Statistical analysis of ELF/VLF magnetic field disturbances before major earthquakes

Zeren Zhi-Ma,Shen Xu-Hui,Cao Jin-Bin,Zhang Xue-Min,Huang Jian-Ping,Liu Jing,Ouyang Xin-Yan,Zhao Shu-Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.11.017
2012-01-01
Chinese Journal of Geophysics
Abstract:The magnetic field data recorded by the microsatellite DEMETER is utilized to carry Out statistical analysis about the characteristics of ELF/VLF emission disturbances during Ms >= 7.0 earthquakes which occurred from 2005 to 2009 in the north hemisphere. For each earthquake, in the area of +/- 10 degrees of latitude and longitude from the epicenter, the normal background map were constructed during the same period (from 2 month before the earthquake to 1 month after the earthquake) for the years from 2005 to 2009 using the power spectrum density data of the magnetic field in the ELF/VLF frequency band [370 similar to 897 Hz]. A formula is defined to characterize the perturbation amplitude of the magnetic field during earthquake periods relative to the background, and the perturbation amplitude is normalized by the standard deviation of background data. Statistical analysis of perturbation amplitude during major earthquakes shows that for the 42% of these earthquakes, the perturbation amplitude increased 30 days before the earthquake, more than 3 times the standard deviation, and began to decline 20 days before the earthquake, and the earthquake occurred during the descent stage of the perturbation amplitude. However, for the 35% of the major earthquakes, the perturbation amplitude began to increase 20 days before the earthquake, and reached more than 3 times the standard deviation 10 days before the earthquake, and the earthquake occurred at the high perturbation stage. The remaining 23% of the major earthquakes shows no obvious spatial and temporal patterns. Random tests confirm that the magnetic field intensity recorded by DEMETER satellite at random locations during quiet phases (quiet space weather and no major earthquake occurred) shows no obvious spatial and temporal evolution pattern. It is demonstrated that the average perturbation amplitude of the magnetic field relative to its background change slightly over random locations, and its maximum perturbation amplitude was never more than two times the standard deviation of its background.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?