The balance of nature: Reflections on the physics and mathematics structure of the living world and the human genome
M. Martínez‐Frías
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32337
2008-07-15
Abstract:Over the past 50 years, the body of the scientific knowledge has grown tremendously, reaching such dimensions that a single person can only have a strong background and knowledge base in a relatively restricted field in a specific discipline. This is the opposite situation to that of the past, when the scientific information available was limited such that an individual could be conversant with virtually all scientific areas, such as Physics, Mathematics, Chemistry, Physiology, etc. This implies thatwhereas in olden days personal scientific reflections were necessarily based on an integrated evaluation of the knowledge available in all such areas, nowadays this is no longer possible for a single person, or even for small groups working in the same discipline. Thus, the spectacular amount of biomedical information currently available may not be unconditionally advantageous, unless we make an effort to evaluate our research in an integral manner and in the context of information from other disciplines. Indeed, we must bear in mind that our findings belong to processes that are part of the Natural world and as such, they must follow their general laws that govern Nature. In a study published in 1941 by the zoologist and mathematician Thompson, it was argued that the organic world is structured and governed in the same mathematical way as the inorganic one. This is a point of view that was already present in the ancient Greeks, who believed in the numerical identity of the universe. As examples, Thompson explained how dividing cells follow the same physical laws that give rise to a soap bubble, and the pattern observed in chromosomes distribution during the first division of the worm egg, Cerebratulus, was equivalent to the behavior in a magnetic field between two equal yet opposing electric poles. All the considerations and conclusions reached by Thompson [1941] were derived from his reflections on the mathematical and physical rules that govern nature, and those related to the different structures and their geometry were the clearest examples. Among these structures, we can enumerate the following shapes: helix and spiral (observed in the tendrils of some plants, DNA, horns, the external skeletons of some animals, etc.); hexagon (insect eyes, bee honeycombs, etc.), cone (thorns, teeth, corns, etc.). Additionally, there is a fascinating and impressive variety in the geometric structures found in the external skeleton of animals, as well as among microscopic organisms such as the foraminifers (Fig. 1) and radiolarians (Fig. 2), whose scientific denominations even make reference to their geometric structure (i.e., Circogonia icosahedra, Medusetta tetranema, Cortinetta tripodiscus). Another paradigm of mathematical patterns can be derived from the numeric order of petals observed in the flowers of different plants, which follow the Fibonacci series. In this series, each number is the sum of the two previous ones, starting at the number 3 (1þ 2), and followed by 5 (3þ 2), 8 (3þ 5), 13 (5þ 8), 21, 34, etc. However, many structures in the Nature, particularly geometric shapes, are so complex that it is not possible to explain them by classical mathematics. These forms were considered as either mathematically unsolved problems, ‘‘curiosities’’ or rare freaks