Evolutions of China’s Inter-regional R&D Collaboration Patterns: Based on the Three-dimensional Analysis of Organization, Geography and Technology
Feng-Chao Liu,Fei-Fei Yan,Na Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/msmi-19.2019.24
2019-01-01
Abstract:Inter-regional collaboration plays an important role in booting the flow of knowledge and technology between cross-border actors. The existing research focus on collaboration pattern itself and its spatial characteristics, but ignored its technological characteristics. This paper proposes a three-dimensional analytical framework, and applies the framework to the Chinese case by examining collaborative invention patent applications from 1985 to 2015. Results show that, first, the evolutions of China’s inter-regional R&D collaboration patterns differ greatly; second, geographic constraint on China’s inter-regional knowledge flows mainly exists in early period, especially for two patterns (inter-regional collaboration between enterprises, and between enterprises and academic institutions); third, China’s inter-regional R&D collaboration mainly took place in related technological fields in early period, but in unrelated technological fields for two patterns (inter-regional collaboration between academic institutions, and between enterprises and academic institutions) in the last two periods. Chemistry and Metallurgy, Physics, Electricity are main collaborative fields. Introduction Due to globalization and regionalization processes, cross-border collaboration has become a new appeal. As a channel of open innovation, inter-regional R&D collaboration boots the flow of knowledge and technology between cross-border actors. Specifically, China, after a series of reforms of the S&T system, especially after the proposal of innovation-driven development strategy in year 2006, has experienced a rapid growth in inter-regional R&D collaboration, and regards inter-regional collaboration as an important policy issues, in order to strategically narrow the regional difference in innovation. So, more and more scholars begin to pay attention to the dynamic features or patterns of inter-regional collaboration. One important strand of literature deals with the geographical dimension of inter-regional R&D collaboration. Relevant research mainly investigated the spatial characteristics of inter-regional R&D collaboration which changed over time, by using the social network analysis [1-3]. Other strand of literature highlights the organizational dimension of inter-regional R&D collaboration. Studies discovered the organizational backgrounds of innovative actors in inter-regional R&D collaboration, and stated that due to different reward systems in different organizations, diverse and conflictive motivations shape inter-regional R&D collaboration [4-6]. Also, a few researchers discuss a combination of the above two dimensions. Relevant research mainly focus on the distinct spatial features of inter-regional R&D collaboration with different types of organizations [7-9]. The existing literature has paid more attention to the quantity but ignored the structure of inter-regional collaboration, however, for the studies which focused on the structure they emphasized on the collaboration pattern itself and its spatial characteristics more than technological characteristics which should be viewed as an important consideration. In other words, scholars has recognized the “region and organization” boundaries which exist in inter-regional R&D collaboration, but ignored the technological boundary of inter-regional R&D collaboration. Systematic and empirical studies have seldom been carried out regarding the patterns of inter-regional R&D collaboration across regional, organizational and technological boundaries. In this paper, we 6th International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation (MSMI 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 84