Abstract:Statement of problem: The loss in the retentive capability of implant-supported overdenture attachments has been related to the wear of the retentive inserts. Wear of the abutment coating material when following the replacement period for the retentive inserts requires investigation. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the changes in retentive force of 3 polyamide and a polyetheretherketone denture attachments under repeated insertion and removal cycles in wet conditions while following their manufacturers' replacement time recommendations. Material and methods: Four different denture attachments (LOCKiT, OT-Equator, Ball attachment, and Novaloc) with their retentive inserts were tested. Four implants were embedded into individual acrylic resin blocks, and 10 abutments for each attachment were used. Forty metal housings with their retentive inserts were attached to polyamide screws with autopolymerizing acrylic resin. A customized universal testing machine was used to simulate insertion and removal cycles. The specimens were mounted on a second universal testing machine at 0, 540, 2700, and 5400 cycles, and the maximum retentive force was recorded. The retentive inserts for LOCKiT (light retention), OT-Equator (soft retention), and Ball attachment (soft retention) were replaced every 540 cycles, while the Novaloc (medium retention) attachments were never replaced. All the abutments were weighed with a precision scale at 0, 2700, and 5400 cycles. The surface of every abutment was examined under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the mean retentive force and mean abutment mass of all groups and time evaluation points. Bonferroni corrections were made to adjust for multiple tests (α=.05). Results: The mean retention loss for LOCKiT was 12.6% after 6 months and 45.0% after 5 years of simulated use. The mean retention loss for OT-Equator was 16.0% after 6 months and 50.1% after 5 years of simulated use. The mean retention loss for Ball attachment was 15.3% after 6 months and 39.1% after 5 years of simulated use. The mean retention loss for Novaloc was 31.0% after 6 months and 59.1% after 5 years of simulated use. The mean abutment mass difference was statistically significant (P<.05) for LOCKiT and Ball attachment but not statistically significant (P>.05) for OT-Equator and Novaloc at baseline, 2.5 years, and 5 years. Conclusions: All tested attachments recorded retention loss under the experimental conditions, even when their manufacturers' recommendations for replacement time for the retentive inserts were followed. Patients should be aware that implant abutments should be replaced after a recommended period since their surfaces also change over time.

Study on Abutment Displacement of Overdentures with Attachments

Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible.

[Influence of attachment type on stress distribution of implant-supported removable partial dentures].

Influence of Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behaviour of Mandibular Implant-Retained/supported Overdentures: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Retention Evaluation of Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdenture Using Two Different Attachment Systems: An in Vitro Study

Evaluation of Marginal Bone Height Changes in implant-supported mandibular overdenture retained with Two Different Materials of Bar Attachments.

Effect of mastication load on retention force of custom-made LOCATOR abutments manufactured for angled implants: An in vitro study

Abutment-Bar Structure Connection Geometry: An Important Design Parameter for Implant-Supported Bar-Retained Overdentures With Cantilever Extension

Influence of Different Abutment Designs on the Biomechanical Behavior of Dental Root-Analog Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Retentive force variations in three polyamide and a polyetheretherketone denture attachments for implant-supported overdentures: An in vitro study

Biomechanical Characteristics of Maxillary Molar Distalization Using Different Attachments with Clear Aligners: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Influence of Connector Design on Displacement and Micromotion in Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures Using Different Lengths and Diameters: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study

In vitro experiment of retention strength attenuation of three attachments

Effect of two esthetic digitally produced materials used in fabrication of extracoronal attachments on the stresses Induced in removable partial dentures

[Effect of different root control attachments on the mesially movement of upper molar with plastic aligner].

CRESTAL BONE LOSS USING DIFFERENT STUD ATTACHMENTS IN DISTAL EXTENSION CASES

Effect of Angled Abutments in the Posterior Maxillary Region on Tilted Implants: a 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Accuracy of Selective Laser Melted Bar retaining mandibular implant-assisted Overdenture: An In vitro Comparison of Different Impression Materials and Techniques

Clinical Effect and Observation on Effects of Magfit Ex Magnetic Attachments

Influence of Cross-Section Design and Vertical Misfit on Stress Distribution in Overdenture Retaining System: 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Influence of clinic design of the prostheses with ERA attachment for distal extension defect: A three-dimensional finite dement analysis