner wear. The infection rate was significantly higher in the early revision group (21.1%) than that in the late revision group (4.2%) (χ2=24.443, P＜0.001). The aseptic loosening rate was sig?nificantly higher in the late revision group (72.4%) than that in the early revision group (54.4%) (χ2=9.899, P=0.002). Sixteen pa?tients underwent hip surgery after revision, including 6 recurrent dislocations, 4 aseptic loosening, 3 periprosthetic fractures, and 3 periprosthetic infections. Eight of them underwent revision surgery, including 4 cases of aseptic loosening, 2 cases of periprosthet? ic fractures, and 2 cases of recurrent dislocation. The duration from the primary revision to the second revision was 22.1 ± 10.0 months (1-75 months). The 5?year and 8?year survival rates of the revision prostheses were 99.3%[95% CI(98.3%, 100.3%)] and 92.6% [95% CI(87.1%, 98.1%)], respectively. The proportions of prosthetic infection and eccentric liner wear in the≤55?year?old group were significantly higher than those in the＞55?year?old group (χ2=3.981, P=0.046; χ2=5.226, P=0.022), while the propor?tion of aseptic loosening in the＞55?year?old group was significantly higher than that in the ≤55?year?old group (χ2=5.254, P=0.022). The 8?year survival rates of the revision prostheses of ≤55?year?old group and＞55?year?old group were 76.8% [95% CI (50.5% , 103.1% )] and 95.4% [95% CI (91.1% , 99.7% )], respectively. Conclusion Young patients have a higher risk of re?revi?sion after revision THA.

The Reviewing Analysis of Joint Arthroplasty Results

Related factors and intervention analysis of periprosthetic infections in patients with total hip arthroplasty

Long-Term Effectiveness of Total Hip Replacement with the Collum Femoris Preserving Prosthesis

Total hip replacement as a revision procedure in 27 cases following artificial femoral head arthroplasty

Evaluation of Causes and Clinical Effects of Revision Surgery after Artificial Hip Replacement

Health technology assessments and health policies on hip replacement in China: Whether or not research informs policy-making

Management of the infected total hip or knee arthroplasty with two-staged revisions

[Mid-Term Follow-Up Study of Hip Arthroplasty for Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly].

Progress on the investigation of BMP application in revision total hip arthroplasty

[Analysis on Morphology and Stability of Femoral Hip Prosthesis Based on the Revision Operation].

Revision Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Post Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty of 34 Hospitals in China Between 2015 and 2017: a Multi-Center Survey

Efficacy Analysis on Hip Replacement for Hip-Joint Diseases with Parkinson Disease

Preventing Hospital Readmissions and Limiting the Complications Associated With Total Joint Arthroplasty

Certain issues in clinical application of arthroplasty

Risk factors and preventions of total hip replacement and total knee replacement

Analysis of failure mechanisms of total hip arthroplasty

Analysis of the special clinical features of 1202 cases of total knee arthroplasty

Application and trend of robot-assisted hip and knee arthroplasty

Effect analysis of hip arthroplasty after senile hip internal fracture fixation failure

Treating Experience of Hip Arthroplasty for Senile Obsolete Femoral Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

Selection and Comparison of Different Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Over 85 Years Old