Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of ownership structure arising from China’s unique privatization process on listed firms’ tunneling activities and their interaction with tax avoidance. Design/methodology/approach Using hand-collected data on the incompletely restructured state-owned listed firms and their applicable tax rate, this paper conducts a multivariate regression to test research questions. It also employs a triple differences method to examine whether the observed interaction between tax avoidance and tunneling is mitigated for well-governed firms. Findings It documents that controlling shareholders’ tunneling increases as the percentage of shares owned by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) increases. Evidence also shows that the magnitude of tunneling increases when SOEs controlled by the central government engage in more tax avoidance, suggesting that these firms use tax avoidance to facilitate wealth expropriation. Social implications These findings advance the understanding of the tunneling incentive behind the tax avoidance behavior for a subset of Chinese SOEs and have implications for emerging capital markets that are characterized by concentrated government ownership and weak corporate governance. Originality/value This paper is the first paper to investigate the effect of the incomplete privatization process on tunneling and the interaction between tunneling and tax avoidance activities. It extends prior studies by investigating the incentives behind SOEs’ tax avoidance from the perspective of an agency problem and documenting that good corporate governance plays an important role in deterring the diversionary tax avoidance.

What Motivates and Constrains Politicians to Privatize? the Case of China

The Transformative Effects of Privatization in China: A Natural Experiment Based on Politician Career Concern

Political Capital Vs. Constraint: Evidence from CEO Turnovers in Chinese Private Firms

Why Does Government Need Privatization?

Decentralized Privatization and Change of Control Rights in China

What Causes Privatization? Evidence from Import Competition in China

Causes of Privatization in China

Political Determinants of Privatizations in China: A Natural Experiment Based on Politician Career Concerns

Paying for the Dream of Public Ownership: Case Studies on Corruption and Privatization in China

How Does Government Ownership Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from China’s Privatization Experience

Political Patronage and Privatization:Evidence from China's Collectively-Owned Enterprises

Price for the Dreamed Public Ownership:A Case Study of Corruption in China' s Privatization

Personal Position, Firm Growth, Social Responsibility and Institutional Risk:An Empirical Study on Motivation of Political Participation among China’s Private Entrepreneurs

Privatization, tunneling, and tax avoidance in Chinese SOEs

Privatizing Rural China: Insider Privatization, Innovative Contracts and the Performance of Township Enterprises

Decentralization, Strategic Policy Burdens and the SOE Reforms in China – Theory and Evidence

What Causes Privatization? Evidence from Import Competition

Governing nonprofits under competing institutional logics: The implementation of board governance in China

Divergent Interests between Central and Local Governments: Testing Theories of Public Ownership

How Does Privatization Work in China?