Abstract:INTRODUCTION:This study continues our assessment of agreement and disagreement among 25 Chinese and 20 US orthodontists in the ranking for facial attractiveness of end-of-treatment photographs of randomly sampled growing Chinese and white orthodontic patients. The main aims of this article were to (1) measure the overall pattern of agreement between the mean rankings of US and Chinese orthodontists, and (2) measure the strength of agreement between the rankings of the US and Chinese orthodontists for each patient.METHODS:Each judge independently ranked standard clinical sets of profile, frontal, and frontal-smiling photographs of 43 US patients and 48 Chinese patients. For each patient, a separate mean rank was computed from the responses of each group of judges. Pearson correlations between the mean ranks of the 2 groups of judges were used to measure their overall agreement. Paired and unpaired t tests were used to measure the agreement between the judges of the 2 groups for each patient.RESULTS:The overall agreement between the mean rankings of the US and Chinese judges was very high. For the US patients, the correlation between the Chinese and US judges means was r = 0.92, P <0.0001. For the Chinese patients, the analogous value was r = 0.86, P <0.0001. Agreement between the 2 groups of judges concerning each patient was also generally strong. For two thirds of the patients, the mean ranks of the US and Chinese judges differed by less than 1 unit in a scale of 12. However, for 6 patients considered individually (5 Chinese and 1 US), the assessment of the 2 groups of judges was statistically significantly different at P values ranging from 0.02 to less than 0.0001, even after the Bonferroni correction.CONCLUSIONS:These findings demonstrate that orthodontic clinicians can reliably identify and rank subtle differences between patients, and that differences between judges and between patients can be distinguished at a high level of statistical significance, given appropriate study designs. However, the reasons clinicians give for the differences in their judgments are more difficult to investigate and will require further study.

A comparative study of profile assessments between professionals and patients with cleft lip and palate

Comparative Assessment of the Cleft Profile by Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate, Cleft Surgeons, and Lay People.

Evaluation of nasolabial lateral profile harmony in cleft lip and palate patients

Preliminary Investigations on Distinct Proteomics Profiles for Different Subtypes of Non-Syndromic Cleft Palate Based on SELDI-TOF-MS

Interpersonal Impressions of Cleft and Non-Cleft Adolescents: A Panel Assessment Study of Peers, Laypersons, and Clinicians Using 3dMD Image

Comparison of Three Methods of Assessment of Cleft Lip and Nose Deformity

Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.

Rating nasolabial appearance on three-dimensional images in cleft lip and palate: a comparison with standard photographs

A Comparison of Esthetic Preferences on Female Skeletal Class II Alterations among Laypeople of Different Facial Profiles

Facial Analysis of Patients with Unilateral or Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using 3D Stereophotogrammetry

Comparison of Chinese and US Orthodontists' Averaged Evaluations of "facial Attractiveness" from End-of-treatment Facial Photographs.

Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. A subjective and objective evaluation

Objective Measurements for Grading the Nasal Esthetics on Basal View in Individuals with Secondary Cleft Nasal Deformity

Cone-beam Computed Tomography–synthesized Cephalometric Study of Operated Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Noncleft Children with Class III Skeletal Relationship

Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, general dentists, and laypersons for Indian facial profiles: A cross-sectional study

Comparative study of three methods on assessing velopharyngeal function

Correlating Jaw Bone Growth and Nasal Morphology Among Adult Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Retrospective Cephalometric Study

Quantitative Assessment of Lip Morphology in Patients With and Without Cleft Lip and Palate Using 3-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry

Objective and subjective evaluation of the efficacy of trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis: A correlation analysis between computed tomography measurements and FACE-Q scores

Evaluation of the facial profile of skeletal Class III patients undergoing camouflage orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Lower Facial Asymmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Non-Cleft Patients with Class Iii Skeletal Relationship