Do we make a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction just depending on once cardiac biomarker examination?

王芾,贺永明
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To diagnose acute myocardial infarction (AMI) combinationed with CK、CK-MB and CK-MB/CK with new critical value.Methods One thousand and seventy -five consecutive patients underwent creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB test from Sep.1st,2006 to May.30st, 2008 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow Uuniversity. 463 of them died of acute myocardial infarction and 612 of non-acute myocardial infarction.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis studied the diagnostic power of the CK、CK-MB and CK-MB/CK those 3 indices.Results ROC demonstrated that the area under the curve(AUC) of the CK was 0.811,95%confidence interval(CI) 0.786~0.834,Z was 22.595,P was 0.0001,the cut-off value was 148;the AUC of CK-MB was 0.840,95%CI was 0.816~0.861,Z was 26.578,P was 0.0001,the cut-off value was 29.8.the AUC of the ratio of CK-MB/CK was 0.533,95%CI 0.503~0.563, Z was 1.857,P was 0.0633.ROC also demonstrated that the diagnostic power of Ck-MB was better than the one of the ratio of CK,with significant differences.However,the ratio of CK-MB/CK had no statistical significance.Conclusions While CK>148 and(or) CK-MB>29.8,the sensibility and the specificity with diagnosing AMI are the best.However the CK-MB /CK's value is short of statistical significance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?