Imaging Dispersion Curves of Surface Waves on Multi‐channel Record
Choon Byong Park,Richard D. Miller,Jianghai Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1820161
1998-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1998Imaging dispersion curves of surface waves on multi‐channel recordAuthors: Choon Byong ParkRichard D. MillerJianghai XiaChoon Byong ParkKansas Geological Survey, Richard D. MillerKansas Geological Survey, and Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Surveyhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.1820161 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1820161FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byA frequency-velocity CNN for developing near-surface 2D vs images from linear-array, active-source wavefield measurementsComputers and Geotechnics, Vol. 156Near-surface Site Characterization Based on Joint Iterative Analysis of First-arrival and Surface-wave Data4 November 2022 | Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 44, No. 2Effectiveness of stacking in filtering noise from surface wave data4 March 2023 | International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 118Vs30-based site classification and assessment of site-specific ground response analysis for densely populated urban areas of Trabzon (NE Turkey)17 August 2022 | Acta Geophysica, Vol. 71, No. 1Review on the Applications of Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) in Indian Subcontinent15 July 2022Guidelines for Minimization of Uncertainties and Estimation of a Reliable Shear Wave Velocity Profile Using MASW Testing: A State-of-the-Art Review23 August 2022Enhancing noise sources in stationary-phase zones for accurate phase-velocity estimation of high-frequency surface wavesYa Liu, Jianghai Xia, Chaoqiang Xi, Hao Zhang, Bo Guan, Tianyu Dai, and Ling Ning5 December 2022 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 88, No. 1Two-stage broad learning inversion framework for shear-wave velocity estimationXiao-Hui Yang, Peng Han, Zhentao Yang, and Xiaofei Chen23 December 2022 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 88, No. 1Research Status and Development of Rayleigh Surface Wave Exploration TechnologyHans Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 01The Implementation of Shallow Geophysical Survey for Detection of Some Buried Archaeological Structures in Aswan City, Egypt11 February 2023Surface wave imaging using deep reflection seismic data: a study on the Cuonadong dome9 August 2022 | Earth, Planets and Space, Vol. 74, No. 1Viscoelasticity assessment of tumoral skin with the use of a novel contact-free palpation methodology based upon surface waves4 November 2022 | Scientific Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1Tools for the efficient analysis of surface waves from active and passive seismic data: exploring an NE-Italy perilagoon area with significant lateral variations19 September 2022 | Earth, Planets and Space, Vol. 74, No. 1Distributed acoustic sensing for active offshore shear wave profiling11 June 2022 | Scientific Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1Optimal stacking of noise cross-correlation functions18 October 2022 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 232, No. 3Analytical computation of the dominant dispersion trend of Lamb waves in plate‐like structures with an improved dynamic stiffness matrix method23 September 2022 | Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 29, No. 11Magmatic and Tectonic Domains of Central Costa Rica and the Irazú‐Turrialba Volcanic Complex Revealed by Ambient Noise Tomography24 November 2022 | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 127, No. 11High-Frequency Surface-Wave Imaging from Traffic-Induced Noise by Selecting In-line Sources30 August 2022 | Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 10Surface wave dispersion inversion using an energy likelihood function23 August 2022 | Geophysical Journal InternationalBenefits of selective stacking of windowed high-resolution linear radon transform (HRLRT) images from traffic-induced passive-seismic data with the multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) method in Lawrence, KansasJulian Ivanov, Richard D. Miller, Dmitry Borisov, Shelby Peterie, and Anthony M. Hoch15 August 2022Full phase-velocity spectrum inversion of multimode Rayleigh wavesYanlong Niu, Yunyue Elita Li, and Siau Chen Chian15 August 2022S-transform based processing of noisy surface wave record for recovering high-resolution spectrumSayan Mukherjee, Mrinal Bhaumik, and Tarun Naskar15 August 2022Extrapolated surface-wave dispersion inversionHongyu Sun and Laurent Demanet15 August 2022Single-path ground motion amplifications during the 2020 Haenam, South Korea, swarm29 March 2022 | Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 10SWprocess: a workflow for developing robust estimates of surface wave dispersion uncertainty19 April 2022 | Journal of Seismology, Vol. 26, No. 4Subsurface profiling of a region in Jamshedpur city using active MASW: a case study16 June 2022 | Acta Geophysica, Vol. 70, No. 4Improvement of Frequency–Bessel Phase-Velocity Spectra of Multicomponent Cross-Correlation Functions from Seismic Ambient Noise24 June 2022 | Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaSeismo-Stratigraphic Model for the Urban Area of Milan (Italy) by Ambient-Vibration Monitoring and Implications for Seismic Site Effects Assessment14 June 2022 | Frontiers in Earth Science, Vol. 10Subsurface Profiling Using Roadside MASW Survey: Influence of Multiple Sources and Offline DistanceDipjyoti Baglari, Arindam Dey, and Jumrik Taipodia1 September 2022 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 27, No. 2Field and Synthetic Waveform Tests on Using Large‐Offset Seismic Streamer Data to Derive Shallow Seabed Shear‐Wave Velocity and Geotechnical Properties23 June 2022 | Earth and Space Science, Vol. 9, No. 6Domain Adaptation in Automatic Picking of Phase Velocity Dispersions Based on Deep Learning22 June 2022 | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 127, No. 6Watching the Cryosphere Thaw: Seismic Monitoring of Permafrost Degradation Using Distributed Acoustic Sensing During a Controlled Heating Experiment24 May 2022 | Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 49, No. 10Changes in soil conditions before and after earthquakes at a repetitive soil liquefaction site in TaiwanYu-Tai Wu25 February 2022 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 87, No. 3MATLAB codes for generating dispersion images for ground exploration using different multichannel analysis of surface wave transformsTarun Naskar and Jyant Kumar10 March 2022 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 87, No. 3The extended range phase shift method for broadband surface wave dispersion measurement from ambient noise and its application in ore deposit characterizationBao Deng, Junlun Li, Jiangshan Liu, Changming Shen, Junliu Suwen, and Qi-Fu Chen26 April 2022 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 87, No. 3In-situ physical properties of reclaimed lands in SingaporeYanlong Niu, Yunyue Elita Li, Siau Chen Chian, Enhedelihai Nilot, and Gang Fang2 May 2022 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 41, No. 5A new DAS sensor prototype for multicomponent seismic dataJunichi Takekawa, Hitoshi Mikada, Shibo Xu, Masahiro Uno, Shiori Kamei, Kinzo Kishida, Daiji Azuma, Masafumi Aoyanagi, Naoto Tanaka, and Hiroki Ichikawa2 May 2022 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 41, No. 5First application of a new seismo‐electric streamer for combined resistivity and seismic measurements along linearly extended earth structures19 February 2022 | Near Surface Geophysics, Vol. 20, No. 2MASW-Based Shear Wave Velocities for Predicting Liquefaction-Induced Sand Boils Caused by the 2017 M5.4 Pohang, South Korea EarthquakeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 148, No. 4Rayleigh-Wave Dispersion Curves from Energetic Hurricanes in the Southeastern United States25 January 2022 | Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 112, No. 2Stiffness and Thickness Measurement of HMA Pavement with Flying Microphone Arrays17 March 2022Site Amplification Factors and Acceleration Response Spectra for Shallow Bedrock Sites – Application to Southern India18 May 2020 | Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 4Near-surface imaging from traffic-induced surface waves with dense linear arrays: An application in the urban area of Hangzhou, ChinaBinbin Mi, Jianghai Xia, Gang Tian, Zhanjie Shi, Huaixue Xing, Xiaojun Chang, Chaoqiang Xi, Ya Liu, Ling Ning, Tianyu Dai, Jingyin Pang, Xinhua Chen, Changjiang Zhou, and Hongyu Zhang15 February 2022 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 87, No. 2Far-offset detection of normal modes and diving waves: A case study from the Valhall Field, southern North SeaFilipe Borges and Martin Landrø27 January 2022 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 87, No. 2Joint inversion of Rayleigh wave fundamental and higher order mode phase velocity dispersion curves using multi‐objective grey wolf optimization21 January 2022 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 70, No. 3Rayleigh wave equations with couple stress: Modeling and dispersion characteristicYanqi Wu and Jianwei Ma11 November 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 87, No. 1Forward modeling of Rayleigh surface waves for analytical characterization of dominant dispersion trends25 October 2021 | Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 51, No. 1On the Retrievability of Seismic Waves From High-Speed-Train-Induced Vibrations Using Seismic InterferometryIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 19Near-Surface Characterization Using High-Speed Train Seismic Data Recorded by a Distributed Acoustic Sensing ArrayIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 60Combined Exploration of Active and Passive Surface Waves in River Crossing ChannelAdvances in Geosciences, Vol. 12, No. 03Brief communication: Seismological analysis of flood dynamics and hydrologically triggered earthquake swarms associated with Storm Alex6 May 2022 | Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 5Study of an Automatic Picking Method for Multimode Dispersion Curves of Surface Waves Based on an Improved U-NetIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 60Full Waveform Tomography to Address Challenges with Surface Wave Dispersion Information Caused by Significant Stochastic Variability of Subsurface StiffnessJoseph T. Coe and Siavash Mahvelati3 February 2022 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 26, No. 4Utilizing distributed acoustic sensing and ocean bottom fiber optic cables for submarine structural characterization10 March 2021 | Scientific Reports, Vol. 11, No. 1Numerical simulation of laser-generated Rayleigh wave pulses propagation in the machined surface with residual stress using finite-difference methodOptik, Vol. 248Earthflow reactivation assessment by multichannel analysis of surface waves and electrical resistivity tomography: A case study10 November 2021 | Open Geosciences, Vol. 13, No. 1Passive multichannel analysis of surface waves using 1D and 2D receiver arraysSarah L. Morton, Julian Ivanov, Shelby L. Peterie, Richard D. Miller, and Amanda J. Livers-Douglas23 September 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 86, No. 6Convolutional Neural Network, Res‐Unet++, ‐Based Dispersion Curve Picking From Noise Cross‐Correlations11 November 2021 | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 126, No. 11UAV-Enabled Subsurface Characterization Using Multichannel Analysis of Surface WavesJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 147, No. 11Investigation on the Failure Mechanism of Rainfall-Induced Long-Runout Landslide at Upputhode, Kerala State of India9 November 2021 | Land, Vol. 10, No. 11Synchrosqueezed wavelet transform-based method for characterizing the dispersive nature of laser-excited surface acoustic waves propagating through the coated or damaged mediumMeasurement, Vol. 185Laboratory Measurements of the Impact of Fracture and Fluid Properties on the Propagation of Krauklis Waves28 September 2021 | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 126, No. 10Convolutional neural network for guided-wave energy identification in microseismic DAS dataYoufang Liu, Owen Huff, and Ge Jin1 September 2021Filtering guided waves for characterizing subsea permafrostJefferson Bustamante Restrepo, Gabriel Fabien-Ouellet, Mathieu J. Duchesne, and Amr Ibrahim1 September 2021Detecting and delineating voids and mines using new surface-wave methods in Galena, KansasJulian Ivanov, Shelby L. Peterie, Richard D. Miller, Dmitry Borisov, Steve Sloan, Erik Knippel, and Anthony Hoch1 September 2021Performance of Different Transformation Techniques for MASW Data Processing Considering Various Site Conditions, Near-Field Effects, and Modal Separation23 September 2021 | Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 42, No. 5Retrieving 2-D laterally varying structures from multistation surface wave dispersion curves using multiscale window analysis20 July 2021 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 227, No. 2Advances in surface-wave tomography for near-surface applicationsMyrto Papadopoulou, Farbod Khosro Anjom, Mohammad Karim Karimpour, and Valentina Laura Socco2 August 2021 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 40, No. 8Shear-wave velocity measurements and their uncertainties at six industrial sites3 March 2021 | Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 37, No. 3Edenville Dam Site20 July 2021Seismic inversion of shale reservoir properties using microseismic-induced guided waves recorded by distributed acoustic sensingBin Luo, Ariel Lellouch, Ge Jin, Biondo Biondi, and James Simmons1 June 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 86, No. 4Multimodal surface-wave tomography to obtain S- and P-wave velocities applied to the recordings of unmanned aerial vehicle deployed sensorsFarbod Khosro Anjom, Thomas Jules Browaeys, and Laura Valentina Socco10 June 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 86, No. 4Physics-Based Relationship for Pore Pressure and Vertical Stress Monitoring Using Seismic Velocity Variations7 July 2021 | Remote Sensing, Vol. 13, No. 14Influence of receiver layout on active MASW survey conducted at different sites having varying substrata characteristics9 June 2021 | Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 14, No. 12A Study to Establish Regression Correlation Between Shear Wave Velocity and "N"-Value for Varanasi City, India3 June 2020 | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences, Vol. 91, No. 2Extraction of Multimodal Dispersion Curves From Ambient Noise With Compressed Sensing3 June 2021 | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 126, No. 6A Comprehensive Assessment of a Dynamic Compaction Operation Using Pre- and Post-Compaction Shear Wave Velocity Measurements and Attenuation Studies6 May 2021Shallow tunnel detection using converted surface wavesShelby L. Peterie, Julian Ivanov, Erik Knippel, Richard D. Miller, and Steven D. Sloan10 May 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 86, No. 3Inversion of vehicle-induced signals based on seismic interferometry and recurrent neural networksLu Liu, Yujin Liu, Tao Li, Yi He, Yue Du, and Yi Luo8 April 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 86, No. 3Apollo Seismic Data Interpretation Using an Elastodynamic Space-Time Spectral Element Technique and Dispersion Image Inversion Method15 April 2021Seismic Site Effect Investigation for Future Moonquake-Resistant Structures by Considering Geometrical and Geotechnical Characteristics of Lunar Bases15 April 2021Phase-weighted slant stacking for surface wave dispersion measurement15 March 2021 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 226, No. 1Profiles of Near‐Surface Rock Mass Strength Across Gradients in Burial, Erosion, and Time4 April 2021 | Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, Vol. 126, No. 43D S-wave velocity modelling with surface waves in oil seismic prospecting15 June 2020 | Exploration Geophysics, Vol. 52, No. 2Deep Learning for Extracting Dispersion Curves6 September 2020 | Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 42, No. 1The High-Speed Inversion of Rayleigh Wave and its Microtremor Application AnalysisIEEE Access, Vol. 9Passive seismic recording of cryoseisms in Adventdalen, Svalbard20 January 2021 | The Cryosphere, Vol. 15, No. 1Velocity structure and radial anisotropy of the lithosphere in southern Madagascar from surface wave dispersion17 November 2020 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 224, No. 3Anomalous azimuthal variations with 360° periodicity of Rayleigh phase velocities observed in Scandinavia13 November 2020 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 224, No. 3Delineation of Potential Groundwater Zones Using Shear Wave Velocity in Eastern Deccan Volcanic Province, India19 October 2020 | Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 177, No. 12Revisiting Lunar Seismic Experiment Data Using the Multichannel Simulation with One Receiver (MSOR) Approach and Random Field Modeling14 October 2020 | Earth, Moon, and Planets, Vol. 124, No. 3-4The magnifying effect of a thin shallow stiff layer on Love waves as revealed by multi-component analysis of surface waves3 June 2020 | Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, No. 1Seismic imaging of S-wave structures of shallow sediments in the East China Sea using OBN multicomponent Scholte-wave dataYuan Wang, Zhiwei Li, Jianhua Geng, Qingyu You, Tianyao Hao, Yaoxing Hu, Chunlei Zhao, Yan Zhang, and Yuzhu Liu21 October 2020 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 85, No. 6Retrieval of shallow S-wave profiles from seismic reflection surveying and traffic-induced noiseKai Zhang, Hongyi Li, Xiaojiang Wang, and Kai Wang6 November 2020 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 85, No. 6Validating the origin of microseismic events in target reservoir using guided waves recorded by DASOwen Huff, Ariel Lellouch, Bin Luo, Ge Jin, and Biondo Biondi2 November 2020 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 39, No. 11Killi zeminlerde MASW ile elde edilen kesme dalgası hızı ile plastisite indisi ve standart penetrasyon sayısı korelasyonu29 October 2020 | European Journal of Science and TechnologyNear-surface investigation by the vibration of drilling shothole in mountain seismic explorationWen Peng, Degang Jin, Le Li, Xiaobin Zhang, Zhonglin Cao, and Dajun Li30 September 2020Analysis of guided waves excited by microseismic events in DAS dataOwen Huff, Ariel Lellouch, Ge Jin, and Bin Luo25 September 2020Estimation of seismic velocity and layer thickness of Eagle Ford Formation using microseismic guided waves in downhole distributed acoustic sensing recordsBin Luo, Ge Jin, and Ariel Lellouch30 September 2020Model-based ground-roll attenuation with updating quality factorsJianyong Bai and Orhan Yilmaz30 September 2020Imaging dispersion of MASW data with the rammer sourceZhi Yang, Yu Li, Chongwang Yue, and Jianbo Guan30 September 2020RNN-based dispersion inversion using train-induced signalsLu Liu, Yujin Liu, and Yi Luo30 September 2020Comparisons between non-interferometric and interferometric passive surface wave imaging methods — Towards linear receiver arrayFeng Cheng, Jianghai Xia, Zongbo Xu, and Jonathan Ajo-Franklin30 September 2020A unique approach for estimating surface-wave instability and nonuniquenessJulian Ivanov, Richard D. Miller, Anthony M. Hoch, Shelby L. Peterie, Sarah Morton, and Dmitry Borisov30 September 2020New approach in the application of seismic methods for assessing surface excavatability of sedimentary rocks22 April 2020 | Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol. 79, No. 7Rayleigh-wave multicomponent crosscorrelation-based source strength distribution inversions. Part 2: a workflow for field seismic data11 June 2020 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 222, No. 3Horizontally orthogonal distributed acoustic sensing array for earthquake- and ambient-noise-based multichannel analysis of surface waves16 June 2020 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 222, No. 3The Frequency‐Bessel Spectrograms of Multicomponent Cross‐Correlation Functions From Seismic Ambient Noise7 August 2020 | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 125, No. 8Automated operational modal analysis and ambient noise deconvolution interferometry for the full structural identification of historic towers: A case study of the Sciri Tower in Perugia, ItalyEngineering Structures, Vol. 215Field Investigation on the Effects of Base Plate Material on Experimental Surface Wave Data with MASWSiavash Mahvelati, Joseph Thomas Coe, and Philip Asabere29 July 2020 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 25, No. 2Measuring vertical soil water content profiles by combining horizontal borehole and dispersive surface ground penetrating radar data7 April 2020 | Near Surface Geophysics, Vol. 18, No. 3Geophysical approach to study the potential ocean wave-induced liquefaction: an example at Magoodhoo Island (Faafu Atoll, Maldives, Indian Ocean)23 March 2020 | Marine Geophysical Research, Vol. 41, No. 2Region-Specific Correlations Between $$\varvec{V}_{{{\mathbf{S}}30}}$$ and Time-Averaged $$V_{\text{S}}$$ and SPT-N Values at Different Depths for the Indo-Gangetic Basin25 July 2019 | Indian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 50, No. 3Guided ultrasonic wavefield cross-correlation with a curved array for high-resolution plate inspection27 February 2020 | Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 3Time-lapse monitoring of stress-field variations within the Lower Permian shales in KansasSarah L. Morton, Richard D. Miller, Julian Ivanov, Shelby L. Peterie, and Robert L. Parsons1 May 2020 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 39, No. 5In Situ Seismic Investigations for Evaluating Geotechnical Properties and Liquefaction Potential of Fine Coal TailingsJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 146, No. 5Separation of multi‐mode surface waves by supervised machine learning methods9 January 2020 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 68, No. 4Estimating Near-Surface Shear-Wave-Velocity Structures Via Multichannel Analysis of Rayleigh and Love Waves: An Experiment at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site3 January 2020 | Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 41, No. 2Environmental hazard analysis of a gypsum karst depression area with geophysical methods: a case study in Sivas (Turkey)28 February 2020 | Environmental Earth Sciences, Vol. 79, No. 5Numerical Application of Full Waveform Inversion to Identify a Single Weak Layer in a Slope21 February 2020MASW Survey to Map Soil Layers and Rock Profiles in a Construction Site19 September 2020Surface‐wave analysis for static corrections in mineral exploration: A case study from central Sweden27 November 2019 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 68, No. 1Application of surface‐wave tomography to mineral exploration: a case study from Siilinjärvi, Finland30 December 2019 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 68, No. 1On the Green's function emergence from interferometry of seismic wave fields generated in high-melt glaciers: implications for passive imaging and monitoring2 April 2020 | The Cryosphere, Vol. 14, No. 3Data-driven dispersive surface-wave prediction and mode separation using high-resolution dispersion estimationJournal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 171Parametric Study on the Interpretation of Wave Velocity Obtained by Seismic Interferometry in Beam‐Like Buildings10 September 2019 | Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 109, No. 53D wave-equation dispersion inversion of Rayleigh wavesZhaolun Liu, Jing Li, Sherif M. Hanafy, and Gerard Schuster8 August 2019 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 84, No. 5Multiscale and layer-stripping wave-equation dispersion inversion of Rayleigh waves10 May 2019 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 218, No. 3Simultaneous attenuation of multimode ground roll in three-component seismic dataJianyong Bai and Orhan Yilmaz10 August 2019Reconstruction of seismic signals by the S-transform ridgesAleksander S. Serdyukov, Aleksander V. Yablokov, Anton V. Azarov, and Tatiana V. Shilova1 August 2019Low-frequency ambient Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS): Useful for subsurface investigation?Jeffrey Shragge, Jihyun Yang, Nader A Issa, Michael Roelens, Michael Dentith, and Sascha Schediwy10 August 2019Surface wave analysis sensitivity to a-priori information assumptionsJulian Ivanov, Richard D. Miller, Anthony M. Hoch, Shelby L. Peterie, and Sarah Morton10 August 2019Effects of near-surface spatial variability of soil stiffness on surface wave dispersionSiavash Mahvelati, Joseph Thomas Coe, and Alireza Kordjazi10 August 2019Selective-window processing for optimized surface wave imaging of passive dataSarah L. Morton, Julian Ivanov, and Richard D. Miller10 August 2019Quality parameters for passive image interferometry tested at the Groningen network16 May 2019 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 218, No. 2Effect of Source Characteristics on the Resolution of Dispersion Image from Active MASW Survey2 November 2018 | Indian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3Optimizing surface wave method for geotechnical site investigationChih-Ping Lin and Chun-Hung Lin 29 April 2019Frequency‐Bessel Transform Method for Effective Imaging of Higher‐Mode Rayleigh Dispersion Curves From Ambient Seismic Noise Data5 April 2019 | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 124, No. 4High-Resolution Characterization of Near-Surface Structures by Surface-Wave Inversions: From Dispersion Curve to Full Waveform19 January 2019 | Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 40, No. 2On the application of the fk-MUSIC method to measurement of multimode surface wave phase velocity dispersion from receiver arrays23 November 2018 | Journal of Seismology, Vol. 23, No. 2Sensitivity analysis of dispersion curves of Rayleigh waves with fundamental and higher modes13 November 2018 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 216, No. 2Sparsity-promoting method to estimate the dispersion curve of surface-wave group velocityReza Dokht Dolatabadi Esfahani, Roohollah Askari, and Ali Gholami27 November 2018 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 84, No. 1Slant f-k transform of multichannel seismic surface wave dataAleksander S. Serdyukov, Aleksander V. Yablokov, Anton A. Duchkov, Anton A. Azarov, and Valery D. Baranov13 December 2018 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 84, No. 1Acquisition and Analysis of Surface Wave Data in the Indo Gangetic Basin8 November 2018Application of MASW in the South Iceland Seismic Zone1 July 2018Research Status and Progress of Surface Wave Exploration TechnologyAdvances in Geosciences, Vol. 09, No. 09Passive processing of active nodal seismic data: estimation of VP∕VS ratios to characterize structure and hydrology of an alpine valley infill15 August 2019 | Solid Earth, Vol. 10, No. 4Calibrating a new attenuation curve for the Dead Sea region using surface wave dispersion surveys in sites damaged by the 1927 Jericho earthquake7 March 2019 | Solid Earth, Vol. 10, No. 2Recommendations for generating dispersion images of optimal resolution from active MASW survey4 January 2018 | Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, Vol. 3, No. 1A state-of-the-art review of passive MASW survey for subsurface profiling19 September 2018 | Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, Vol. 3, No. 1Two robust imaging methodologies for challenging environments: Wave-equation dispersion inversion of surface waves and guided waves and supervirtual interferometry + tomography for far-offset refractionsJing Li, Kai Lu, Sherif Hanafy, and Gerard Schuster25 October 2018 | Interpretation, Vol. 6, No. 4Imaging and monitoring of the shallow subsurface using spatially windowed surface-wave analysis with a single permanent seismic sourceTatsunori Ikeda, Takeshi Tsuji, Masashi Nakatsukasa, Hideaki Ban, Ayato Kato, Kyle Worth, Don White, and Brian Roberts11 October 2018 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 83, No. 6In situ modulus reduction characteristics of stabilized pavement foundations by multichannel analysis of surface waves and falling weight deflectometer testsConstruction and Building Materials, Vol. 188CHARACTERIZING THE STIFFNESS OF A SHALLOW BEDROCK SITE USING THE MULTICHANNEL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES (MASW) METHOD WITH RAYLEIGH AND LOVE WAVESSiavash Mahvelati and Joseph Thomas Coe26 October 2018EFFECTS OF REDUCTIONS IN NUMBER OF CHANNELS ON RAYLEIGH AND LOVE WAVE DISPERSION IMAGES ACQUIRED USING THE MULTICHANNEL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES (MASW) METHODSiavash Mahvelati and Joseph Thomas Coe26 October 2018Combination of dispersion curves from MASW measurementsSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 113Measured vs. predicted site response at the Garner Valley Downhole Array considering shear wave velocity uncertainty from borehole and surface wave methodsSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 113Shear Wave Velocities in the Estimation of Earthquake Hazard Over Alluvium in Seismically Active Region12 September 2018 | Journal of the Geological Society of India, Vol. 92, No. 3Seismic hazard classifications and VS30 in Connecticut using MASW and HVSR methodsSarah L. C. Morton, John W. Lane, Margaret A. Thomas, and Lanbo Liu27 August 2018Identification of near-surface fractures via seismic-radial anisotropyJer-Yu Jeng, Roohollah Askari, Snehamoy Chatterjee, and Reza Dolatabadi27 August 2018Calculation of active-source Rayleigh-wave phase velocity by Aki's spectral formulaXinxin Li and Hongping Fang27 August 2018Time-lapse monitoring of subsidence features within the Hutchinson Salt in KansasSarah L. Morton, Julian Ivanov, Shelby L. Peterie, Richard D. Miller, Robert L. Parsons, and Amanda J. Livers-Douglas27 August 2018Effects of the angle of impact on surface-wave generationSiavash Mahvelati, Joseph Thomas Coe, and Alireza Kordjazi27 August 2018Strong variation in weathering of layered rock maintains hillslope‐scale strength under high precipitation2 March 2018 | Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol. 43, No. 6Dispersive Radon transformThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 143, No. 5Estimation of Rayleigh wave modal attenuation from near-field seismic data using sparse signal reconstructionsSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 107Lamb Wave Phase Velocity Imaging of Concrete Plates with 2D Arrays13 December 2017 | Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 37, No. 1Tool for analysis of multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) field data and evaluation of shear wave velocity profiles of soilsCanadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 55, No. 2Three-parameter Radon transform based on shifted hyperbolasAli Gholami and Toktam Zand4 December 2017 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 83, No. 1Seismic Site Cha
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Offset and Resolution of Dispersion Curve in Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)
Choon Byong Park,Richard D. Miller,Jianghai Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922953
2001-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2001Offset and Resolution of Dispersion Curve in Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)Authors: Choon Byong ParkRichard D. MillerJianghai XiaChoon Byong ParkKansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas, Richard D. MillerKansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas, and Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansashttps://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922953 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Introductory paragraph for this paper is available only in the PDF and GZipped PS filesPermalink: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922953FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byReview on the Applications of Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) in Indian Subcontinent15 July 2022Study of Shallow Soil Deposit in East Coast of India by SPT, MASW, and Crosshole Tests1 January 2023Liquefaction hazard assessment in a seismically active region of Himalayas using geotechnical and geophysical investigations: a case study of the Jammu Region4 August 2022 | Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol. 81, No. 9Subsurface profiling of a region in Jamshedpur city using active MASW: a case study16 June 2022 | Acta Geophysica, Vol. 70, No. 4Subsurface Profiling Using Roadside MASW Survey: Influence of Multiple Sources and Offline DistanceDipjyoti Baglari, Arindam Dey, and Jumrik Taipodia1 September 2022 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 27, No. 2Characterizing the Effects of Survey Parameters on Experimental Love Wave Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) Data22 June 2021 | Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 178, No. 8Influence of receiver layout on active MASW survey conducted at different sites having varying substrata characteristics9 June 2021 | Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 14, No. 12Killi zeminlerde MASW ile elde edilen kesme dalgası hızı ile plastisite indisi ve standart penetrasyon sayısı korelasyonu29 October 2020 | European Journal of Science and TechnologyField Investigation on the Effects of Base Plate Material on Experimental Surface Wave Data with MASWSiavash Mahvelati, Joseph Thomas Coe, and Philip Asabere29 July 2020 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 25, No. 2Influence of Source Energy and Stacking on Active MASW Method Dispersion ImageIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 498, No. 1Selective-window processing for optimized surface wave imaging of passive dataSarah L. Morton, Julian Ivanov, and Richard D. Miller10 August 2019Effect of Source Characteristics on the Resolution of Dispersion Image from Active MASW Survey2 November 2018 | Indian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3METHOD OF AUTOMATED EXTRACTING OF DISPERSION CURVES BASED ON TIME-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF SEISMIC DATAv20 February 2019 | Russian Journal of geophysical technologies, No. 3Multi-channel analysis of surface wave method for geotechnical site characterization in Yogyakarta, Indonesia15 January 2019 | E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 76Recommendations for generating dispersion images of optimal resolution from active MASW survey4 January 2018 | Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, Vol. 3, No. 1Combination of dispersion curves from MASW measurementsSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 113Impact of Strike Energy on the Resolution of Dispersion Image in Active MASW Survey4 May 2018Comparison of different seismic sources for near-surface velocity characterization in La Marque, TexasKeyao Xia and Fred Hilterman17 August 2017Mining and Geothermal and Near Surface Complete Session17 August 2017Integration of Thermal Digital 3D Model and a MASW (Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave) as a Means of Improving Monitoring of Spoil Tip StabilityPredictive equations for soil shear-wave velocities of Hungarian soils based on MASW and CPT measurements around Győr12 November 2015 | Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, Vol. 51, No. 4MASW analysis of bedrock velocities (Vs and Vp)Choon Park1 September 2016Special Session Complete Session1 September 2016Preliminary study of microzonation in South Tangerang City using analysis of Vs-30RESISTIVITY AND SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY AS A PREDICTIVE TOOL OF SEDIMENT TYPE IN COASTAL LEVEE FOUNDATION SOILSDerek Goff, Juan Lorenzo, and Koichi Hayashi26 March 2015SELF-ADAPTIVE METHOD FOR HIGH-FREQUENCY DISPERSION CURVE DETERMINATION12 May 2014Lateral heterogeneity and surface-wave inversion (MASW)Soumya Roy, Eray Kocel, Nikolay Dyaur, and Robert R. Stewart19 August 2013Analysis of passive surface waves from ambient-noise recordingsI. Panea, V. Mocanu, and C. Iacob13 December 2012 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 31, No. 12Near-surface geophysical imaging of Barringer (Meteor) Crater, ArizonaSoumya Roy, Robert R. Stewart, and Arkadiusz Turolski25 October 2012Near-surface Seismic Investigation of Barringer (Meteor) Crater, ArizonaSoumya Roy and Robert R. Stewart24 September 2012 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 17, No. 3Effective dispersion curve and pseudo multimode dispersion curves for Rayleigh wave4 April 2011 | Journal of Earth Science, Vol. 22, No. 2Imaging Dispersion of MASW Data—Full vs. Selective Offset SchemeChoon B. Park9 March 2011 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 16, No. 1Multi‐channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) of models with high shear‐wave velocity contrastJulian Ivanov, Richard D. Miller, Shelby Peterie, Chong Zeng, Jianghai Xia, and Tyler Schwenk8 August 2011Experimental estimation of soil profiles through spatial phases analysis of surface wavesSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 1Phase-scanning approach to correct time-shift inaccuracies in the surface-wave walk-away methodSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 12S-wave velocity and statics from ground-roll inversionSoumya Roy, Robert R. Stewart, and Khaled Al Dulaijan7 October 2010 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 29, No. 10S‐wave velocity from ground roll inversion: Source‐receiver tests and staticsSoumya Roy and Robert R. Stewart21 October 2010Fast simulated annealing inversion of surface waves on pavement using phase-velocity spectraNils Ryden and Choon Byong Park5 July 2006 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 71, No. 4Analyzing and Filtering Surface-Wave Energy By Muting Shot GathersJulian Ivanov, Choon B. Park, Richard D. Miller, and Jianghai Xia21 June 2012 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 10, No. 3Combined Use of Active and Passive Surface WavesC. B. Park, R. D. Miller, N. Ryden, J. Xia, and J. Ivanov21 June 2012 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 10, No. 3Resolution of High-frequency Rayleigh-wave DataJianghai Xia, Chao Chen, Gang Tian, Richard D. Miller, and Julian Ivanov21 June 2012 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 10, No. 2Multimodal Approach to Seismic Pavement TestingJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 6 Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2001ISSN (online):1554-8015Copyright: 2001 Pages: publication data© 2001 Copyright © 2001 The Environmental and Engineering Geophysical SocietyPublisher:Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society HistoryPublished Online: 30 Sep 2008 CITATION INFORMATION Choon Byong Park, Richard D. Miller, and Jianghai Xia, (2001), "Offset and Resolution of Dispersion Curve in Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)," Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings : SSM4-SSM4. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922953 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
-
Construction of 2-D Vertical Shear-Wave Velocity Field by the Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave Technique
Jianghai Xia,Richard D. Miller,Choon B. Park,Julian Ivanov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922726
2000-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2000Construction of 2‐D Vertical Shear‐Wave Velocity Field by the Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave TechniqueAuthors: Jianghai XiaRichard D. MillerChoon B. ParkJulian IvanovJianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, 1930 Constant Ave., Lawrence, Kansas 66047, Richard D. MillerKansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, 1930 Constant Ave., Lawrence, Kansas 66047, Choon B. ParkKansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, 1930 Constant Ave., Lawrence, Kansas 66047, and Julian IvanovKansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, 1930 Constant Ave., Lawrence, Kansas 66047https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922726 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Introductory paragraph for this paper is available only in the PDF and GZipped PS filesPermalink: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922726FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByReview on the Applications of Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) in Indian Subcontinent15 July 2022High-Frequency Surface-Wave Imaging from Traffic-Induced Noise by Selecting In-line Sources30 August 2022 | Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 10Subsurface Profiling Using Roadside MASW Survey: Influence of Multiple Sources and Offline DistanceJournal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 27, No. 2Killi zeminlerde MASW ile elde edilen kesme dalgası hızı ile plastisite indisi ve standart penetrasyon sayısı korelasyonu29 October 2020 | European Journal of Science and TechnologyIntegrated shallow seismic imaging of a settlement located in a historical landslide area4 December 2019 | Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol. 79, No. 4Shear Wave Velocity Characteristics in Parts of Muscat, Sultanate of Oman — A Measure of Earthquake Hazard Assessment24 May 2019 | Journal of the Geological Society of India, Vol. 93, No. 5Recommendations for generating dispersion images of optimal resolution from active MASW survey4 January 2018 | Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, Vol. 3, No. 1A state-of-the-art review of passive MASW survey for subsurface profiling19 September 2018 | Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, Vol. 3, No. 1Strong variation in weathering of layered rock maintains hillslope‐scale strength under high precipitation2 March 2018 | Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol. 43, No. 6Impact of Strike Energy on the Resolution of Dispersion Image in Active MASW Survey4 May 2018MASW Survey with Fixed Receiver Geometry and CMP Cross-Correlation Technique for Data Processing: A Case Study of Wadi Fatima, Western Saudi ArabiaOpen Journal of Geology, Vol. 08, No. 05Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) for seismic site characterization using 2D genetic algorithm at Bahrah area, Wadi Fatima, Saudi Arabia16 June 2016 | Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 9, No. 8Near-surface site characterization at Quriyat City, Sultanate of Oman using HVSR and MASW techniques9 December 2015 | Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 9, No. 1Deterministic seismic hazard assessment close to a gas field in northern Oman7 May 2014 | Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 8, No. 7Some Limits in the Use of the MASW Technique in Soils with Inclined Layers4 February 2015 | Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 3Combining surface waves and common methods for shallow geophysical survey1 June 2014 | Near Surface Geophysics, Vol. 13, No. 1Geophysical Methods for the Assessment of Earthen Dams6 December 2014Reliability of MASW profiling in near‐surface applications1 June 2014 | Near Surface Geophysics, Vol. 12, No. 6Delineation of a paleo-channel utilizing integrated geophysical techniques at the port of duqm area, sultanate of oman12 September 2014 | Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 5Efficiency of horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) in defining the fundamental frequency in Muscat Region, Sultanate of Oman: a comparative study5 May 2013 | Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 7, No. 6Seismic microzonation for Muscat region, Sultanate of Oman19 July 2013 | Natural Hazards, Vol. 69, No. 3Multiparameter analysis of geophysical methods for target detection: The unified geophysical model approachGEOPHYSICS, Vol. 78, No. 6Seismic microzonation of Dehradun City using geophysical and geotechnical characteristics in the upper 30 m of soil column24 July 2007 | Journal of Seismology, Vol. 11, No. 4Delineation of a collapse feature in a noisy environment using a multichannel surface wave techniqueGéotechnique, Vol. 54, No. 1 Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2000ISSN (online):1554-8015Copyright: 2000 Pages: 1255 publication data© 2000 Copyright © 2000 The Environmental and Engineering Geophysical SocietyPublisher:Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society HistoryPublished: 30 Sep 2008 CITATION INFORMATION Jianghai Xia, Richard D. Miller, Choon B. Park, and Julian Ivanov, (2000), "Construction of 2‐D Vertical Shear‐Wave Velocity Field by the Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave Technique," Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings : 1197-1206. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922726 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
-
Investigation and Use of Surface-wave Characteristics for Near-surface Applications
Yixian Xu,Yinhe Luo,Qing Liang,Liming Wang,Xianhai Song,Jiangping Liu,Chao Chen,Hanming Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802259.ch3
2010-01-01
Abstract:High-frequency surface-wave methods can provide reliable near-surface shear-wave (S-wave) velocity, which is a key parameter in many shallow-engineering applications, groundwater and environmental studies, and petroleum exploration. Recent research and key accomplishments at the China University of Geosciences at Wuhan into nearfield effects on surface-wave analysis provide not only insight into minimum-source geophone offsets required for generating high-quality surface-wave images but also provide a better understanding of the propagation characteristics of seismic wavefields through near-surface materials. New numerical modeling and dispersion-analysis algorithms are key tools used routinely in those studies. The modeling results illustrate very different energy-partitioning characteristics for Rayleigh and Love waves. Using a high-resolution linear Radon transform produces dispersion images with much better resolution and therefore represents a tool for more accurate separation and determination of phase velocities for different modes. Mode separation results in wavefield components that individually possess great potential for increasing horizontal resolution of S-wave velocity-field determinations. Amplitude corrections can significantly improve the accuracy of phase-velocity estimates from mixed-modal wavefields. Results from two simple models demonstrate how dramatic topographic changes can distort wavefields. This finding was the catalyst for suggesting that a topographic correction should be considered for surface-wave data acquired on a rugged ground surface. Phase-velocity inversion is an ill-posed problem. Rayleigh-wave sensitivity analysis reveals the difficulty in estimating S-wave velocities for a model with a low-velocity layer. Constraints in the model space are therefore necessary. Approximating cutoffs could help build a better initial model and provide critical information about the subsurface when higher modes are present.
-
Multisource Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves for Near-Surface Characterization in Urban Areas
Binbin Mi,Jianghai Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/iceg2021-033.1
2021-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSixth International Conference on Engineering Geophysics, Virtual, 25–28 October 2021Multisource multichannel analysis of surface waves for near-surface characterization in urban areasAuthors: Binbin MiJianghai XiaBinbin MiZhejiang UniversitySearch for more papers by this author and Jianghai XiaZhejiang UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/iceg2021-033.1 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract The urbanization over the world has great demand for the shallow subsurface space. Traditional geophysical methods face challenges on near-surface imaging for the development and utilization of underground space in urban areas. High-frequency surface wave methods provide alternatives for near-surface characterization. Urban traffic and traditional artificial seismic sources provide different kinds of sources for surface waves. A linear array along roads is efficient for data acquisition in urban environment. By multichannel analysis of multisource (active and passive) data, Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves in different frequency bands are inverted for multi-scale shear (S)-wave velocity structures. The combined use of multisource surface waves can provide a better way to characterize subsurface structures in urban areas. Field data examples demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of using multisource multichannel analysis of surface waves for near-surface characterization in urban areas. Keywords: Surface wave, near-surface, inversion, logging, imagingPermalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/iceg2021-033.1FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Sixth International Conference on Engineering Geophysics, Virtual, 25–28 October 2021ISSN (online):2159-6832Copyright: 2021 Pages: 341 publication data© 2021 Published in electronic format with permission by the Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 24 Dec 2021 CITATION INFORMATION Binbin Mi and Jianghai Xia, (2021), "Multisource multichannel analysis of surface waves for near-surface characterization in urban areas," SEG Global Meeting Abstracts : 122-125. https://doi.org/10.1190/iceg2021-033.1 Plain-Language Summary KeywordsSurface wavenear-surfaceinversionloggingimagingPDF DownloadLoading ...
-
Near-surface imaging from traffic-induced surface waves with dense linear arrays: An application in the urban area of Hangzhou, China
Binbin Mi,Jianghai Xia,Gang Tian,Zhanjie Shi,Huaixue Xing,Xiaojun Chang,Chaoqiang Xi,Ya Liu,Ling Ning,Tianyu Dai,Jingyin Pang,Xinhua Chen,Changjiang Zhou,Hongyu Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021-0184.1
IF: 3.264
2022-02-15
Geophysics
Abstract:Accurate understanding of near-surface structures of the solid earth is challenging, especially in urban areas where active source seismic surveys are constrained and difficult to perform. The analysis of anthropogenic seismic noise provides an alternative way to image the shallow subsurface in urban environments. We have developed an application of using traffic noise with seismic interferometry to investigate near-surface structures in Hangzhou City, Eastern China. Noise data were recorded by dense linear arrays with approximately 5 m spacing deployed along two crossing roads. We analyze the characteristics of traffic-induced noise using 36 h continuous recordings. Coherent Rayleigh surface waves between 2 and 20 Hz are retrieved based on crosscorrelations within 1 h time windows. Robust phase-velocity dispersion curves are extracted from virtual shot gathers using multichannel analysis of surface waves and coincide with the results from active seismic data, noise beamforming analysis, and measurements with the spatial autocorrelation method. S-wave velocity profiles are derived for the top 100 m of the subsurface at the array locations. The estimated S-wave velocities from traffic noise correspond to the velocities estimated from logging data. The 2D S-wave velocity maps reveal different soil deposits and bedrock structures in the estuarine sedimentary area. The results demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of delineating near-surface structures from traffic-induced noise, which has great potential for monitoring subsurface changes in urban areas.
geochemistry & geophysics
-
Retrieval of shallow S-wave profiles from seismic reflection surveying and traffic-induced noise
Kai Zhang,Hongyi Li,Xiaojiang Wang,Kai Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0845.1
IF: 3.264
2020-11-01
Geophysics
Abstract:In urban subsurface exploration, seismic surveys are mostly conducted along roads where seismic vibrators can be extensively used to generate strong seismic energy due to economic and environmental constraints. Generally, Rayleigh waves also are excited by the compressional wave profiling process. Shear-wave (S-wave) velocities can be inferred using Rayleigh waves to complement near-surface characterization. Most vibrators cannot excite seismic energy at lower frequencies (<5 Hz) to map greater depths during surface-wave analysis in areas with low S-wave velocities, but low-frequency surface waves ([Formula: see text]) can be extracted from traffic-induced noise, which can be easily obtained at marginal additional cost. We have implemented synthetic tests to evaluate the velocity deviation caused by offline sources, finding a reasonably small relative bias of surface-wave dispersion curves due to vehicle sources on roads. Using a 2D reflection survey and traffic-induced noise from the central North China Plain, we apply seismic interferometry to a series of 10.0 s segments of passive data. Then, each segment is selectively stacked on the acausal-to-causal ratio of the mean signal-to-noise ratio to generate virtual shot gathers with better dispersion energy images. We next use the dispersion curves derived by combining controlled source surveying with vehicle noise to retrieve the shallow S-wave velocity structure. A maximum exploration depth of 90 m is achieved, and the inverted S-wave profile and interval S-wave velocity model obtained from reflection processing appear consistent. The data set demonstrates that using surface waves derived from seismic reflection surveying and traffic-induced noise provides an efficient supplementary technique for delineating shallow structures in areas featuring thick Quaternary overburden. Additionally, the field test indicates that traffic noise can be created using vehicles or vibrators to capture surface waves within a reliable frequency band of 2–25 Hz if no vehicles are moving along the survey line.
geochemistry & geophysics
-
Multichannel Analysis of Underwater Surface Waves Near Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Choon B. Park,Richard D. Miller,Jianghai Xia,Julian Ivanov,James A. Hunter,R. L. Good,R. A. Burns
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1815635
2000-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2000Multichannel analysis of underwater surface waves near Vancouver, B.C., CanadaAuthors: Choon B. ParkRichard D. MillerJianghai XiaJulian IvanovJames A. HunterR. L. GoodR. A. BurnsChoon B. ParkKansas Geological Survey, Richard D. MillerKansas Geological Survey, Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, Julian IvanovKansas Geological Survey, James A. HunterGeological Survey of Canada, R. L. GoodGeological Survey of Canada, and R. A. BurnsGeological Survey of Canadahttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.1815635 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1815635FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByReview and Future Perspective of Geophysical Methods Applied in Nearshore Site Characterization1 March 2022 | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 3Velocity gradients choice affecting seismic site response in deep alluvial basins: Application to the Venetian Plain (Northern Italy)25 January 2022 | Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 1Seismic imaging of S-wave structures of shallow sediments in the East China Sea using OBN multicomponent Scholte-wave dataYuan Wang, Zhiwei Li, Jianhua Geng, Qingyu You, Tianyao Hao, Yaoxing Hu, Chunlei Zhao, Yan Zhang, and Yuzhu Liu21 October 2020 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 85, No. 6MASW Survey to Map Soil Layers and Rock Profiles in a Construction Site19 September 2020Assessment of an MASW Approach Incorporating Discrete Particle ModelingShane Donohue and Michael Long21 June 2012 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 13, No. 2Joint analysis of refractions with surface waves: An inverse solution to the refraction-traveltime problemJulian Ivanov, Richard D. Miller, Jianghai Xia, Don Steeples, and Choon B. Park3 November 2006 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 71, No. 6Estimation of Elastic Moduli in a Compressible Gibson Half-space by Inverting Rayleigh-wave Phase VelocitySurveys in Geophysics, Vol. 27, No. 1Variability of Scholte-wave Dispersion in Shallow-water Marine SedimentsSimone Kugler, Thomas Bohlen, Sascha Bussat, and Gerald Klein21 June 2012 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 10, No. 2Evaluation of MASW Data Acquired with a Hydrophone Streamer in a Shallow Marine EnvironmentRonald D. Kaufmann, Jianghai Xia, Richard C. Benson, Lynn B. Yuhr, Daniel W. Casto, and Choon B. Park21 June 2012 | Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 10, No. 2Acquisition and Inversion of Dispersive Seismic Waves in Shallow Marine EnvironmentsMarine Geophysical Researches, Vol. 26, No. 2-41.5D inversion of lateral variation of Scholte‐wave dispersionGEOPHYSICS, Vol. 69, No. 2 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2000ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2000 Pages: 2484 publication data© 2000 Copyright © 2000 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished: 04 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION Choon B. Park, Richard D. Miller, Jianghai Xia, Julian Ivanov, James A. Hunter, R. L. Good, and R. A. Burns, (2000), "Multichannel analysis of underwater surface waves near Vancouver, B.C., Canada," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1303-1306. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1815635 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
-
High-Frequency Rayleigh Wave And Its Applications In Near-Surface Geophysics
Jianghai Xia,Richard Daniel J Miller,ChoonByong Park,Julian M. Ivanov,Gang Tian,Chao Chen
2004-01-01
Abstract:The shear (S)-wave velocity of near-surface materials (such as soil, rocks, and pavement) and its effect on seismic- wave propagation are of fundamental interest in many ground-water, engineering, and environmental studies. The Kansas Geological Survey conducted a project to estimate near-surface S-wave velocity from Rayleigh waves (multichannel analysis of surface waves-MASW). The MASW method is a non-invasive acoustic approach to estimate near-surface S-wave velocity from surface-wave energy. The differences between MASW results and direct borehole measurements are approximately 15% or less and random. The MASW method is a promising alternative to the S-wave reflection/refraction survey to define S-wave velocity or geological interfaces. Shear-wave velocities calculated by the MASW method can be used in the static correction of S-wave survey. A 2-D S-wave velocity field produced by the MASW method with a common midpoint roll-along acquisition format has direct applications in characterization of near-surface materials. This research project has been expanded to analyze the effects of higher modes on inversion of surface waves and depth of investigation and the feasibility of estimating the near-surface quality factor (Q) by inverting attenuation coefficients of Rayleigh waves. This paper summarizes these research results and introduces future research directions of high-frequency surface waves.
-
Enhancing Noise Sources in Stationary-Phase Zones for Accurate Phase-Velocity Estimation of High-Frequency Surface Waves
Ya Liu,Jianghai Xia,Chaoqiang Xi,Hao Zhang,Bo Guan,Tianyu Dai,Ling Ning
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021-0696.1
IF: 3.264
2022-01-01
Geophysics
Abstract:Passive surface-wave methods are appealing tools for their ability to noninvasively obtain shear-wave velocity with high accuracy and low costs. A linear array of stations is widely adopted in urban areas for its convenient deployments and efficient utilization of ambient noise energy from stationary-phase zones (SPZs), which contributes the most to surface-wave retrieval. However, noise sources in nonstationary-phase zones may threaten the reliability of velocity estimation when they possess strong energy. To obtain reliable phase-velocity estimation of high-frequency surface waves (>1 Hz), we enhance the contribution of noise sources in SPZs by using the multichannel-coherency-weighted stack (MCWS) method for the stacking of noise crosscorrelation functions and dispersion spectra. We model a nonuniform source distribution with strong offline sources. The seismic interferometry (SI) and passive multichannel analysis of surface waves (PMASW) methods overestimate velocities at lower frequencies (<5 Hz), whereas phase velocities of short wavelengths are relatively accurate. The true velocities of short wavelengths are then set as the velocity scanning range for MCWS, and the waves whose apparent velocities lie within the scanning range would be emphasized by MCWS. Noise sources in SPZs are enhanced because the apparent velocities of waves from other noise sources are higher and not in the scanning range. After using MCWS, the phase-velocity estimations of SI and PMASW are consistent with the theoretical dispersion curve. A field data example at a crossroads demonstrates that uneven source distributions might cause serious artifacts and the feasibility of our method is again confirmed. In addition, the enhancement of noise sources in SPZs is verified through noise source distribution imaging by a matched field processing technique.
-
Progress and prospect of surface-wave imaging techniques in near-surface applications
Wang Limin,Xia Jianghai,Luo Yinhe,Bian Aifei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19975/j.dqyxx.2022-008
2022-01-01
Abstract:Elastic properties of near-surface materials and their effects on seismic wave propagation are of fundamental interest in groundwater, engineering, and environmental studies. Shear-wave velocity is used to determine 'stiffness', one of the key properties in construction engineering. Since, shear wave velocity is a function of depth, it can be derived from inverting the phase-velocity dispersion curve of the surface wave. The dispersion curves of surface waves can be extract from both the active source stimulated seismograms and the seismic ambient noise data. Surface-wave imaging technologies based on active and passive sources have been developed rapidly in recent years. They are widely applied in global and regional Earth's interior imaging, energy resources exploration, near-surface geological survey, non-destructive testing and environmental survey. Surface waves are interesting because they can be used to develop noninvasive techniques for characterizing a medium at small, large, and intermediate scales. Thanks to the lively scientific debate among different disciplines, the surface-wave imaging method is under continuous and rapid evolution, and interest in the technique has increased significantly during the last decade. By literature investigating, it can be concluded that research on surface-wave methods including, but not limited to the following aspects: forward calculating techniques of surface-wave dispersion curves, numerical simulating of propagation of surface waves, surface-wave properties in medium with complex structures, dispersion energy curves extracting techniques from multichannel surface-wave data, inversion algorithm of surface-wave dispersion curves, properties of multi-mode surface waves, properties of multi-component surface waves, properties of surface waves in layered medium with hard or soft layer, techniques of extracting high-resolution dispersion curves from seismic ambient noise data, full-waveform inversion of surface-wave data, application of higher-modes surface wave data, surface-wave data acquisition techniques, and so on. As a reviewing article, we briefly introduce the research history of surface-wave imaging methods based on Rayleigh and Love waves. The research and application status of higher-mode surface wave, surface-wave waveform inversion, ambient noise-based surface-wave imaging method and multi-component surface-wave imaging are discussed in detail. We also introduce some new technology in surface-wave data acquisition and processing, such as the distributed acoustic sensing and the high-speed-train seismology. Finally, we give an outlook for future development of surface-wave imaging technology.
-
Using Vehicle‐Induced DAS Signals for Near‐Surface Characterization With High Spatiotemporal Resolution
Siyuan Yuan,Jingxiao Liu,Hae Young Noh,Robert Clapp,Biondo Biondi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jb028033
2024-04-25
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Abstract:Abstract Vehicle‐induced seismic waves, generated as vehicles traverse the ground surface, carry valuable information for imaging the underlying near‐surface structure. These waves propagate differently in the subsurface depending on soil properties at various spatial locations. By leveraging wave propagation characteristics, such as surface‐wave velocity and attenuation, this study presents a novel method for near‐surface monitoring. Our method employs passing vehicles as active, non‐dedicated seismic sources and leverages pre‐existing telecommunication fibers as large‐scale and cost‐effective roadside sensors empowered by Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) technology. A specialized Kalman filter algorithm is integrated for automated DAS‐based traffic monitoring to accurately determine vehicles' location and speed. Then, our approach uniquely leverages vehicle trajectories to isolate space‐time windows containing high‐quality surface waves. With known vehicle (i.e., seismic source) locations, we can effectively mitigate artifacts associated with suboptimal distribution of sources in conventional ambient noise interferometry. Compared to ambient noise interferometry, our approach enables the synthesis of virtual shot gathers with a high signal‐to‐noise ratio and spatiotemporal resolution at reduced computational costs. We validate the effectiveness of our method using the Stanford DAS‐2 array, with a focus on capturing spatial heterogeneity and monitoring temporal variations in soil seismic properties during rainfall events. Specifically, in non‐built‐up areas, we observed an evident decrease in phase velocity and group velocity and an increase in attenuation due to the rainfall. Our findings illustrate our method's sensitivity and resolution in discerning variations across different spatial locations and demonstrate that our method is a promising advancement for high‐resolution near‐surface imaging in urban settings.
geochemistry & geophysics
-
Multi‐channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) of Models with High Shear‐wave Velocity Contrast
Julian Ivanov,Richard D. Miller,Shelby Peterie,Chong Zeng,Jianghai Xia,Tyler Schwenk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3627461
2011-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011Multi‐channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) of models with high shear‐wave velocity contrastAuthors: Julian IvanovRichard D. MillerShelby PeterieChong ZengJianghai XiaTyler SchwenkJulian IvanovKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, Richard D. MillerKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, Shelby PeterieKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, Chong ZengKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, and Tyler SchwenkKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.3627461 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract We use the multi‐channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) method to analyze synthetic seismic data calculated using models with high shear‐wave velocity (Vs) contrast. The MASW dispersion‐curve images of the Rayleigh wave are obtained using various sets of source‐offset and spread‐size configurations from the synthetic seismic data and compared with the theoretically calculated fundamental‐ and higher‐mode dispersion‐curves. Such tests showed that most of the dispersion‐curve images are dominated by higher‐mode energy at the low frequencies, especially when analyzing data from long receiver offsets and thus significantly divert from numerically expected dispersion‐curve trends, which can lead to significant Vs overestimation. Further analysis showed that using data with relatively short spread lengths and source offsets can image the desired fundamental‐mode of the Rayleigh wave that matches the numerically expected dispersion‐curve pattern. As a result, it was concluded that it might be possible to avoid higher‐mode contamination at low frequencies at sites with high (Vs) contrast by appropriate selection of spread size and seismic source offset.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3627461FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByMATLAB codes for generating dispersion images for ground exploration using different multichannel analysis of surface wave transformsTarun Naskar and Jyant Kumar10 March 2022 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 87, No. 3Passive multichannel analysis of surface waves using 1D and 2D receiver arraysSarah L. Morton, Julian Ivanov, Shelby L. Peterie, Richard D. Miller, and Amanda J. Livers-Douglas23 September 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 86, No. 6Methods to isolate retrograde and prograde Rayleigh-wave signals26 July 2019 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 219, No. 2Isolating retrograde and prograde Rayleigh-wave modes using a polarity muteGabriel Gribler, Lee M. Liberty, T. Dylan Mikesell, and Paul Michaels11 August 2016 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 81, No. 5Characteristics of the horizontal component of Rayleigh waves in multimode analysis of surface wavesTatsunori Ikeda, Toshifumi Matsuoka, Takeshi Tsuji, and Toru Nakayama1 December 2014 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 80, No. 1Dispersion interpretation from synthetic seismograms and multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW)J. Tyler Schwenk, Richard Miller, Julian Ivanov, and Jason McKenna25 October 2012 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2011 Pages: 4424 Publisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished: 08 Aug 2011 CITATION INFORMATION Julian Ivanov, Richard D. Miller, Shelby Peterie, Chong Zeng, Jianghai Xia, and Tyler Schwenk, (2011), "Multi‐channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) of models with high shear‐wave velocity contrast," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1384-1390. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3627461 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
-
Near-surface Characterization Using a Roadside Distributed Acoustic Sensing Array
Siyuan Yuan,Ariel Lellouch,Robert G. Clapp,Biondo Biondi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.01360
2020-06-02
Abstract:Thanks to the broadband nature of the Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) measurement, a roadside section of the Stanford DAS-2 array can record seismic signals from various sources. For example, it measures the earth's quasi-static distortion caused by the weight of cars (<0.8 Hz), and Rayleigh waves induced by earthquakes (<3 Hz) and by dynamic car-road interactions (3-20 Hz). We directly utilize the excited surface waves for shallow shear-wave velocity inversion. Rayleigh waves induced by passing cars have a consistent fundamental mode and a noisier first mode. By stacking dispersion images of 33 passing cars, we obtain stable dispersion images. The frequency range of the fundamental mode can be extended by adding the low-frequency earthquake-induced Rayleigh waves. Thanks to the extended frequency range, we can achieve better depth coverage and resolution for shear-wave velocity inversion. In order to assure clear separation from Love waves and aligning apparent velocity with phase velocity, we choose an earthquake that is approximately in line with the array. The inverted models match those obtained by a conventional geophone survey performed by a geotechnical service company contracted by Stanford University using active sources from the surface until about 50 meters. In order to automate the Vs inversion process, we introduce a new objective function that avoids manual dispersion curve picking. We construct a 2-D Vs profile by performing independent 1-D inversions at multiple locations along the fiber. From the low-frequency quasi-static distortion recordings, we invert for a single Poisson's ratio at each location along the fiber. We observe spatial heterogeneity of both Vs and Poisson's ratio profiles. Our approach is dramatically cheaper than ambient field interferometry and reliable estimates can be obtained more frequently as no lengthy cross-correlations are required.
Geophysics,Signal Processing
-
Numerical investigation of 3D MASW technique
Limin Wang,Jianghai Xia,Yixian Xu,Yinhe Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/nsapc2015-071
2015-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessNear-Surface Asia Pacific Conference, Waikoloa, Hawaii, 7-10 July 2015Numerical investigation of 3D MASW techniqueAuthors: Limin WangJianghai XiaYixian XuYinhe LuoLimin WangHubei Subsurface Multi-scale Imaging Key Laboratory, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, P.R. China and China University of Geosciences, Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Jianghai XiaHubei Subsurface Multi-scale Imaging Key Laboratory, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, P.R. China and China University of Geosciences, Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Yixian XuHubei Subsurface Multi-scale Imaging Key Laboratory, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, P.R. China and China University of Geosciences, Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, and Yinhe LuoHubei Subsurface Multi-scale Imaging Key Laboratory, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, P.R. China and China University of Geosciences, Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, P.R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/nsapc2015-071 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) method is an efficient tool to obtain near-surface S-wave velocity, and has gained popularity in engineering practice. Up to now, most examples of using the MASW technique are focused on 2D models or data from a 2D linear receiver spread. We propose a 3D MASW scheme, which extend the surface-wave analysis from 2D to 3D area. Similar to a middle-of-receiver-spread assumption for the 2D MASW technique, an orthocenter-of-acquisition-geometry assumption for our 3D MASW technique is proposed in this paper. A feasible Finite-difference (FD) scheme is firstly proposed and used to perform numerical simulations for investigating our true 3D MASW method. Meanwhile, we design an acquisition geometry to receive synthetic seismograms, which include three linear receiver spreads and three fan-shaped acquisition geometries. Two simple numerical examples and many other numerical examples which are not shown in this paper, verify the orthocenterof-acquisition-geometry assumption of 3D MASW method. At last, we numerically investigate the relation between the array size and the resolution of dispersion measurement in 3D MASW tests, by a simple 3D two-layer model with rectangular receiver array. Keywords: MASW, 3D, 2DPermalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/nsapc2015-071FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Near-Surface Asia Pacific Conference, Waikoloa, Hawaii, 7-10 July 2015ISSN (online):2159-6832Copyright: 2015 Pages: 501 publication data© 2015 Published in electronic format with permission by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Chinese Geophysical Society, Korean Society of Earth and Exploration Geophysicists, and Society of Exploration Geophysicists of JapanPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 10 Jul 2015 CITATION INFORMATION Limin Wang, Jianghai Xia, Yixian Xu, and Yinhe Luo, (2015), "Numerical investigation of 3D MASW technique," SEG Global Meeting Abstracts : 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1190/nsapc2015-071 Plain-Language Summary KeywordsMASW3D2DPDF DownloadLoading ...
-
Blast-Assisted Subsurface Characterisation Using a Novel Distributed Acoustic Sensing Setup Based on Geometric Phases
Sabahat Shaheen,Konstantin Hicke,Katerina Krebber
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010030
2023-12-20
Abstract:A novel DAS setup based on geometric phases in coherent heterodyne detection is applied for the first time to the characterisation of the Earth's subsurface. In addition, an optimisation of the proposed setup in terms of its spatial resolution is also presented for the first time. The surface waves are generated by strong blasts of 25 kg of explosives at a dedicated test site. A 10 km dark fiber link in the vicinity of the test site connected to the test setup records the resulting strain signals. The spike-free and low-noise strain data thus obtained minimize post-processing requirements, making the setup a candidate for real-time seismic monitoring. An analysis of the dispersion characteristics of the generated surface waves is performed using a recently reported optimised seismic interferometric technique. Based on the dispersion characteristics, the shear wave velocities of the surface waves as a function of the depth profile of the Earth's crust are determined using an optimised evolutionary algorithm.
-
Novel techniques for in situ estimation of shear-wave velocity and damping ratio through MASW testing – I: a beamforming procedure for extracting Rayleigh-wave phase velocity and phase attenuation
Mauro Aimar,Sebastiano Foti,Brady R Cox
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae051
IF: 3.352
2024-02-02
Geophysical Journal International
Abstract:SUMMARY A robust, in situ estimate of shear-wave velocity VS and the small-strain damping ratio DS (or equivalently, the quality factor QS) is crucial for the design of buildings and geotechnical systems subjected to vibrations or earthquake ground shaking. A promising technique for simultaneously obtaining both VS and DS relies on the Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) method. MASW can be used to extract the Rayleigh wave phase velocity and phase attenuation data from active-source seismic traces recorded along linear arrays. Then, these data can be inverted to obtain VS and DS profiles. This paper introduces two novel methodologies for extracting the phase velocity and attenuation data. These new approaches are based on an extension of the beamforming technique which can be combined with a modal filter to isolate different Rayleigh propagation modes. Thus, the techniques return reliable phase velocity and attenuation estimates even in the presence of a multimode wavefield, which is typical of complex stratigraphic conditions. The reliability and effectiveness of the proposed approaches are assessed on a suite of synthetic wavefields and on experimental data collected at the Garner Valley Downhole Array and Mirandola sites. The results reveal that, under proper modelling of wavefield conditions, accurate estimates of Rayleigh wave phase velocity and attenuation can be extracted from active-source MASW wavefields over a broad frequency range. Eventually, the estimation of soil mechanical parameters also requires a robust inversion procedure to map the experimental Rayleigh wave parameters into soil models describing VS and DS with depth. The simultaneous inversion of phase velocity and attenuation data is discussed in detail in the companion paper.
geochemistry & geophysics
-
Research on Dispersion Curves of Masw
Yinhe Luo,Jianghai Xia,Jiangping Liu,Yixian Xu,Qingsheng Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2924645
2007-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2007Research on Dispersion Curves of MASWAuthors: Yinhe LuoJianghai XiaJiangping LiuYixian XuQingsheng LiuYinhe LuoInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USASearch for more papers by this author, Jiangping LiuInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Yixian XuInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, and Qingsheng LiuInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.4133/1.2924645 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract The multichannel analysis of surface wave (MASW) method has been effectively used to determine near‐surface shear (S)‐wave velocity and map bedrock. Estimating the S‐wave velocity profile from Rayleigh‐wave measurements is straightforward. A three‐step process is required to obtain S‐wave velocity profiles: acquisition of a multiple number of multichannel records along a linear survey line by use of the roll‐along mode, extraction of dispersion curves of Rayleigh waves and inversion of dispersion curves for an S‐wave velocity profile for each shot gather. A pseudo‐2D S‐wave velocity section can be generated by aligning 1D S‐wave velocity models at the midpoint of each spread. This process implies that the extracted dispersion curve is only determined by the geophysical structure within the geophone spread and not affected by the source geophysical structure. In this paper, dispersion curves of synthetic dataset by fixing the receiver spread and changing the source location are calculated to testify the assumption of MASW. Results demonstrate that the dispersion curves are affected by the whole acquisition system including source and receiver spread structure.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2924645FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2007ISSN (online):1554-8015Copyright: 2007 Pages: 1557 publication data© 2007 Copyright © 2007 The Environmental and Engineering Geophysical SocietyPublisher:Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society HistoryPublished: 30 Sep 2008 CITATION INFORMATION Yinhe Luo, Jianghai Xia, Jiangping Liu, Yixian Xu, and Qingsheng Liu, (2007), "Research on Dispersion Curves of MASW," Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings : 1379-1387. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2924645 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
-
Estimation of Near-Surface Shear-Wave Velocities and Quality Factors Using Multichannel Analysis of Surface-Wave Methods
Jianghai Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.01.016
IF: 1.845
2014-01-01
Journal of Applied Geophysics
Abstract:This overview article gives a picture of multichannel analysis of high-frequency surface (Rayleigh and Love) waves developed mainly by research scientists at the Kansas Geological Survey, the University of Kansas and China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) during the last eighteen years by discussing dispersion imaging techniques, inversion systems, and real-world examples. Shear (S)-wave velocities of near-surface materials can be derived from inverting the dispersive phase velocities of high-frequency surface waves. Multichannel analysis of surface waves-MASW used phase information of high-frequency Rayleigh waves recorded on vertical component geophones to determine near-surface S-wave velocities. The differences between MASW results and direct borehole measurements are approximately 15% or less and random. Studies show that inversion with higher modes and the fundamental mode simultaneously can increase model resolution and an investigation depth. Multichannel analysis of Love waves-MALW used phase information of high-frequency Love waves recorded on horizontal (perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation) component geophones to determine S-wave velocities of shallow materials. Because of independence of compressional (P)-wave velocity, the MALW method has some attractive advantages, such as 1) Love-wave dispersion curves are simpler than Rayleigh wave's; 2) dispersion images of Love-wave energy have a higher signal to noise ratio and more focused than those generated from Rayleigh waves; and 3) inversion of Love-wave dispersion curves is less dependent on initial models and more stable than Rayleigh waves.To derive S-wave velocities of near-surface materials from high-frequency surface waves only utilizes their phase information. Feasibility of using their amplitude information to estimate near-surface quality factors (Q(s), and/or Q(p)) has been studied. Attenuation coefficients of high-frequency surface (Rayleigh and/or Love) waves can be calculated from their amplitude. And by inverting attenuation coefficients, it is feasible to obtain quality factors. Similar to inverting phase velocities of Love waves for S-wave velocities, attenuation coefficients of Love waves are independent of Q(p), Which makes inversion of attenuation coefficients of Love waves to estimate Q(s) simpler than that of Rayleigh waves.Both MASW and MALW methods to estimate near-surface S-wave velocities are non-invasive, non-destructive, environment-friendly, low-cost, fast, and in situ seismic methods and possess stable and efficient inversion algorithms to invert phase velocities of surface waves. Real world examples demonstrated that near-surface S-wave velocities derived from phase information are reliable and that methods discussed in the paper to estimate nearsurface quality factors from amplitude information are feasible.(C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
-
Recent Advances In High-Frequency Surface-Wave Methods
Jianghai Xia,Lingli Gao,Yudi Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/iceg2015-011
2014-01-01
Abstract:Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) analyzes high-frequency Rayleigh waves to determine near-surface shear (S)-wave velocities. The method is getting increasingly attention in the near-surface geophysics and geotechnique community in the past 20 years because of its non-invasive, non-destructive, efficient, and low-cost advantages. They are viewed by near-surface geophysics community as one of most promise techniques in the future. However, they face unique problems related to extremely irregular velocity variations in near-surface geology or man-made constructions, for example, highway, foundation, dam, levee, jetty, etc., which are not solvable by techniques or algorithms widely used in earthquake seismology or oil/gas seismic exploration.Calculation of dispersion curves by existing algorithms may fail for some special velocity models due to velocity inverse (a high-velocity layer on the top of a low-velocity layer). Two velocity models are most common in near-surface applications. One is a low-velocity half space model and the other a high-velocity surface layer. The former model results in a complex matrix that no roots can be found in the real number domain, which implies that no phase velocities can be calculated in certain frequency ranges based on current existing algorithms. A solution is to use the real part of the root of the complex number. It is well-known that phase velocities approach about 91% of the S-wave velocity of the surface layer when wavelengths are much shorter than the thickness of the surface layer. The later model, however, results in that phase velocities in a high-frequency range, calculated using the current algorithms, approach a velocity associated with the S-wave velocity of the low-velocity layer NOT the surface layer. A solution to this problem is to use an equivalent layer model to calculate phase velocities when wavelengths are shorter than certain threshold (around 2h, h is the total thickness of the layers on the top of the low-velocity layer). The algorithm that we newly developed can handle any arbitrary velocity models, which is the foundation of high-frequency Rayleigh-wave methods and is critical to near-surface applications.Non-geometric wave exists uniquely in near-surface materials, especially in unconsolidated sediments. It occurs in near-offsets in high-frequency Rayleigh data. It is valuable for a quick and accurate estimation of S-wave velocity of the surface layer. Our study shows that non-geometric waves are leaky waves and dispersive. Leaky surface wave could cause misidentification when treating the leaky-wave energy as fundamental or higher modes. Such misidentification will result in wrong inversion results.Recently developed Multi-channel Analysis of Love Waves (MALW) is another powerful tool in determining near-surface S-wave velocities. Unlike Rayleigh waves, the dispersive nature of Love waves is independent of P-wave velocity. Approximating SH-wave velocities using MALW in near-surface applications may become more appealing than MASW because it possesses three advantages: 1) Love-wave dispersion curves simpler than Rayleigh waves; 2) Dispersion images of Love-wave energy have a higher signal to noise ratio and more focus than those generated from Rayleigh waves; and 3) Inversion of Love-wave dispersion curves is less dependent on initial models and more stable than Rayleigh waves.
-
New Developments In Analysis Of High-Frequency Rayleigh Waves
Jianghai Xia,Yixian Xu,Richard D. Miller,Chao Chen
2006-01-01
Abstract:The shear (S)-wave velocity of near-surface materials (such as soil, rocks, and pavement) and its effect on seismic-wave propagation are of fundamental interest in many ground-water, engineering, and environmental studies. The multichannel analysis of surface waves has been applied to various near-surface problems. Tens near-surface Rayleigh wave application papers have appeared in the literature over last eight years. Surface-wave techniques show their capability of providing accurate S-wave velocities of shallow materials and high potential of providing attenuation properties of near-surface rocks. New developments in surface-wave techniques have been made over the last two years. We developed a scheme using the finite-difference method to model high-frequency Rayleigh-waves in near-surface mediums. This stable and efficient scheme provides a valuable tool in understanding of characteristics of Rayleigh waves in various near-surface geological settings. We have developed an algorithm of estimating S-wave velocities of a compressible Gibson half-space (a non-layered earth model) from Rayleigh waves. This algorithm allows us to estimate S-wave velocities of the non-layered earth model with minimum of three Rayleigh-wave phase velocities. We have also developed an algorithm of generating image of dispersive energy by slant stacking. The real power of the algorithm is its capability to generate an image of dispersive energy from data acquired in an arbitrary acquisition geometry (for example fan configuration), which lays down a foundation for true 3D surface-wave analysis. We have studied feasibility of detecting voids with Rayleigh-wave diffraction. The results of this study are encouraging.