Evaluation of Clinical,Endoscopic,Endoscopic Ultrasonograph Pathological in 37 Patients with Duodenal Protrude Lesions Larger Than＞1.0cm

Zhe ZHANG,Lei SHEN,Shi-yun TAN,He-sheng LUO,Zhi-yang SHEN,Jie-ping YU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3870/lcxh.j.issn.1005-541x.2010.05.09

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the features of clinical, endoscopic, endoscopic ultrasonograph and pathological of duodenal protrude lesions.Methods 37 patients with duodenal protrude lesion all were examind and treated with electronic endoscope , some were examed with endoscopic ultrasonograph (EUS) .Results In endoscope , 23 protrude lesions were located in duodenal ampulla, 14 in descending part . Among these 14 cases were diagnosed duodenal adenomatous polyps, 4 were hyperplastic polyp, 2 were adenocarcinoma.For 17 cases , 11 cases were diagnosed stromal tumor in EUS, 4 were submucous cyst, 2 were lipoma. 24 cases pathological result displayed that 14 cases were adenomatous polyps after operation, 4 were hyperplastic polyps, 2 were lipoma, 3 were benign stromal tumor, 1 was leiomyoma. 7 cases were suspected malignant stromal tumor (4 cases were malignant stromal tumors, 2were benign stromal tumor, 1 case unknown).Treatment There were 24 lesions were treated by high frequency electric resection. Among the 7 cases which were suspected malignant stromal tumors, 6 were treated by surgery, 1 was conservatively observed. 4 cases of cysts using the hematoma loop ligation treatment in endoscopy, 2 cases of duodenal adenocarcinoma accepted conservative support symptomatic treatment. All cases were still under dynamic observation.Conclusion The examination of electronic endoscope, endoscopic ultrasonograph and pathology are of great value for duodenal elevated lesions with diameter1.0 cm.