The Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light Combined with Meibomian Gland Massage in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction-Related Dry Eyes Using the Meibomian Gland Analysis System
戴鹏飞,李颖,王玉倩,王洁,刘文婷,李云鹏
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210228-00079
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective::To observe the therapeutic effects of intense pulsed light (IPL) combined with meibomian gland massage on dry eyes associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) using the meibomian gland analysis system.Methods::This study was a case series study. A total of 37 outpatients (74 eyes) with MGD-related dry eyes were selected from July 2019 to August 2019 at Xi'an Fourth Hospital. Patients underwent IPL treatment combined with meibomian gland massage (once every three weeks, three times in all). Intergroup comparisons of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), non-invasive tear film rupture time (NITBUT), non-invasive lacrimal river height measurement (NITMH), meibomian gland yielding secretion score (MGYSS), deformation coefficient and photographic value of the meibomian gland analysis system were performed before treatment and after the first, second, and third treatments. A repeated measurement analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for evaluation. Pearson linear correlation analysis was used to assess the relationships between the deformation coefficient and the photographic value of the meibomian gland and other variables of ocular surface function. The therapeutic effects of IPL combined with meibomian gland massage on dry eyes associated with MGD were further evaluated.Results::Indexes, including OSDI, NITBUT, MGYSS and photographic value, at each time point after treatment were significantly improved compared with those before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (
P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the deformation coefficient after the first and second treatments, while the deformation coefficient significantly decreased after the third treatment (
P=0.01). NITMH data showed no significant improvement at each time point after treatment compared with before treatment, and the difference was not statistically significant. As the trends for the indicators changed, OSDI, NITBUT, MGYSS and photographic values continued to improve after the first treatment, and were best after the third treatment. In addition, the deformation coefficient changed gently, with a significant improvement only after the third treatment. The results showed that the deformation coefficient of the meibomian gland was positively correlated with OSDI (
r=0.379,
P=0.01), negatively correlated with NITBUT (
r=-0.427,
P=0.01), and had no correlation with NITMH and MGYSS. The photographic value of the meibomian gland had a significant negative correlation with OSDI (
r=-0.904,
P<0.001), a positive correlation with NITBUT (
r=0.947,
P<0.001) and MGYSS (
r=0.467,
P<0.001), and had no correlation with NITMH. In the study, there was no irreversible eyelid skin injury, no anterior segment inflammatory reaction, iris depigmentation, ocular surface or fundus injury, decreased vision, high intraocular pressure or other complications.
Conclusions::Both intense pulsed light combined with palpebral gland massage are convenient, safe and effective for MGD-related dry eyes. The meibomian gland analysis system can monitor the secretion capacity of glands to a certain extent, which can be used as a supplementary means to evaluate the therapeutic effect through specific quantitative data such as the photographic value.