Distinguish the visual top-down spatial attentional neural network between normal and dementia
yasuyuki ohta,koji abe,kewei chen,yong shen,jinglong wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.650
2011-01-01
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Abstract:Disturbance of attentional processes represents the first cognitive indicator of neocortical dysfunction in early stage of Dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). Our previous tactile angle discrimination task showed that MCI (mild cognitive impairment) and DAT might be caused, at least partially, attentional dysfunction (Yang et al., JAD, 2010). Disconnection between frontal and posterior parietal areas may mediate the selective disruption of attentional functions in DAT. By using Posner task (Posner MI, Q J Exp Psychol, 1980) and fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging), we intended to examine the attention related neural network difference between normal and DAT/MCI patients. Data from 16 normal young (NY), 16 normal elder (NE) and 16 MCI/DAT patients were used. The Posner task used in this study was the spatial attention and the spatial expectation. The target stimulus was used with a width and height both of 2 degrees of eccentricity. For the spatial attention task, participants were constructed to pay attention to the side at which custimulus was presented and to press the reaction key as quickly as possible when the target stimulus was to appear. During the spatial expectation task, cue was presented until the target stimulus appeared. Images were pre-processed using SPM8 and the general linear model determined task vs control condition fMRI signal differences from regions of interest (ROI) (IPL, inferior parietal lobe; MT+, contain both middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST); FEF, frontal eye field; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus, all in right hemisphere) and right motor area were further statistically examined using SPSS. Reaction times showed a reaction speed order was in a good agreement with NY (normal younger)> NE (normal elder) > MCI/DAT as the same as the accuracy (p < 0.05 between normal and patient groups). fMRI results found distinct differences among the three groups under the two tasks, respectively, in a number of ROI analyzed. Especially, during the top-down spatial attention task, 4 regions (IPL, MT+, FEF and IFG, all in right hemisphere) were associated with group differences (p = 0.05). During the spatial expectation task, a significant magnitude difference of ROI-based signal change was found within the right motor area (p = 0.05). Using the Posner experimental paradigm, we found the differences among NY, NE and MCI/DAT patients both from behavioral and brain imaging results. Additional studies with more advanced analytic techniques are needed to confirm our findings.