Intra-Arrest Rapid Head Cooling Improves Postresuscitation Myocardial Function In Comparison With Delayed Postresuscitation Surface Cooling

Min-Shan Tsai,Denise Barbut,Hao Wang,Jun Guan,Shijie Sun,Becky Inderbitzen,Max Harry Weil,Wanchun Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818a88b6
IF: 8.8
2008-01-01
Critical Care Medicine
Abstract:Objective: To compare resuscitation outcomes and myocardial function among intra-arrest head cooling, delayed surface cooling, and uncooled controls.Design: Prospective animal study.Setting: University-affiliated animal research laboratory.Subjects: Twenty-four male domestic pigs.Interventions: Ventricular fibrillation remained untreated for 10 mins after which animals were assigned into three groups: 1) intra-arrest head cooling, 2) postresuscitation surface cooling, and 3) uncooled controls. Head cooling by evaporative perfluorochemical began coincident with the start of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and continued for a total of 4 hrs. Surface cooling using a cooling blanket began at 2 hrs after return of spontaneous circulation and continued for 8 hrs. Control animals were treated identically with the exception for cooling.Measurements and Main Results: Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in eight of eight head-cooled animals, in seven of eight surface-cooled animals, and in seven of eight of controls. Myocardial functions measured by transthoracic echocardiography were significantly better in the head-cooled animals than in surface-cooled and controls. All head-cooled animals survived for more than 96 hrs. This contrasted with six of eight survivors after surface cooling, and only two of eight among controls.Conclusions: Both intra-arrest head cooling and delayed surface cooling improved postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. The beneficial effects were greatest with head cooling initiated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation. (Crit Care Med 2008; 36[Suppl.]:S434-S439)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?