Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 in Patients with Primary Laryngeal Carcinoma: a Tissue Microarray Study.

P. Dong,X. Li,Z. Yu,G. Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s002221510700031x
2007-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To determine the correlation between expression of cyclooxygenase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-2, in patients with laryngeal carcinoma.DESIGN:The study included 85 primary laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cases. Expression was assessed using Envision immunohistochemical stains for cyclooxygenase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-2.SUBJECTS:A tissue microarray containing samples from the 85 primary laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cases was assembled. Immunohistochemical testing for cyclooxygenase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-2 was performed. Using Pearson correlation, expression of these proteins was compared with the following clinicopathological variables: age, sex, clinical tumour-node-metastasis staging, and prognosis. Three-year survival curves, factored by cyclooxygenase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression, were generated for overall survival, by Kaplan-Meier analysis.RESULTS:The expression of cyclooxygenase-2 significantly differed between patients with different pathology, tumour-node-metastasis stage and prognosis. A marked difference in vascular endothelial growth factor expression was seen between two histological grade groups. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 protein statistically significantly differed between patients with different tumour-node-metastasis stages, lymph node metastases and three-year survival rates. The expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in laryngeal carcinoma tissue was found to be associated with the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2.CONCLUSION:Cyclooxygenase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 may act as clinical prognostic indicators of tumour growth and differentiation in laryngeal carcinoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?