Comparison of Different Methods for Measurement of Microalbuminuria

Zhang Xiao-mei,Hu Zhao-Heng,Liang Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-0959.2007.03.007
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical utility and accuracy amoag three assays of Micral-Test strip,DCA 2000 analyz- er and radioimmunoassay for detection of microalbuminuria and compare effect of urine collection ways on the results.Methods:A total of 30 random urine samples of patients with diabetes were determined by three assays for detection of microalbuminuria and the results were compared with 24-hour urinary albumin(24h UAL).Results:The values determined by the three assays were correlative(P<0.01).Compared with the values of 24-hour urinary albumin,the correlated coefficient of Micral-Test strip and DCA2000+ ACR was 0.448,0.861 respectively.There was no significant difference between the values of DCA2000+ACR and 24-hour uri- nary albumin (P>0.05).Compared with the assay of 24-hour urinary albumin,the diagnosis accordance rate,sensitivity and specifici- ty of DCA2000+ACR were 82.8%,80%,85.7% respectively (P=0.001).Conclusion:All of the above assays for urinary albu- min detection were significantly correlated and can be used in clinical test.The method of Micral-Test strip which had relative higher sensitivity and relative lower specificity is convenient tot screening.There was no significant difference between DCA2000+ACR and radioimmunoassay.The assay of DCA2000+ACR corrected by creatinine can be first chosen in clinical test for the best correlation with 24-hour urinary albumin and its convenience.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?